Skip to main content
TrustRadius
IBM Aspera on Cloud

IBM Aspera on Cloud

Overview

What is IBM Aspera on Cloud?

IBM Aspera on Cloud is a hosted service of IBM Aspera. Rather than just optimizing or accelerating data transfer, IBM Aspera’s high-speed data transfer fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and scale up with no theoretical limit, without…

Read more

Learn from top reviewers

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Pay as You Go

$1.01

Cloud
per month per GB transferred

Standard Edition

$760.80

Cloud
per year

Advanced Edition

$11,088.00

Cloud
per year

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://ibm.biz/Aspera_Pricing_page

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Demos

IBM Aspera on Cloud

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is IBM Aspera on Cloud?

IBM Aspera on Cloud is a hosted service of IBM Aspera. Rather than just optimizing or accelerating data transfer, IBM Aspera’s high-speed data transfer fully utilizes available network bandwidth to maximize speed and scale up with no theoretical limit, without impacting other network traffic. According to the vendor, the solution drives unmatched transfer speeds, end-to-end security, reliability, and exceptional bandwidth control. IBM Aspera on Cloud also offers file sharing, workflow automation, central administration, and real-time visibility.

https://ibm.biz/Aspera_Product_page

Buy now


IBM Aspera on Cloud Features

  • Supported: High-speed data transfer
  • Supported: Built-in encryption
  • Supported: Intuitive file sharing
  • Supported: Bidirectional synchronization
  • Supported: Automated workflows
  • Supported: File preview
  • Supported: Configurable file deletion policies
  • Supported: SAML Integration
  • Supported: Customizeable URLs
  • Supported: Branding and customization
  • Supported: Centralized administration
  • Supported: Hybrid cloud

IBM Aspera on Cloud Screenshots

Screenshot of automated workflowsScreenshot of simple transferScreenshot of transfer management

IBM Aspera on Cloud Video

IBM Aspera on Cloud helps organizations quickly move data of all sizes

IBM Aspera on Cloud Competitors

IBM Aspera on Cloud Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsWindows, Linux, Mac
Mobile ApplicationApple iOS, Android

Frequently Asked Questions

MASV, LucidLink, and Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT are common alternatives for IBM Aspera on Cloud.

Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 8.1.

The most common users of IBM Aspera on Cloud are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews From Top Reviewers

(1-3 of 3)

Thinking about Aspera? Prepare to leave your competition in the dust!

Rating: 10 out of 10
November 11, 2019
Vetted Review
Verified User
IBM Aspera on Cloud
2 years of experience
IBM Aspera On Cloud is a solution used by our company to fulfill complex, bespoke file sets in excess of 300 GB. The business requirement is that we fulfill these packages in a single business day, globally. It's quite a challenge to do so in an industry where security is tight and connections are varied. The FASP Protocol in Aspera helps us meet our goals, both allowing us to turn around our workspace contents quickly, and offering the absolute fastest, safest connection possible. It meets both our stringent security standards and our speed requirements.
  • Totally secure workspaces. Files are invisible unless shared and authenticated.
  • Unparalleled speeds of transfer - Haven't capped the speeds yet, across multiple users.
  • Top-notch support services. I've never had a ticket go longer than 24 hours without being reviewed by an engineer, resolved, and closed.
Cons
  • Functionality is growing, and new features are being added (sometimes changing the experience without warning).
  • The UI is rather sparse and requires some getting used to.
  • Features like search and filtering on workspace names are still missing, so some scrolling is required to work within the Files menu.
There is no better transfer service being offered for the price, and no other transfer service that isn't renting pipe from IBM can touch the speed. Aspera can be used by any part of an organization, workspaces can be spun up in less than a minute, files can be transferred as fast as the pipe allows, and shared in seconds.
  • Aspera has changed the way we do business. We are now able to share huge file sets electronically, saving on external drives, shipping costs, time, and effort.
  • Our industry is very slow to commit to electronic alternatives to physical media. In less than three years, the positive results of using this service have caused over 70% of our user base to fully commit to electronic delivery, with the number of physical fulfillments quickly being driven toward zero.
  • Transfers within our own company, which formerly relied solely on FTP/HTTP transfer drives that would take days now take minutes with Aspera. Our software team relies on the speed and accuracy of the transfers.
Other services were very barebones and did not offer storage options. The option of not using on-premise storage for a transfer solution is a game-changer. We can rely on the distributed node advantage for data protection and speed, while still maintaining the integrity of our software packages and not worrying about size requirements.
And the speed. Not even a contest. Aspera gives us more speed than we can use, and our clients get the benefit of being able to transfer content whenever and wherever.
IBM Support is fast, knowledgeable, and works as a team. When I open a ticket, regardless of severity, I get an answer in an hour or less. A team of engineers looks at the problem and provides documented solutions, and even gives a post-mortem of an event so that we can easily understand what went wrong. I have never had a ticket open for more than 24 hours.

Long time File Transfer SME, experience with Aspera on Cloud

Rating: 7 out of 10
March 07, 2025
DL
Vetted Review
Verified User
IBM Aspera on Cloud
4 years of experience
We use IBM Aspera On Cloud for one of our divisions. All others are still using legacy Aspera applications (Faspex, Shares, Console, Orchestrator) and Signiant's. The division using AoC is primarely because of the "Workspace" feature. This is letting us segment different workflows while not granting access to administrators and managers to more than what they need to access.
  • Segmenting workflows with the workspace feature
  • User friendly modern interface
  • Better than the competition for many features
Cons
  • The Files App needs to have the Search through sub folders features
  • Transfer Nodes management could be simplified
  • Console (Activity) application needs to have a lot more features (like Aspera Console)
  • Automation application needs to have Aspera Orchestrator intergrated totally
  • Improving administrators features. (SMTP relay tracking, notifications on failures, etc)
Even with the missing features, I can give a score of 7 based on my experience working with most of IBM Aspera's competitors. A lot of what I love about Faspex and Shares are in AoC, most of it actually. The pricing model of IBM Aspera on it's own is a time and costs savior, as the many "cost traps" of other application suites are a burden we rather avoid.
  • The workspace feature. Permitting us to satisfy access control and security of certain customers. No more "yellow flags" on audits. Division A doesn't have to see all the accounts, shared inbox and workgroups of Team B. Easier and faster to find their items.
  • No worry about overage of costs like with the main competition. One factor, amount of Petabytes transferred per year. Easy to track. No "connectors", "agents", user licenses, etc.
My experience with Aspera applications and with other vendors.
My score will go to 8 as soon as AoC's Files App has the Search Through Sub-folders feature. We want to remove Aspera Shares, which has an older inefficient user interface.
IBM Aspera always surpassed the competition in terms of features and admin/user friendliness. The cost per Gibabyte is the best, with a very simple cost structure. One element : Total amount of data transferred. Coming from a company that has been one of the first 5 customers of Aspera in 2005, I have seen all of Aspera's evolution. AoC has the best features and was the obvious choice because of our staff's experience with Aspera applications. AoC is identical to Faspex, except for the more modern GUI.

Sports media delivered worldwide to allow fans to enjoy their team!

Rating: 9 out of 10
July 07, 2020
Vetted Review
Verified User
Aspera On Cloud is used to deliver sizeable media files (often upwards of 20GB) in as fast a manner as possible across large WAN connections. Using this technology helps us to get our product to our clients that are located on distant continents so that they can meet their broadcast deadlines. This would be impossible with simple FTP methods--the transfer would be too slow.
  • Ease of use: the Graphical User Interface doesn't require technical know-how to operate
  • Delivery Receipts: this allows us the confidence to know our files have reached our customers
  • Activity Monitor: lets you know how much data you have used, which is important for budgeting reasons.
Cons
  • I would like more easily scriptable workflow support - perhaps some Python libraries?
  • Email notifications when data quotas have been reached
  • I would like to see the price difference between Standard and Advanced come down.
IBM Aspera on Cloud is well suited to deliver files across global distances--especially where workflows involve data being used by different workforces due to economic circumstances. For example, if you work in Post Production, you might use it for transferring digital film plates to be worked on by your cheaper workforce overseas.
  • Positive impact: we are able to satisfy the requirements of clients who reside in India and China
  • Positive impact: we are able to deliver files to tight deadlines
  • Positive impact: we will be able to automate workflows in the future
We have absolutely benefitted from the speed of IBM Aspera on Cloud: of our approximate 170Mbps upload bandwidth, we can get on average around 150Mbps into the Cloud storage provided. So, realistically, a 40GB upload of our media files takes about 30 minutes. From there we then send it for delivery to our clients in India and China. There are two fantastic benefits. Firstly, Aspera on Cloud is able to push the files onwards through its network at speeds of nearly 400Gbps. Secondly, in terms of total data transferred, you only have to upload it once, and then you can push it to as many client downloads as you want.
Twice weekly we perform big file transfers of media between 40GB to 70GB in size. We are able to get this to our clients within hours, something absolutely not possible via FTP/SFTP or other means. Additionally, we are able to pause the transfers using Aspera on Cloud and have absolute confidence when we resume the transfers the connection will still be valid and our clients will receive all the data that are meant to.
Security is obviously a primary concern for any business. The built-in methods of passwords and encryption enable us to have confidence that nobody but our clients will have access to our deliverables.
Return to navigation