TrustRadius Insights
- Easy Study Build Process: Several users have found the study build process relatively easy to learn and navigate, allowing them to …
Merative Clinical DevelopmentFormerly IBM Clinical Development / Watson Health
Overview
What is Merative Clinical Development?
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Recent Reviews
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
N/A
Unavailable
What is Merative Clinical Development?
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Entry-level set up fee?
- Setup fee optional
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.ibm.com/products/clinical…
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
23 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Petofy OPHR?
A Cloud Based Veterinary Software secured with Microsoft Azure that is organized for managing the whole clinic for vets. Its features include adding pets, generating their clinical visits/x-ray reports/surgeries and hospitalizations, generating immunization reports (both automatic and manual…
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
- FAQs
What is Merative Clinical Development?
Merative® Clinical Development (formerly IBM® Clinical Development) is a unified, cloud-based Clinical Data Management System designed to help reduce the cycle time to start, amend, and manage clinical studies — enabling life sciences organizations to deliver therapies and innovations faster to their patients.
Boasting a proven track record of over 3000+ clinical trials, in 90+ countries, with 1 million+ participants, the vendor states Merative® Clinical Development will help pharmaceutical, medical device, and CROs to shorten study cycle time and reduce costs.
In addition to its core electronic data capture (EDC) functionality, Merative® Clinical Development offers a fully-integrated portfolio of modules that are designed to suit every trial, including:
Medical Coding with AI- Designed to increase efficiency by leveraging AI to build consistency and reduce errors
eConsent - Deliver quick and easy remote participant consenting without additional EDC integration
Open Platform Data Integration - Allows users to build and automate data connectors with minimal coding
Reporting and Analytics - Provide Data Managers to use pre-built or custom reports to derive single and cross-study insights
Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) - Strengthens Participant Centricity with live, automatic data sync with EDC
Visit https://www.merative.com/clinical-development to learn more.
Boasting a proven track record of over 3000+ clinical trials, in 90+ countries, with 1 million+ participants, the vendor states Merative® Clinical Development will help pharmaceutical, medical device, and CROs to shorten study cycle time and reduce costs.
In addition to its core electronic data capture (EDC) functionality, Merative® Clinical Development offers a fully-integrated portfolio of modules that are designed to suit every trial, including:
Medical Coding with AI- Designed to increase efficiency by leveraging AI to build consistency and reduce errors
eConsent - Deliver quick and easy remote participant consenting without additional EDC integration
Open Platform Data Integration - Allows users to build and automate data connectors with minimal coding
Reporting and Analytics - Provide Data Managers to use pre-built or custom reports to derive single and cross-study insights
Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) - Strengthens Participant Centricity with live, automatic data sync with EDC
Visit https://www.merative.com/clinical-development to learn more.
Merative Clinical Development Screenshots
Merative Clinical Development Integrations
- BSI CTMS
- Veeva Clinical Platform
- Argus
- Transperfect
- ALMAC
- Fisher
- Medable
- TRI
- CluePoints
- Catalent
- Optum
Merative Clinical Development Competitors
Merative Clinical Development Technical Details
| Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Unspecified |
| Mobile Application | Apple iOS, Android, Windows Phone, Blackberry, Mobile Web |
| Supported Countries | Worldwide usage |
| Supported Languages | 50 + languages and dialects |
Merative Clinical Development Downloadables
Frequently Asked Questions
IBM Clinical Development (formerly eClinicalOS) is a cloud-based electronic data capture (EDC) system.
Medidata Rave EDC, Veeva Vault PromoMats, and Medrio are common alternatives for Merative Clinical Development.
Reviewers rate Support Rating highest, with a score of 8.6.
The most common users of Merative Clinical Development are from Mid-sized Companies (51-1,000 employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(33)
Community Insights
TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!
- Pros
- Cons
- Easy Study Build Process: Several users have found the study build process relatively easy to learn and navigate, allowing them to quickly create studies. The availability of tools within the system has been praised for assisting builders throughout the process.
- Excellent Support: Many reviewers highly appreciate the outstanding support provided by the technical helpdesk and project management teams, which has been instrumental in their success with the system.
- Dedicated Client Success Manager: Users value having their own Client Success Manager who provides excellent guidance and assistance throughout their experience with the system. The specific mention of a user's Client Success Manager doing an excellent job highlights this positive aspect.
Slow response to suggestions/issues: Some users have expressed frustration with the slow response from the system's support team when it comes to addressing suggestions or issues related to enhancing the system functionalities.
Non-standard functionalities require additional payments: Several reviewers have mentioned that certain functionalities in the system are not included in the standard package and require additional payments, which can be a disadvantage for some users.
Expensive certification in certain modules: The cost of certification in certain modules, such as Data Migrator, has been highlighted by a number of users as being expensive, making it less accessible for individuals or companies on a tight budget.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-1 of 1)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
June 29, 2022
Strong and flexible system
IBM Clinical Development is used by our data management department with other EDC system[s]. We use it to design our clinical studies to collect data. IBM Clinical Development is a strong and easy to use EDC system - the late[st] update provided to the system [is] very helpful and give[s] more solutions option to the users.
- Easy to use.
- Flexible.
- All in one place.
- efficient certification training
- CTMS
- eConsent
- Stronger reporting
- No surprise, we know what will be our study design.
- Shorter timeline than Rave - one of the main competitor EDCs.
- Relatively quick mid-study updates.
More flexibility with IBM Clinical Development, less heavy to design and offer[s] strong feature[s]. Rave is a stronger EDC system with a very interesting reporting option and a very good reputation with the users, however very heavy to manipulate from the design side.
50
Clinical Data Manager
Designers
CRA
Designers
CRA
20
Data Managers and designers. Before start working on the design we require the employee to be IBM designer certified
- Study Design
- Study conduct
- Monitoring
- Split release ( eCRF release separate from Edit release)
- eConsent
- Smart reporting
- Remote monitoring
Yes
I don;t remember , I wasn't part of the organization yet
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Prior Experience with the Product
ICD offer the right balance, I can select one item it;s a combination of the above which actually is the best quality the system have. The right balance between price, features and usability
I will challenge IBM more on a validation step. This seems to be requested more and more by our client. How do we as an organization validate the EDC system, I would challenge ICD to support that
- Implemented in-house
- N/A
- no training
we use the self training provided by IBM and yes I would recommend it
yes , use specific template , document the use , test since some configuration may have an impact on other elements in the study
No - we have not done any customization to the interface
No - we have not done any custom code
N/A
No , costing.
Yes
ICD behave in test different from live. This answer was given by tech support.
also , ICD dynamics with extra space in the text did not work in windows explorer when worked perfectly in chrome
also , ICD dynamics with extra space in the text did not work in windows explorer when worked perfectly in chrome
with first Covid studies, the support was highly appreciated and the collaboration was at its best
- Page Status
- User and site creation
- document and datasets extract
- Complex edit programming
Yes, but I don't use it
- Randomization
- CTMS
worked successfully with multiple studies
- N/A
not for now but possibly if the future
- File import/export
- API (e.g. SOAP or REST)
I wasn't aware of the other technologies and curious to hear about them
clarify responsible, there is always a lot of confusion on who's responsible for what part
Wasn't part of the negotiation
clearly define responsibilities and task ownership
- more flexibility for ePRO , date format conversion is part of it
- eConsent
No
No