IBM Cloud Databases
Top Rated
TRUE
IBM Cloud Databases
Overview
What is IBM Cloud Databases?
IBM Cloud Databases are open source data stores for enterprise application development. Built on a Kubernetes foundation, they offer a database platform for serverless applications. They are designed to scale storage and compute resources seamlessly without being constrained by the...
Read moreRecent Reviews
How IBM Cloud Databases Differs From Its Competitors
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Popular Features
View all 6 features- Database security provisions (80)8.383%
- Automated backups (87)8.383%
- Database scalability (84)8.080%
- Monitoring and metrics (84)7.474%
Video Reviews
Leaving a video review helps other professionals like you evaluate products. Be the first one in your network to record a review of IBM Cloud Databases, and make your voice heard!
Pricing
View all pricingEntry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting / Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
12 people want pricing too
Alternatives Pricing
Product Demos
IBM Cloud Foundation Skills Series - Introduction To Databases
08:55
Features
Return to navigation
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is IBM Cloud Databases?
IBM Cloud Databases are open source data stores for enterprise application development. Built on a Kubernetes foundation, they offer a database platform for serverless applications. They are designed to scale storage and compute resources seamlessly without being constrained by the limits of a single server. Natively integrated and available in the IBM Cloud console, these databases are now available through a consistent consumption, pricing, and interaction model. They aim to provide a cohesive experience for developers that include access control, backup orchestration, encryption key management, auditing, monitoring, and logging.
List of available databases
IBM Cloud Databases for etcd
IBM Cloud Messages for Rabbit MQ
List of available databases
IBM Cloud Databases for PostgreSQL
IBM Cloud Databases for MongoDB
IBM Cloud Databases for Redis
IBM Cloud Databases for EnterpriseDB(EDB)
IBM Cloud Databases for ElasticsearchIBM Cloud Databases for etcd
IBM Cloud Messages for Rabbit MQ
IBM Cloud Databases Features
Database-as-a-Service Features
- Supported: Automatic software patching
- Supported: Database scalability
- Supported: Automated backups
- Supported: Database security provisions
- Supported: Monitoring and metrics
- Supported: Automatic host deployment
IBM Cloud Databases Video
Introduction to IBM Cloud Databases
IBM Cloud Databases Competitors
IBM Cloud Databases Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Google Cloud SQL, Azure Database, and Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) are common alternatives for IBM Cloud Databases.
Reviewers rate Automated backups and Database security provisions highest, with a score of 8.3.
The most common users of IBM Cloud Databases are from Small Businesses (1-50 employees).
Comparisons
View all alternativesCompare with
Reviews and Ratings
(216)
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-2 of 2)- Popular Filters
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 21, 2021
Solid choice for AaaS NoSQL hosting
IBM Compose is providing us with an Architecture-As-A-Service solution for persistent, highly-available NoSQL based data storage. We primarily use it to host data for our microservices and Glitch integrations. The ease of use in getting started and the ongoing low overhead of maintaining the product have been perfect. We haven't had a moment of trouble since starting to use the service.
- Persistent data storage for microservices
- Fast and easy, but secure, NoSQL storage for integrations and bots
- Quick setup time, great for rapid prototypes which may graduate to real products and should thus start on a firm foundation.
83.33333333333334%
8.3
- Saves us time.
- It's a low-cost provider at the entry level, but remains fully-featured and secure.
- Lets devs provision DBs on their own for microservices, allowing them to move faster, safely.
We were comparing them against other Architecture As A Service providers. SSL connections to the database were essential, which eliminated most of the playing field, and given that we sought out the lowest-cost provider with an acceptable web management UI. Compose won on these fronts.
While we haven't made use of this yet, it's an important component for our security profile. Knowing that VPC support is available for the database connection means that we have an extra layer of protection as our data travels through the internet, giving us increased security redundancy. This has been a blocker for us in the past when considering other cloud database solutions.
Using a DBaaS is the best practice today. There's little to no reason to be hosting your own databases and managing all of the infrastructure that go along with it. Cloud DBaaS providers are the way forward, not only in saving time and costs, but also in providing better performance and redundancy than can commonly be achieved with self-hosted databases.
Implementation was easy and smooth, I had no issues connecting with the cloud databases, managing their schemas, etc. Getting the connection working took pretty much as much time as I expected-- there was a low barrier to entry and it was easy to get the connection details.
No
Basic (free)
We didn't seek advanced usages of databases beyond a persistent and reliable key/value store, and we had in-house experience sufficient to work with that sort of database without additional help. The support documents and whatnot offered were sufficient to our needs.
If we were to expand our use of the cloud databases beyond the abilities of our in-house technical knowledge, we'd consider upgrading our support tier.
I haven't interacted with IBM support personnel. Honestly this speaks to the strength of the documentation and the intuitiveness of the web application itself.
- IBM Cloud Docs
- Ability to check uptime status for IBM Cloud products
As a young startup we wanted to focus on our core product and not be held back by infrastructure management and maintenance. This is why we moved our RabbitMQ and (persistent) Redis clusters to compose.io. We no longer have to provide servers, maintenance, monitoring, etc. for those parts of our infrastructure.
- Robust Redis and RabbitMQ clusters with no downtime within the last 18 months.
- With RabbitMQ, putting special policies on specific queues was not possible via the admin interface and required contacting their support (The support guys promptly configured those policies, though).
60%
6.0
- We no longer have to maintain, upgrade, or deal with downtime of our own Redis and RabbitMQ clusters. In hindsight it feels strange to have ever had self-hosted clusters for those services (where in our case additional latency of a few milliseconds is acceptable).
We have not yet tried VPC via VPE.
Using DBaaS from IBM Cloud (aka Compose) has helped us to focus on development rather than operating databases, database clusters, rolling upgrades, backups, ... At the same time this has drastically improved uptime of our systems as some of those databases are important backbones of our infrastructure.
We did not require any premium support yet.
No