IBM Connections is a collaboration tool with key features like social analytics, blogs, document management, and a social network.IBM Connections on-premises: Excellent, but SMBs may want to look at the cloud version instead.We piloted IBM Connections 5.0 (on-premises) for about 8 months but ended up deciding to evaluate cloud options instead. Our user base is about 650 users and we were looking to move up from Lotus Quickr. We knew we needed something that would work natively on iOS as well as on Windows PCs and in browsers, provide us with additional document control (ECM-type features), and of course integration of social tools to provide easier access to people and information. Usage statistics and reporting were also a concern; users wanted to know when their content was useful (or not).,The web UI is very easy for most users to get around. The mobile app UI is even better, especially for Blogs and Files. It’s clear IBM has done a lot of work around the usability of Connections. Most users immediately felt at home regardless of which social network(s) they’ve used. Technically savvy users quickly discovered how to customize a Community for their own purposes. After the initial introduction, most users could use the Connections web UI and mobile app easily without IT intervention. Ideation Blogs are a great way to brainstorm and share ideas, then vote on those ideas. The concept is great, and hopefully as time goes on IBM refines it with additional administrative control. Early test groups loved the mobile app immediately with its super easy file sync capabilities and associated document editing app (even though we did not have IBM Docs). Profiles were a big hit right away, making it easy to find, tag (recommend), and follow other people that might not otherwise be connected with in the organization. The ability to Tag, #hashtag and Follow virtually anything in Connections provides users easy ways to connect with people and content. External collaboration, even though we never specifically tested this, appears to be very clear in Connections, providing customers etc. a secure way to share information with internal teams. Search functionality is very good.,The lack of a note-taking tool became a bigger and bigger issue as time went on. Our pilot users felt Connections was a natural place to take and share meeting notes – including photos, drawings, recorded audio, etc. – and were always frustrated that there was no easy, organized way to do that. We tried using a Blog, Wiki, etc. but nothing really resonated as a good solution for this. The Wiki tool is weak, providing rigid structure but with few options. A Community can only have a single Wiki, for instance. Wikis are weak in the mobile app as well; they’re not even easy to navigate. Users ended up ignoring Wikis completely despite our efforts to get them to convert documents like guidelines, policies, procedures, handbooks, etc. into Wiki form. The Windows Explorer plug-in was useful but required a lot of manual intervention to setup. For instance, once a user joins a Community in Connections, the Community also has to be manually added to the Explorer plug-in so the user can find, open and edit files with it. We felt this process should be much more automated. Tagging is only relevant in the web UI and, to a lesser extent, in the mobile app. However, in the Windows Explorer plug-in, Tags are not usable at all making it difficult to find things that were easy to find in the web UI. IBM Docs was not included in the on-premises deployment; it was an additional license so we did not test it. Documents, mainly Microsoft Office files, are still the single most common way our user community creates, shares, edits and presents information. That proved to be a major gap for our users, and slowed user adoption considerably. We considered testing it, but IBM Docs would only work for about half of our users so we found ourselves wondering if we really wanted to support two document editing platforms. IBM Docs also offers no way to work offline as far as we could tell. This also meant we would need to keep licensing Microsoft Office which is not cheap. Consulting costs are high because the back-end environment is complex. Installing, administrating and even patching Connections is a fairly complex process. We needed to hire consultants to install our test environment and any major upgrades would’ve required additional consulting fees. Any 3rd party add-ons we looked at were highly technical in nature meaning…you guessed it, more consulting costs. Administrating IBM Connections requires editing XML files in a specific, secure way that is typically done in a console. I love consoles as much as the next admin, but when you only use a console once every 2 months it means looking up all the documentation and re-educating yourself. A single change could take me 2 hours to implement. 3rd party admin dashboards do exist, at an additional cost, but IBM really should provide a much easier way to manage the environment. The lack of in-person or online training courses, materials, videos, etc. really discouraged a lot of users. The only decent training we could find (marketing videos aside) was a single video series on which, of course, was an additional cost. In the end that video didn’t really help our users much beyond introductory concepts. IBM includes reporting, but it’s a massive Cognos system requiring some serious hardware and Cognos expertise. We had neither, and would have ultimately opted for a 3rd party add-on for reporting and statistics. An often overlooked concern is eDiscovery. Our contracted eDiscovery service extensively works with various ECMs, but had no idea how they would handle Connections data. The cloud version of Connections offers an add-on for eDiscovery, but as far as we could tell IBM offered nothing for on-premises deployments.,6,IBM Connections 5.0 on-premises provided our pilot groups with better overall communications. Communities sprang up around projects, teams, departments, and even topics like new technologies. As the groups expanded their usage, they found posting Status updates, new or updated Files, and so forth really helped everyone keep up. Throughout our pilot we kept noticing that despite the availability of tools like Blogs, Wikis, etc., our users tended to primarily use Microsoft Office documents instead. Even "millennials" coming in expected full, native support to view and edit Microsoft Office files from the web UI. IBM Docs appears to be a suitable replacement but adds cost to the solution overall. Most of the admins, developers and technical support staff at our organization are heavily Microsoft-centric and find IBM software difficult to integrate, support and find training for. The Connections on-premises server environment is a complex one, requiring either extensive in-house skill with IBM technologies or costly consulting. SMBs should look to the cloud version instead.,,IBM Notes, IBM Sametime,Yes,Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience with the Product Analyst Reports Third-party Reviews,Given the timing of the market, it's hard to imagine doing it any differently. We did not have the resources to test more than one solution and IBM's seemed like a great fit. It definitely had the best pricing, making it an easy pitch for approval to move forward.,9,No,Not for Connections specifically (we only piloted it). I do have some stories for exceptional support over the years for Notes, Sametime, Quickr and Protector though!,Status Updates are brilliant. Always 1 or 2 clicks away. Profiles are really great, especially when you need to find or contact someone from the mobile app. File sync is super easy, and on the mobile app that's a really big thing to get right. Customizing Communities is pretty straightforward and IBM provides a fair amount of customization to help each Community. Consuming blog posts on the mobile app is a really immersive experience. Customizing notifications for end-users is really nice -- but it had to be enabled on the back-end (by modifying some XML file). Ideation Blogs are extremely helpful and easy to use. User adoption went very well thanks to IBM's clever implementations of common social concepts such as Liking, Following, Tags, #hashtags, and so forth.,Wikis are weak. We wanted to see more control, more security, more presentation options, more structuring options, etc. Many wiki solutions offer a lot more flexibility. Even in the mobile app, wikis were not easy to navigate and cannot be edited. Working with Microsoft Office files from the web UI was a download-edit-upload process. Users were not willing to do that. The Windows Explorer plug-in is not as intuitive as it should be. Communities are not automatically added and Tags are not readily exposed. Activities are valuable but quickly get messy. A Kanban-style 3rd party implementation is much cleaner but of course costs extra. Software patches on the back-end are cumbersome, time consuming and the process is not entirely clear.,Yes,9,7,10,9IBM Connections reviewIBM Connections is being used throughout the whole organization (34,000+ end users) as a social addition to the statically delivered intranet. The main business problem and why this organizations has decided to choose for IBM Connections is in fact that it pushed out to the end users to work more closely together on projects and in day to day work situations. IBM Connections fulfills in that completely. With the mobility part of IBM Connections the circle was completely round as this was one of the biggest issue's we had with the current intranet which was too much statically build and not developed for mobile clients (not build with a responsive web design). We have just introduced the CCM part of IBM Connections which will replace overtime to all current file-shares which are being delivered via OLD fashioned way of serving files via a FileServer model. All this together is for us a major improvement on the next step of our journey in the intranet world.,The Mobile consummation of IBM Connections is very good and is rapidly improving over time. Every month a new version of the Mobile app for IBM Connections is being delivered which fixes bugs but also adds new functionality over time. Stability is very high of the product as it runs on IBM WebSphere (which has proved itself already in the MidMarket segment completely) and is very important for us as a customer because this keeps the day to day management costs for the environment very low. The open design of the product. It's fairly easy to extend the product but also the end user working and feeling is open. What I mean by that is that the product supports self serviceability so no costs at the IT department regarding of creating FileShares and so on. Out of the box IBM Connections delivers a complete solution which can be used as a base to extend on. Connections to already existing LDAP/SAP/Domiono or other HR systems can easily be build via the delivered license of IBM Security Directory Integrator product with IBM Connections which is almost limitless in connecting different resources together.,The UI of the activities component really needs a redesign. Currently this component was there already from the beginning of IBM Connections and never got a UI overhaul. Currently the functionality is working exceptionally good but the UI is too much based on Text instead of a graphical UI. Better integration with PIM (Personal Information Manager like (domino and/or exchange)) environments. Currently for the admin side of IBM Connections a lot is done on the command line. It would be a improvement if we get a special designed ADMIN UI. Where 95% of the management of the product can be handled.,9,On the customer service part - one of the positive sides of IBM Connections is the openness. Thanks to that openness people started to help each other when they posted problems regarding company issues instead and they followed the officially designed business processes. In the end this made our company much more cost effective. Because of the mobility functionality of IBM Connections we really saw a big jump in the employee efficiency corner. They could access their documents faster and wherever they where around the globe.,,35000,4,Better collaboration of business users of different departments 24/7 availability of content and knowledge Mobility support from IBM,Self serviceability of end users (business users). Much more helpful to each other if they see from each other they struggle with the same day to day problems. Content/ Documents are reused more instead of reinvented now that people can find their content.,Extend the reach of the platform to other platforms to get that UI/content inside connections as well. Get a more steering management layer within the organization than a leading management (which is currently the situation within the organization) Connect the current business process more and more to this collaboration platform.,No,Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Vendor Reputation Existing Relationship with the Vendor Analyst Reports,To be honest regarding the selection process, I think we would do it exactly the same again. This has proved us to be quite successful still. The only thing we would change a bit is finding the right people inside the business acting as the ambassadors for the environment. I would align that much more in a day to day business situation instead of classes and we did it right now.,Implemented in-house Professional services company,Yes,Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled,Deciding how the environment had to be called within the organization. Lack of knowledge within the company about the product (in the end this was covered by hiring external people) to keep the project going. Network infrastructre wasn't prepared on how we wanted to adapt the network infrastructure to our needs.,8,In-person training,Yes,7,Yes,During a migration weekend we had some issues with database migration scripts. We called IBM Support and within 30 minutes they found us a real DB2 expert which led us in the right direction regarding how things could be solved (in the end it seemed a 2 play problem where some kind of configuration setting (which we had of course) triggered a bug within DB2) so after we found out about this we disabled the config setting ran the migration scripts and enabled the config setting again. In the end everybody was happy :-),The homepage functionality is very elegant to use. Creating of communities and their functions is very easy to do. Connections the Mobile client is straight forward.,The rich text editor of IBM Connections could get some improvements of copy/paste actions. Getting an insight within the platform on the items you do follow and the items yo do not follow is quite cumbersome.,Yes,8,9Diversity of ConnectionsIt is currently being used by a number of departments throughout the company. It is addressing different problems within each department but primarily it is being used to disseminate information, used for notifications of important deadlines and for collaboration between a large geographical area.,Notifications - easily notifying users of changes in content whether it be blogs, forums or files. Discussions - easily and quickly set up discussion topics so communities can exchange ideas on a variety of topics. Quick set up - being able to rapidly set up a community in order to get a group collaborating.,Increased security schemes. Community centric configurations Displays of textual type content (web pages),9,Better exchange of ideas More cohesiveness among members of departments who are geographically separated. Greater ability for multiple departments to share information.,Novell Vibe,MS SharePoint,9,Yes,7,Yes,Event creation and integration with Outlook Forums Blogs,Activities,Yes,8
IBM Connections
43 Ratings
Score 7.2 out of 101
<a href='' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>TRScore

IBM Connections Reviews

IBM Connections
43 Ratings
<a href='' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.2 out of 101
Show Filters 
Hide Filters 
Showing 3 of 43 IBM Connections ratings and reviews.
Clear all filters
Overall Rating
Reviewer's Company Size
Last Updated
By Topic
Job Type

Reviews (1-3 of 3)

  Vendors can't alter or remove reviews. Here's why.
No photo available
December 10, 2015

Review: "IBM Connections on-premises: Excellent, but SMBs may want to look at the cloud version instead."

Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Review Source


Connections combines all the most useful abilities from various social networks. This makes it useful of course, but it also reduces user adoption time initially by allowing users to get comfortable with basic features. Once they are comfortable, it's easy for users to start exploring. They find new people in the organization to contact, new sources of information, etc. Before you know it, about half of the users are contributing back in some form -- and all with little or no training needed by IT.
Read this authenticated review
No photo available
February 25, 2015

"IBM Connections review"

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Review Source


Overall seen the useabilty of IBM Connections is fairly easy. The ramp UP time speed is quite low for end users to understand how they can use it in their day to day business environment.
Read this authenticated review

Feature Scorecard Summary

Task Management (10)
Scheduling (5)
Workflow Automation (5)
Mobile Access (9)
Search (10)
Visual planning tools (5)
Chat (6)
Notifications (10)
Discussions (10)
Surveys (8)
Internal knowledgebase (9)
Integrates with GoToMeeting (2)
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts (1)
Integrates with Outlook (1)
Versioning (9)
Video files (5)
Audio files (5)
Document collaboration (10)
Access control (9)
Advanced security features (5)
Integrates with Google Drive (1)
Device sync (8)

About IBM Connections

IBM Connections is a collaboration tool with key features like social analytics, blogs, document management, and a social network.
Categories:  Collaboration