Skip to main content
TrustRadius
IBM Power servers

IBM Power servers

Overview

What is IBM Power servers?

The IBM Power product line is a family of servers.

Read more
Recent Reviews
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is IBM Power servers?

IBM Power servers are designed for the most demanding, data-intensive computing imaginable, while keeping the business protected.

IBM offers Power10 processor-based servers, available in scale-out or scale-up variants.

The vendor promises the following benefits and differentiators:

Delivered with security

Power servers have security built in at all layers, from the processor to the OS to deliver an integrated end-to-end security solution

Enterprise cloud-ready

Power servers integrate into organizations' private or hybrid cloud strategy to handle flexible consumption models and changing customer needs.

Reliability
Boasts strong rankings in every major reliability category by ITIC*, IBM Power servers aim to deliver the reliable on-premises infrastructure to meet around-the-clock customer demands.

Value and performance
Power servers boast superior core performance and memory bandwidth to deliver both performance and price-performance advantages.

IBM Power servers Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise
Operating SystemsLinux, AIX, IBM i
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

The IBM Power product line is a family of servers.

Dell PowerEdge R, HPE ProLiant DL, and Supermicro Twin are common alternatives for IBM Power servers.

Reviewers rate Usability highest, with a score of 9.6.

The most common users of IBM Power servers are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(415)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-4 of 4)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
  • Host up to 32TB Virtual Machine
  • Redundancy out of the box
  • Works seamless with existing datacenter network and storage
  • Lower the costs
  • Lack of Support for all Linux and older versions too
I'd strongly recommend IBM Power servers to anyone who has the budget for it. A Power Virtual Machine, what is generally called FlexTB VM, can support as many small VM of 256GB, and scale up to 32TB on the fly. If IBM recommended architecture is combined with your organizational reference architecture, then forget about running into unplanned downtimes.
  • Met target delivery architecture
  • Binds easily with other equipment in the data center already, no need for new network and storage infra
  • Unable to run for long due to costs, ROI is slow
We did not try any other similar offering.
100
Datacenter management, Tools Development & Integration, Hosting, Operations and Application / Database Users.
15
  • Large Memory Virtual Machines
  • High Availability
  • Ease of Integration with existing DC Infra
No
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Ease of Use
"Scalability" was the single most important factor to us. We wanted to scale up the virtual machines to large/er/est memory possible and IBM Power servers made this possible.
We wouldn't change the evaluation process if we were to do it again.
  • Implemented in-house
Yes
Trial Phase
DC Infra Integration
Tool Integration
Operations
Scale Geographically
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
Integration with Datacenter was somewhat easy, Integration with tools/platforms was difficult.
I was not involved in the discussion regarding support categories.
Our Datacenter management teams take care of managing hardware support, issues and tracking.
No
  • Hardware Management Console
  • High Availability
  • Memory Upgrades on the fly
  • Integration with internal tools was difficult and took some time
IBM Power allows us to host and scale up to 32TB of Virtual Machine (VM). We were earlier limited to 12TB per single VM, and could only scale-out (or horizontally). Since some of our solutions are extensively memory intensive, we wanted to host larger VM.We are SAP only shop, given some SAP solutions are memory intensive and some industries need to exploit 'memory intensive' IBM Power was the only choice to scale architecture beyond 12TB memory with support for High Availability design as well! This has drastically improved the time we had to spend on optimizing the applications, solution and database.
Indika Fernando | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
  • Stability
  • Performance
  • Scalability
  • Reliability
  • Robustness
  • Manageability
  • LPM
  • WPAR
  • Python Compatibility
IBM Power Servers are suited to run industry-critical applications which should run 24*7*365 with more than 99.99 uptime. Also, they provide reliability, scalability, unbeatable performance and stability in comparison to other hardware platforms. We have servers running for more than 1000 days without a power cycle, which shows the stability of the system.
  • unbeatable system uptime
  • high efficiency
  • scalability
We always buy IBM Power/Aix systems for our business-critical applications, because we like to sleep sound at night. There's always Dell & HP for our VMware setup which runs a bunch of RHEL servers.
2000
We run our two major business-critical applications (ERP & Warehouse control system) round the clock and we have 24*7 operations carried out from 22 countries across the world. At a time there are approximately 2000 users logged into out Aix systems.
4
This is the most critical part. Since Power/Aix are not open to public it's really hard to get knowledge and experience on these systems. You have to work in IBM as a support engineer or join a big company who has IBM systems to learn this stuff.
  • Performance
  • Stability
  • Uptime
  • Manageability
  • Scalability
  • Build home grown applications to run on Power Servers
  • Run more home grown Applications
  • Adopt Linux on Power to run RHEL on Power systems
We are happy with IBM Power systems and always go with it. It's value for money and you cannot have down times since it's not measured by time anymore, it's by thousands of dollars we lost per minute.
No
  • Scalability
  • Integration with Other Systems
  • Ease of Use
  • Other
Performance & Uptime
Nothing will change. It's always IBM Power systems for business-critical applications.
  • Implemented in-house
  • Third-party professional services
Clear Technologies.
Yes
Delivery, Rack Mount/Cabling, Power up/connect to HMC/Firmware Update, VIOS/Network/SAN setup, LPM over the LPARs from old system/Create New LPARs.
Change management was a big part of the implementation and was well-handled
Since you are dealing with business-critical applications, key take is to well-plan the migration, attention to detail, document the process before hand, involve all the stakeholders upfront and do through testing with dev systems before going on with Prod systems.
  • Setting up the Network (Not a big issue though)
Systems are robust and you need to know exactly what your are going to do with them. There are multiple configurations possible and you need to gather your requirements first, before going on with the implementation. Tuning is a must before migrating production systems.
Yes. We need prompt support if we need it. Because if the business is down, downtime is measured by thousands of dollars not by the minutes.
Thay have the experts to support us in each area, and those are skilled engineers. They always guide us the best practices and finds the root causes for our issues.
No
IBM always provides exceptional support. If any issue with support, we can always escalate to the next level.
  • LPM
  • DLPAR Operations
  • System Migrations from one system to another
  • Firmware Updates (sometimes)
They are very easy to set up and use once you re knowledgeable enough to deal with it. They are continuously enhance the user experience on the HMC and operations on the systems. Once setup it's like a beast, going on and on. I have experience with servers that are not being rebooted for more than 1000 days.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Support of ibm I workloads in a single server. It’s processing power and virtualization features allow dynamic resource sharing between lpars and there are less hw to maintain. We currently have 4 production lpars sharing processing power.
  • Performance
  • Processing power
  • Cost
Virtualization of IBM i and AIX lpars. Running mixed workloads on the same server.
  • Workload consolidation
  • Processing power
  • Application performance
Basically, it’s a midrange server that consolidates mixed workloads from different OS platforms. It has great processing power and has great reliability.
All of our employees use power server directly or indirectly as our banking core runs on ibm i on power
3
System administration, virtualization, hardware, hmc management, networking, ibm i configuration, security, integrity, database engineering.
  • Banking core
  • Development
  • Api workloads
  • Api workloads
  • Power virtual server
  • Cloud object storage on ibm cloud
  • Data migration to cloud
Power is the most robust, reliable and powerful system nowadays. It runs ibm i, openshift, Aix and linux workloads
No
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Product Reputation
  • Prior Experience with the Product
We have inherited a banking core application running in ibm i, so previous experience tell us the reliability and power tha these servers have.
I wouldn’t change a bit. Maybe analyze running power on cloud
  • Implemented in-house
No
Change management was a small part of the implementation and was well-handled
Don’t migrate anything if you don’t have a good backup
  • Backup and restore
Think about future workloads. Assess Hw requirements, plan and use the power workload estimator
No.
My issues have been always resolved fast and succesfully
No
I lost a disk while upgrading the licensed internal code. They assisted me to slip install the lic without losing any data
  • Lpar provisioning
  • Data migration
  • Na
Yes, but I don't use it
I love power servers
Nitish Kumar | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It is handling the main core application in my organization, the entire business is dependent on IBM i , it helps to resolve the critical issue. It is housing the core enterprise application like JDE.
Currently, with IBM POWER9 Servers, we can have more retention with a more optimized SMT8 thread.
  • IBM POWER9 Servers are much faster than the POWER6.
  • Backups take less time to be completed.
  • Highly secure and automated server
  • Uptime
  • It could be faster
  • More CPU cores could be added.
  • Looking for some new features.
  • Allow access to certain configuration items (ie. DHCP/DNS configuration) without using a GUI
In terms of speed, IBM POWER9 Servers are much faster than the POWER8 and POWER6. I don't think it is lacking anywhere.
Handling a large volume of data.
IBM POWER9 Servers have processors with a dynamic frequency which makes its operation energy saving when we do not use the total processing power.
The areas where IBM POWER9 Servers have had many improvements are with the databases. They have better performance than any other server of the competition.
  • Speed
  • Secure
  • Automated
  • UPTIME
  • It is very secure.
  • Backups are running fast and completing in few hours.
  • More Linux libraries for AIX
With these latest IBM POWER9 Servers-based systems based on the latest technologies, IBM Cognitive Systems continues its tradition of delivering value to clients in the form of performance, RAS, and solution value.
IBM POWER9 Servers scaled up nicely from our POWER7 and POWER8 servers to provide better performance per core and more memory capacity for the cost.
It's easy to use and very secure with virtualization technology with PowerVM
7
It is handling the main core application in my organization, entire business dependent on ibmi , it helps to resolve the critical issue. It is housing the core enterprise application like jde Edward.
Currently on IBM Power9 servers, we can have more retention by more a optimized SMT8 thread.
3
AS400 administrator.
IT analyst
AS400 developer
  • Power VM has no vulnerability since 2003
  • Backup strategy
  • JDE applications
  • With Power Systems, clients can take advantage of superior core performance
  • memory bandwidth
  • price-performance advantages
  • the new enhanced core
  • more complexity
  • more data to manage and greater pressure to
Because Virtualization and features: The ability to micro-partition and use features like LPM are crucial for us to maximize uptime for our applications.
No
  • Price
  • Product Features
  • Product Usability
  • Product Reputation
  • Prior Experience with the Product
We typically purchase enterprise-class servers, and the POWER9's are fully redundant, which helps reduce any unplanned downtime
I will not change the selection process.
  • Third-party professional services
Chilli services
  • Time taking
  • Co-location support
With built-in virtualization and an ecosystem of open cloud solutions, you can cloud-enable your applications without migration and build a cloud that handles the most data-intensive workloads on earth.
IBM is always ready to help whenever I am opening any case with IBM.
Yes we have purchased premium support as whenever any issue related to iseries we get the quick support from IBM.
No
Quick resolution.
Immediate assistance even with the low priority case.
well explained.
Reply to my question many times.
Provided links to troubleshoot the issue.
They are very secure and do not have many of the security issues as other platforms
  • highly scalable
  • easily clustered
  • powerful and efficient
  • license/manage for the MSP model
  • Need more support from big Cloud providers
  • initial Pricing (offset by TCO).
Yes, but I don't use it
Return to navigation