Overview
What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.
Best Tool for Requirements Management
IBM Rational DOORS Review
IBM Rational Team Concert: Robust Solution for Project Management
Comprehensive application for effective project management
Effective and the Best Agile Management Product and Excellent on Team Collaboration.
A great application for project development.
Testing Process & Management Enforcer
Powerful but Clunky
My day to day RTC life
IBM DOORS can handle your data referencing needs.
Open the DOORS to control your project
RTC Review
Rational DOORS, tool to manage requirements across the SDLC
Rational DNG, not a mature platform to mage requirement
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management (ELM) is an end-to-end engineering solution used to manage system requirements to design, workflow, and test management, extending the functionality of ALM tools for better complex-systems development.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
23 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Jira Software?
JIRA Software is an application lifecycle management solution for software development teams. It allows users to create, prioritize and track the progress of tasks across multiple team members, and offers a wide range of integrations. It is offered via the cloud and local servers.
What is iRise?
iRise offers a prototyping and design platform for software development.
Product Demos
Using IBM Rational Team Concert and IBM Rational Rhapsody for Android development
How to integrate JIRA with IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC)
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management?
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Competitors
IBM Engineering Lifecycle Management Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(57)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-4 of 4)IBM Rational DOORS Review
- Parent to child requirement traceability
- Auto tracking of all changes made to an object
- Ability to create a toolkit to generate documents straight from DOORS
- Linking between DOORS modules using DXL
- Not web based
- Better interface with other tools
- Ability to track requirements approval and sell off
- Easy tracking of requirements
- Common to multiple programs
- Home grown toolkit available
- Ability to generate document straight from DOORS is a big plus.
- Ability to track all changes is a big plus when doing multiple iterations or updates to requirements.
- Need wider use of DOORS by all stakeholders.
Powerful but Clunky
- Stores requirements
- Compatible with HP ALM
- Filters well and is customizable
- Terrible UI and not intuitive
- Too slow to connect to, launch and run
- Scripts to use the features are way too complicated to write and maintain.
- Wastes time to get access, connect.
- Many other tools are faster and easier to use.
- Quality Center (formerly HP Quality Center), Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony), Jira Software and Rally Software (formerly CA Agile Central)
- Easy to use
- Traceability
- Generation of Reports
- Customization to match your implementation
- Can be self documenting and recording of history
- Most reports and queries just display data graphically for trending. It would be nice to be able to easily build tabular reports.
- The application is logistically complex, meaning there are many moving pieces to keep track of. One needs to work with the application learn it. Some people have trouble with this when they are new to RTC and have tight developmental time lines.
- Running the RTC in house requires trained, dedicated staff. Upgrades are difficult and require expert level knowledge.
- Better organization of requirements
- Effective assignment of priorities
- When estimating the size of stories and tasks become predictable, it facilitates sprint planning.
- There is a very positive ROI when a disciplined, mature development team use use the software.
- Professional services company
IBM Rational Team Concert Review
- Dead Lines are clearly assigned through change requests
- Tracking the assignments (Implementation Work Tickets)
- Process
- GUI can be implemented much more efficiently with clarity. I personally feel the current IBM Rational Team Concert is little clumsy.
- Increased employee efficiency is definitely a point to be considered when all the employees are resolving the change requests in a timely manner.
- Change Requests
- Ballets
- Work Tickets
- Change Requests
- Tracking the project
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Prior Experience with the Product
- Implemented in-house
- None
- Ballets, CRs
- Traceability