JaspersoftPricing

Even though the price factor is considered important, we look the product features and its usability … Price/Licenses

needs Feature rich, quick to setup and get it running Ability to customize Cost effective … TIBCO Jaspersoft is a cost-effective solution and it works well for not so complex, large reporting … While this is a cost-effective system, we may have spent more than the required…

and security are the main aspects of this tool which does not lose their value when doing day-to-day operations for data mapping.

Allowed quick decisions to be made. Easy visualisation of cost savings. Reduced meeting time.

Poor at scaling to large volumes of data Pricing model could be better Performance slows dramatically as you reach limits … Very cost-effective and was easy to…

Easy development and deployment. Low cost compared to other competitive products. All in one kind of program with embedded features. Professional level … Selected for it's lower cost.

We evaluated Burst which was very nice but the pricing wasn't in our budget. They actually provided the data warehouse whereas

Price was a big factor. Jaspersoft is well priced compared to Tableau. We found Glow scaled badly. With

clear. Jasper offered exactly what we were looking for, and did so for a price that we were happy with. For a scalable, feature-rich reporting engine that

responsiveness can be sluggish Commercial/account management contacts dont add value … More flexible than Qlik, easier to integrate and cheaper to run. Less polished and ultimately capable than Tableau, but more flexible

the environment and migrating older reports was a plus for us. It is a very cost effective platform as well. … the environment and migrating older reports was a plus for us. It is a very cost effective platform as well.

Success Manager is also offering some on-site workshops, but at a separate cost.

reports and publishing them seamlessly to the server SSO (Single Sign-On) Affordable BI stack … Jaspersoft was the best value proposition for what we needed.

of customization, how well it fit into our environment, feature package, price and performance.

Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience with

with as far as licensing and contract issues. Also relatively much more expensive. We didn't actually even evaluate BIRT as a replacement due to the poor

more oriented on official reports with simple static structure there less expensive solution and reports are easier to build. So I suggest that you create … create some basic jasper reports features package which would be less expensive and would provide much simpler process…

Jaspersoft beats it hands down. We have found Jaspersoft to be faster, cheaper, reliable, flexible, and powerful. And JasperSoft just offers more with … Crystal Reports. Crystal became prohibitively expensive. Further, it was opaque. When it f…

Integration capabilities REST API feature set Multi-tenancy Security controls Cost Export features Customization capabilities

Suite analytics in terms of features; but found to be the leading overall if cost is included.

We selected Jaspersoft because of its cost, the fact that it's a full web-based solution, and for the embedding possibilities

supporting data analysis. I selected Jaspersoft as this seemed to be a mature, cost-effective open source option, and our overall solution was predicated on … Cheaper than its bigger competitors, and reasonable wide…

consistent. Huge complexity, for users and developers. Dashboard features very expensive (almost impossible) to customize.

developers). With other platforms, I think we would need more to get the same value. … roles, we have used Cognos. The cost of Jaspersoft was a huge advantage when we were starting up. We couldn't afford Cognos and since we are proficient

Cost and simplicity. Jaspersoft meets our requirement for ad hoc reporting, but highly lacks in performance and support. Jaspersoft would be an outstanding … Cost and simplicity. Jaspersoft meets our requirement for ad hoc reporting, but