OpenText SiteScope

Formerly Micro Focus SiteScope

Limitation in monitoring physical components: Some users have expressed dissatisfaction with SiteScope as it does not monitor certain physical components such as power supplies, failed hard drives, and array controllers. This limitation may not meet the user's monitoring needs.

Lack of cascading alerting: Several reviewers have mentioned that the alerting system in SiteScope is an all or nothing type and does not offer the capability to configure alerts in a tiered manner. This lack of cascading alerting can be limiting for users who require more flexibility in their alert setup.

Absence of mobile application: Users have pointed out that SiteScope does not have a mobile application, which limits the options for receiving alerts to email and text messages unless integrated with another application. The absence of a dedicated mobile app may be seen as a drawback by some customers.

Users of the software have made several recommendations based on their experiences.

First, many users recommend the software as a reliable and stable solution for workflow automation and performance monitoring. They have found it to be an essential tool in managing their infrastructure and monitoring systems. With its active functionality, it has proven to be a valuable asset in their daily operations.

Second, some users suggest that Micro Focus is a highly demanded tool in the market for experienced individuals. They recommend starting with this software as a stepping stone for a career in automation and believe it offers a reliable future.

Lastly, users highly recommend the software as a good enterprise product for monitoring production-grade applications. They advise implementing it alongside the OMi solution for optimal results. However, some users also suggest considering alternate solutions, indicating that there may be other options worth exploring.