Overview
What is Microsoft Azure?
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
Why choose Azure?
Microsoft Cloud option
"Microsoft Azure is a reliable IaaS and DaaS and a bit of a challenge."
Microsoft Azure is the best cloud solution!
Azure poor customer service
Best Cloud Computing Solution
Microsoft Azure is a Class Unto Itself
Title For MS Azure
MS Azure Practical Use!
Azure is the leader in Cloud Services environment and should be where your next datacenter is built.
MS is a great trusted partner to build your tech on.
You do get what you pay for - if you want to
Azure: How a deallocated $0.11/hr instance cost over $500 in 3 months (Do the math).
Microsoft Azure- Great as PaaS, baby as IaaS
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Popular Features
- Dynamic scaling (16)9.393%
- Elastic load balancing (16)8.888%
- Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime (16)8.787%
- Pre-configured templates (16)7.070%
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Developer
$29
Standard
$100
Professional Direct
$1000
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $29 per month
Product Demos
Microsoft Azure Training - [3] Azure Accounts, Subscriptions and Admin Roles (Exam 70-533)
Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Microsoft Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Azure Tutorial | Simplilearn
Azure Training | Azure Tutorial | Intellipaat
Azure Fundamentals complete Training in telugu
Features
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
IaaS provides the basic building blocks for an IT infrastructure like servers, storage, and networking, in an on-demand model over the Internet
- 8.7Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime(16) Ratings
The service uptime as a percentage defined in the SLA
- 9.3Dynamic scaling(16) Ratings
Ease of scaling up or down in response to customer needs
- 8.8Elastic load balancing(16) Ratings
Automatic balancing and distribution of resources across multiple virtual computers
- 7Pre-configured templates(16) Ratings
Pre-defined templates for virtual machines
- 8Monitoring tools(16) Ratings
Monitoring tools provide alerts when problems are detected
- 8.4Pre-defined machine images(15) Ratings
Range of different server configurations available
- 9.5Operating system support(16) Ratings
Range of operating systems available as pre-configured images
- 9Security controls(16) Ratings
Compliance with security protocols like SSL and AES
- 8.7Automation(15) Ratings
Automation of administrative tasks
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Microsoft Azure?
Azure is a comprehensive computing platform, providing cloud infrastructure, products and services, developer tools, and innovations in data and AI. Azure has on-premises, hybrid, multicloud, and edge capabilities that offer the flexibility to innovate anywhere.
Developers can use their favorite languages, open-source frameworks, and tools to code and deploy. Azure includes over 200 physical datacenters arranged into more than 60 regions and upholds our customers' expectations with data residency, compliance, and high availability.
An example of some of the service areas Azure covers:
AI + Machine Learning
Analytics
Blockchain
Computing
Containers
Databases
Developer Tools
DevOps
Identity
Integration
Internet of Things
Management
Media
Stack
Migration
Mixed Reality
Mobile
Networking
Security
Storage
Web
Windows Virtual Desktop
Microsoft Azure Integrations
- Stackify
- APM+
Microsoft Azure Competitors
- Amazon Web Services
- SAP HANA Cloud
- Google cloud
Microsoft Azure Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(968)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(26-50 of 88)Microsoft Azure - A Huge Set of Services and Abilities, so Just Start With a Small Bite.
- Azure Active Directory is the top of the list. No organization can be without a robust and capable identity management system for the users. having the identities managed in the cloud means that your people can potentially be authenticated to more systems everywhere, allowing more work to get done more securely.
- Azure in general is strong because of how it can scale - not only in terms of scaling up capacity of an individual service, but also scale out to include more connected services to drive more value and solve more problems in the business. The scaled-out solutions with other products will just flat out work with the rest of what you already have in Azure, making the journey easier.
- During our initial stages with Azure (years ago), we had several hybrid scenarios going, where we had portions of a service on-premises while other portions were in Azure. Active Directory was a good example. The Hybrid story got better and better and made "jumping to the cloud" less of an abrupt jump and more of a careful walk. The Hybrid ease has probably only gotten better since then.
- While not unique to just Azure, the truth of the matter is, no on-prem data center at any organization can match the power, speed, and expandability of a cloud service like Azure. If you are a Microsoft shop with lots of Windows, Office, and other related systems running already, moving to Azure (and Office 365 as well) is worth considering.
- I know cost is a barrier for many organizations. The retail prices may seem high and may be out of reach now, but with careful planning and negotiation, along with a realistic sense of what you can do now verses what you could be doing in the future, the costs should even out.
- The Learning Curve. While possibly daunting and new, the general concepts of "the cloud" can be easily mastered. Diving deeper into any given service will provide a normal amount of learning challenges (high, but can be overcome). The biggest thing about the learning curve is learning about all the changes and the speed at which those changes are happening. Managing any of the Azure services is different than managing the equivalent on-premises service. There may be some slight differences, but the pace of change and enhancements and capacity of the Azure equivalence can be very difficulty to wrap your mind around. "Keeping up" is probably a better term than "learning curve" here.
- Although getting better, there is still a sense or fear of an organization "putting all their eggs in one basket", with a single vendor handling so much technology. More support for integration with other cloud services is ramping up, which is good.
Very versatile, but also complex
As with many companies, it is addressing the 'elastic' demands, specially for Dev/PreProd environments... Many times we need to deploy temporary environments for some applications and we don't have enough time to purchase an expansion on our OnPrem environment. Cloud is a great escape for this situation.
Also, It addresses the need of retaining Archived files and Backups for long term. We were able to bring great savings with Data Archiving solution in place today.
- Elasticity - the ability to expand and reduce in a few clicks.
- The huge variety of services it delivers (from VMs, to Containers, Storage, etc.)
- Reliability - if it is properly built, it is highly available.
- Complexity - due to its huge variety of services, it may be complex to implement and manage.
- Latency (performance) - if you don't have good connectivity (MS Express Route recommended for medium/large companies) you can have latency between your on-prem and cloud environments, which makes it not so interesting for some use cases.
For example, in our company, we have a lot of Calculation/Analysis systems, that have significant impacts if running through WAN (due to network latency), as they have millions of interactions between the Workstations and the App Server. In these cases, Cloud is not a good solution for us.
Azure, great for those looking to get to the cloud.
- High Availability
- Ease of use
- Hybrid cloud
- Technical Support
- Open source features are lacking
- Documentation
Microsoft Azure - One stop solution for cloud hosting
- Setup of new server is pretty much simple and easily scalable as per traffic.
- Robust and stable platform so it's a convenient solution for IT infrastructure on cloud.
- Easy to create and manage the cloud assets. Server load controlling is awesome.
- Easily able to build and deploy the applications and servicies.
- Its advance level tasks do require a steep learning curve and more experience.
- Pricing model is a bit costly so if any resource(s) are not in use then cancel it. Yes, cancellation is pretty much quick and simple.
- A few Azure services require additional supporting tools.
- Microsoft Azure is a secure, reliable, highly responsive and scalable platform to host the cloud services.
- Huge servers network available. Integration is easy with other services.
- Web development build, deployment and testing is simple.
- Pricing is a bit high and few tims usage [requires a] high bandwidth.
- Integration with third-party tools is easy.
- Large scale use community exists.
Impressed by Azure's innovation and rapid growth
- It helps to manage all my resources in the azure portal easily.
- Visual studio also provides an option for Azure.
- It also provides GitHub integration to Azure web app deployment and it is simply genius.
- It is simple to implement but documentation could be better
- VM failure is a continuous issue
- Easy to use
- Easy to analyze cost
- .Net applications can be easily deployed on Azure
Microsoft Azure Review
- Provides seamless scale-out of services.
- The service model ensures that we only pay for what we use.
- The available-anywhere nature of the cloud-based services makes it ideal for our increasingly mobile users.
- The service is constantly updated, which is good except that because of these there can be situations where re-training and configuration changes become necessary year-round.
- The service can become pricey if not closely managed and monitored.
- Support quality can be hit-or-miss, seemingly at random based on the experience and ability of the technician that your tickets are assigned to.
Machine Learning
- Microsoft Azure is great for machine learning.
- Microsoft Azure is cheap and user-accessible.
- Microsoft Azure allows for making predictions from large sets of information.
- It is not that user-friendly.
- It requires a lot of data and time to teach algorithms
- The credits can get quite costly for small projects.
Azure, definitely good for a Microsoft-based business.
We also have a website app meant for internal use and use the SendGrid account connector. It is really nice to have easy white-listing for everything: websites, databases, etc. that we can trust. We host everything here instead of making servers VPN into our office.
Additionally, we have a site-to-site VPN between our offices and Azure. That works well and enabled us to turn off much of our public access.
We use the built-in VM backup tools and those have been really easy to use right there on Azure. Also, the snapshots automatically built into databases we have used several times. It creates a new database from a snapshot from every few hours from up to almost 30 days ago and then you just copy over whatever data you need.
.
- Snapshots of databases are just built-in and super easy to choose one to recover from.
- It's the way we sync our local domain controller with Office 365. I'm not aware of another option to do this. It has some limitations, but at least it keeps all the passwords in sync.
- Samba file shares have been really nice. As long as the ISPs involved allow them, it's the easiest way to set up mapped drives shared with others. The performance is slow, but it's fine.
- It is easy to manage the static public and private IPs that are being used, in one central place.
- Adding extra data disks to VMS is nice and easy. The performance has been fine for our general use.
- The AD sync between Office 365 and our controller syncs passwords well enough, but data is a pain. Usually, you have to update everything in AD and can't from anywhere else after you turn on the syncing.
- Need more security controls and file-level access controls on SMB shares, unless I'm missing something.
- More tooltips on settings would be helpful, at least if you turn on a novice mode or something. It's built for system admins and has a steep learning curve for people doing basic things.
- The ability to allocate resources: storage capacity, memory availability and processing power-on-demand dynamically are the main strengths.
- Platform compatibility with leading technologies and international standards.
- Excellent after-sales support is definitely one of the key factors in using Microsoft Azure.
- There is a lot of room for improvement in the pricing schema.
- Regional availability needs to be improved, since some governments regulate that physical data center must sit within their jurisdictional location.
- 'Vendor lock-in' risk might jeopardize the user's bargaining position.
Azure, a familiar home in the cloud
- Speed to market
- Provides a familiar environment for existing Microsoft users
- Good catalog of services
- Some their preview items are not ready for Production
- Even having enterprise support, it can take finesse to find the right contact on certain services
- It suffers from growing pain as it improves.
The best cloud solution
- Responsible customer support
- The web apps work fairly well
- Offers easier creation of hybrid clouds
- Availability of so many services
- A lot of features on beta tests
- Interface still feels overly complicated
- No other issues was identified
Azure, the better choice for business.
- Storage
- VM
- Control
- Price on VMs
- Could be easier to setup redundancy
- Transparent price
Crystal Clear Azure
Azure has allowed us to quickly and reliably connect to information across our network in a seamless fashion. We are able to share links and data very quickly. It also allows us the advantage to use PowerBI to access data from many different departments because they are all in one place.
- Allows large amounts of data to be saved in a logical fashion
- Provides easy access from any intranet or internet connection
- Allows us to handle security in a logical and fluid fashion
- I would like to see more support around video. It is okay for now but distributing the images across a wide audience doesn't allow us to utilize Azure often.
- Permissions and training for new users can be a little daunting. Acceptance is slow when it is presented to a new department or an individual or team that lacks technical expertise. Once we teach them its fine but the 'official' instructions are alternately too complex and off the mark.
It is well suited for a situation that needs to be available 24 hours a day.
It is not appropriate, due to pricing, for small companies - which would benefit by being able to easily share their data.
Azure overview
- Pricing models
- Great security and network resilience
- AD integration
- Lack of stable frameworks or libraries
- No local stored data
- Poor documentation for some areas
Complete package for the cloud experience
- All the apps are quickly configurable by only a few pages of clearly defined options.
- The speed of deployment is incredible - websites, databases and virtual machines are up and running in minutes.
- The product is constantly evolving both in terms of features and user-friendliness.
- The pricing model is too complex, making it difficult to evaluate and compare with different solutions.
- The console is somewhat cluttered compared to, for example, Google Cloud.
- The support is very basic without the extra support plan purchased.
Any company that plans to move its own infrastructure to the cloud should consider Microsoft Azure for the costs reduction together with the security backed by Microsoft.
Azure is an ideal solution
- Is very intuitive.
- Non-developers can easily create a website.
- The Azure developer community is very responsible.
- Good price policy.
- It is a little lengthy process could be a little simple.
- Can sometimes get a little buggy.
- No other issues.
Benefits of Azure
1) Software development: We build software using App Services, AKS, Azure Functions, Event Grid, Sql Server
2) Running our internal programs: We use Logic apps and AKS to run our custom production apps.
3) Hosting SaaS products for our customers: We build products for our customers and run them in AKS and monitor using Microsoft Azure monitor / app insights.
- We really like the PaaS offerings. AKS master node is managed by MS, and we only pay for the nodes.
- Microsoft Azure functions can run be hosted and run inside of Kubernetes. This allows solutions based on Azure functions cloud agnostic.
- New services are added frequently and existing services have features added often. It is hard to keep up.
- Microsoft Azure functions does not have a "Configure Services" method. Programming Azure functions has a slightly different programming model than does a "normal" API application. I would prefer that the startup process be identical.
Azure is simple, easy and too hard to pass up.
- Transparency to what everyone in the Org you support is working on.
- The centralized billing and administrator controls allow us great organization and flexibility to keep things centralized yet virtually based.
- The access to the multitude of options to enhance your cloud performance and experience is unparalleled.
- I don’t like the pre-paid billing. Forking over a boat-load of money up to a year before you use a service is a financial loss for us on the interest.
- Feels as if there are too many options, bells, and whistles you could add.
- With so many options available, it’s really up to you to discover if they are helpful to you or not. Some of the options I’ve never heard of before, and documentation is hard to come by.
Why I wouldn't migrate to Azure again
- Azure Web app seems to be fairly decent
- Some Azure employees really care
- High VM failure rate and limited options in many regions.
- Azure SQL is the single worst product Microsoft has created.
- Lots of basic things can take 45 min (changing the config of a gateway/load balance for example).
- Low pricing flexibility makes AWS 2-3X cheaper.
- VMs with less than 4c/8GB often can't even run windows update or take hours to do so.
- AKS especially flaky with DNS issues, random downtimes.
- Often misses SLAs and requires the customer to ask for credit.
- Lots of recommended solutions for PaaS apps essentially require turning off your firewall.
- API, CLI, ARM are incomplete with diff gaps.
- Docs are out of date and incomplete.
- AG groups put on single node clusters that receive firmware updates at the same time.
- Azure apps for docker require non-TLS termination, violating most security controls by forcing unencrypted traffic from their internal LB to the app workers.
No need of on-prem!
- We can access our server from the dashboard easily.
- No windows license issues.
- Server restarts are really quickly.
- It would be nice to have better level 1 support. As we are in IT, when we are reaching out it is because we have done everything we could.
Microsoft Azure: Next Step to Cloud Hosting
- When we use Azure Web apps, it provides a PAAS solution for our hosting.
- If we have specific tasks to be executed after intervals or continuous work, it provides Web jobs.
- We can move our DB to No SQL as well, which is also very useful.
- For storage purposes, we can use Azure Storage, like blobs in which we can create containers just like S3 buckets in AWS.
- Some times in Web apps we faced an issue that gives us an error while code swapping like it's already in use.
- Azure should provide more detailed errors for activity, also for activity logs. Logs should be searchable on the basis of time duration rather last 3 months.
- Syncing for two different Azure tables should be done parallel to one another.
Probably the best cloud experience ever
- The best and the easiest integration with other Microsoft services.
- Great Web console interface -- good for all advanced and beginner IT specialists.
- Regular security and functionality upgrades.
- Options to try the product/solution absolutely for free to understand if it works for your current environment and company needs.
- Cloud computing -- one of the best options for your virtual environment on the market and if your company has Microsoft based infrastructure - integration with other MS services make this solution the best one.
- And you pay only for what you are using!
- MS technical support -- in most cases is horrible. Unless you use the support of MS partners, but that makes the cost higher.
- Comparing to other competitors on the market, customization of the virtual servers is not the most strong side of Microsoft Azure.
- Prices of services. That needs to be improved. In a small environment it is only so critical, but when you start growing it becomes a significant cost raise.
- We had issues transforming legacy servers and services from physical to virtual based on Azure. We had to use third-party solutions.
Microsoft Azure: a great IAAS partner
- Using Microsoft Azure we now have the ability to expand our product offerings using this cloud service.
- Being elastic in the cloud means, we only have to pay for data and usage as per our consumption needs.
- Using Microsoft Azure as IAAS means that we are freed from the needs of hosting our hardware locally. Important considerations like security and software patching are all handled remotely.
- The pricing for their services need to be made more competitive in comparison to Amazon AWS.
- The product requires a large learning curve and the technical documentation can sometimes be difficult and cumbersome to follow.
Azure is like the other Microsoft products, good and user-friendly, but not the most efficient thing in the world
- Perhaps the biggest advantage of Microsoft Azure is its ease of integration with other Microsoft products. If you're used to using Excel, Access, SQL Server, and other Microsoft products, Azure will fit in nicely.
- Azure does a good job at pointing the user into user-friendly methods for data capture and analysis. In fact, I think Azure does the best job at this compared to competing tools.
- Microsoft Azure has recently made strides in implementing advanced analytics, such as machine learning. Their advances are great and integrate nicely with the tool.
- Microsoft Azure's movement into machine learning and other advanced analytics are somewhat behind the curve. Other tools that have been doing this for a long time have set up easier user interfaces.
- Azure seems to run slower than other big data housing tools. I think this might be because of Microsoft's attempt to make Azure more user-friendly.
- I think Azure could improve its product by making it even more like Microsoft Excel. I know that's not what Azure if for, but hey, it's Microsoft, they could make it more spreadsheet-ish.
Azure CI in a Dynamic Environment
- Wealth of white papers and documents for support
- Every function or process you could need is there
- frequent upgrades and updates to fix any issues
- Sometimes its a bit overwhelming as to the volume of functions
- The layout could be more intuitive
- While there are a lot of support docs it could be laid out a bit better to help you get where you need to go