Overview
What is Microsoft Azure?
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
Why choose Azure?
Microsoft Cloud option
"Microsoft Azure is a reliable IaaS and DaaS and a bit of a challenge."
Microsoft Azure is the best cloud solution!
Azure poor customer service
Best Cloud Computing Solution
Microsoft Azure is a Class Unto Itself
Title For MS Azure
MS Azure Practical Use!
Azure is the leader in Cloud Services environment and should be where your next datacenter is built.
MS is a great trusted partner to build your tech on.
You do get what you pay for - if you want to
Azure: How a deallocated $0.11/hr instance cost over $500 in 3 months (Do the math).
Microsoft Azure- Great as PaaS, baby as IaaS
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Popular Features
- Dynamic scaling (16)9.393%
- Elastic load balancing (16)8.888%
- Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime (16)8.787%
- Pre-configured templates (16)7.070%
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Developer
$29
Standard
$100
Professional Direct
$1000
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $29 per month
Product Demos
Microsoft Azure Training - [3] Azure Accounts, Subscriptions and Admin Roles (Exam 70-533)
Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Microsoft Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Azure Tutorial | Simplilearn
Azure Training | Azure Tutorial | Intellipaat
Azure Fundamentals complete Training in telugu
Features
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
IaaS provides the basic building blocks for an IT infrastructure like servers, storage, and networking, in an on-demand model over the Internet
- 8.7Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime(16) Ratings
The service uptime as a percentage defined in the SLA
- 9.3Dynamic scaling(16) Ratings
Ease of scaling up or down in response to customer needs
- 8.8Elastic load balancing(16) Ratings
Automatic balancing and distribution of resources across multiple virtual computers
- 7Pre-configured templates(16) Ratings
Pre-defined templates for virtual machines
- 8Monitoring tools(16) Ratings
Monitoring tools provide alerts when problems are detected
- 8.4Pre-defined machine images(15) Ratings
Range of different server configurations available
- 9.5Operating system support(16) Ratings
Range of operating systems available as pre-configured images
- 9Security controls(16) Ratings
Compliance with security protocols like SSL and AES
- 8.7Automation(15) Ratings
Automation of administrative tasks
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Microsoft Azure?
Azure is a comprehensive computing platform, providing cloud infrastructure, products and services, developer tools, and innovations in data and AI. Azure has on-premises, hybrid, multicloud, and edge capabilities that offer the flexibility to innovate anywhere.
Developers can use their favorite languages, open-source frameworks, and tools to code and deploy. Azure includes over 200 physical datacenters arranged into more than 60 regions and upholds our customers' expectations with data residency, compliance, and high availability.
An example of some of the service areas Azure covers:
AI + Machine Learning
Analytics
Blockchain
Computing
Containers
Databases
Developer Tools
DevOps
Identity
Integration
Internet of Things
Management
Media
Stack
Migration
Mixed Reality
Mobile
Networking
Security
Storage
Web
Windows Virtual Desktop
Microsoft Azure Integrations
- Stackify
- APM+
Microsoft Azure Competitors
- Amazon Web Services
- SAP HANA Cloud
- Google cloud
Microsoft Azure Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(968)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-18 of 18)Title For MS Azure
- PaaS
- IaaS
- SaaS
- Navigation
- User Interface
- Ease of Learning
Microsoft Azure- Great as PaaS, baby as IaaS
- Azure simply provides end to end life cycle. Starting from the development to automated deployment, you will find [a] bunch of options. Custom hook-points allow [integration] on-premise resources as well.
- Excellent documentation around all the services make it really easy for any novice. Overall support by [the] community and Azure Technical team is exceptional.
- BOT Services, Computer Vision services, ML frameworks provide excellent results as compare to similar services provided by other giants in the same space.
- Azure data services provide excellent support to ingest data from different sources, ETL, and consumption of data for BI purpose.
- The reliability of hardware is low as [compared] to AWS. Sometimes processes of allocation, deallocation of resources take quite a long time without having any intimation. If the instances are costly, such delay in stopping incurs extra cost.
- Overall cost is much higher for ML and BI Services. Basic storage and compute cost is also bit more as compare to AWS.
- Azure can surely do better with overall DevOps support. Cloud formation needs [a] lot more maturity and features.
Small company enjoying the big product
- Ease of use
- Easy implementation
- Smooth functionality
- More extensive video library instead of written documentation
- More customized reporting ability
- Longer "included" vendor support
Microsoft Azure - A Huge Set of Services and Abilities, so Just Start With a Small Bite.
- Azure Active Directory is the top of the list. No organization can be without a robust and capable identity management system for the users. having the identities managed in the cloud means that your people can potentially be authenticated to more systems everywhere, allowing more work to get done more securely.
- Azure in general is strong because of how it can scale - not only in terms of scaling up capacity of an individual service, but also scale out to include more connected services to drive more value and solve more problems in the business. The scaled-out solutions with other products will just flat out work with the rest of what you already have in Azure, making the journey easier.
- During our initial stages with Azure (years ago), we had several hybrid scenarios going, where we had portions of a service on-premises while other portions were in Azure. Active Directory was a good example. The Hybrid story got better and better and made "jumping to the cloud" less of an abrupt jump and more of a careful walk. The Hybrid ease has probably only gotten better since then.
- While not unique to just Azure, the truth of the matter is, no on-prem data center at any organization can match the power, speed, and expandability of a cloud service like Azure. If you are a Microsoft shop with lots of Windows, Office, and other related systems running already, moving to Azure (and Office 365 as well) is worth considering.
- I know cost is a barrier for many organizations. The retail prices may seem high and may be out of reach now, but with careful planning and negotiation, along with a realistic sense of what you can do now verses what you could be doing in the future, the costs should even out.
- The Learning Curve. While possibly daunting and new, the general concepts of "the cloud" can be easily mastered. Diving deeper into any given service will provide a normal amount of learning challenges (high, but can be overcome). The biggest thing about the learning curve is learning about all the changes and the speed at which those changes are happening. Managing any of the Azure services is different than managing the equivalent on-premises service. There may be some slight differences, but the pace of change and enhancements and capacity of the Azure equivalence can be very difficulty to wrap your mind around. "Keeping up" is probably a better term than "learning curve" here.
- Although getting better, there is still a sense or fear of an organization "putting all their eggs in one basket", with a single vendor handling so much technology. More support for integration with other cloud services is ramping up, which is good.
Microsoft Azure - One stop solution for cloud hosting
- Setup of new server is pretty much simple and easily scalable as per traffic.
- Robust and stable platform so it's a convenient solution for IT infrastructure on cloud.
- Easy to create and manage the cloud assets. Server load controlling is awesome.
- Easily able to build and deploy the applications and servicies.
- Its advance level tasks do require a steep learning curve and more experience.
- Pricing model is a bit costly so if any resource(s) are not in use then cancel it. Yes, cancellation is pretty much quick and simple.
- A few Azure services require additional supporting tools.
- Microsoft Azure is a secure, reliable, highly responsive and scalable platform to host the cloud services.
- Huge servers network available. Integration is easy with other services.
- Web development build, deployment and testing is simple.
- Pricing is a bit high and few tims usage [requires a] high bandwidth.
- Integration with third-party tools is easy.
- Large scale use community exists.
Machine Learning
- Microsoft Azure is great for machine learning.
- Microsoft Azure is cheap and user-accessible.
- Microsoft Azure allows for making predictions from large sets of information.
- It is not that user-friendly.
- It requires a lot of data and time to teach algorithms
- The credits can get quite costly for small projects.
Azure, definitely good for a Microsoft-based business.
We also have a website app meant for internal use and use the SendGrid account connector. It is really nice to have easy white-listing for everything: websites, databases, etc. that we can trust. We host everything here instead of making servers VPN into our office.
Additionally, we have a site-to-site VPN between our offices and Azure. That works well and enabled us to turn off much of our public access.
We use the built-in VM backup tools and those have been really easy to use right there on Azure. Also, the snapshots automatically built into databases we have used several times. It creates a new database from a snapshot from every few hours from up to almost 30 days ago and then you just copy over whatever data you need.
.
- Snapshots of databases are just built-in and super easy to choose one to recover from.
- It's the way we sync our local domain controller with Office 365. I'm not aware of another option to do this. It has some limitations, but at least it keeps all the passwords in sync.
- Samba file shares have been really nice. As long as the ISPs involved allow them, it's the easiest way to set up mapped drives shared with others. The performance is slow, but it's fine.
- It is easy to manage the static public and private IPs that are being used, in one central place.
- Adding extra data disks to VMS is nice and easy. The performance has been fine for our general use.
- The AD sync between Office 365 and our controller syncs passwords well enough, but data is a pain. Usually, you have to update everything in AD and can't from anywhere else after you turn on the syncing.
- Need more security controls and file-level access controls on SMB shares, unless I'm missing something.
- More tooltips on settings would be helpful, at least if you turn on a novice mode or something. It's built for system admins and has a steep learning curve for people doing basic things.
Azure overview
- Pricing models
- Great security and network resilience
- AD integration
- Lack of stable frameworks or libraries
- No local stored data
- Poor documentation for some areas
Complete package for the cloud experience
- All the apps are quickly configurable by only a few pages of clearly defined options.
- The speed of deployment is incredible - websites, databases and virtual machines are up and running in minutes.
- The product is constantly evolving both in terms of features and user-friendliness.
- The pricing model is too complex, making it difficult to evaluate and compare with different solutions.
- The console is somewhat cluttered compared to, for example, Google Cloud.
- The support is very basic without the extra support plan purchased.
Any company that plans to move its own infrastructure to the cloud should consider Microsoft Azure for the costs reduction together with the security backed by Microsoft.
Microsoft Azure: a great IAAS partner
- Using Microsoft Azure we now have the ability to expand our product offerings using this cloud service.
- Being elastic in the cloud means, we only have to pay for data and usage as per our consumption needs.
- Using Microsoft Azure as IAAS means that we are freed from the needs of hosting our hardware locally. Important considerations like security and software patching are all handled remotely.
- The pricing for their services need to be made more competitive in comparison to Amazon AWS.
- The product requires a large learning curve and the technical documentation can sometimes be difficult and cumbersome to follow.
Azure is like the other Microsoft products, good and user-friendly, but not the most efficient thing in the world
- Perhaps the biggest advantage of Microsoft Azure is its ease of integration with other Microsoft products. If you're used to using Excel, Access, SQL Server, and other Microsoft products, Azure will fit in nicely.
- Azure does a good job at pointing the user into user-friendly methods for data capture and analysis. In fact, I think Azure does the best job at this compared to competing tools.
- Microsoft Azure has recently made strides in implementing advanced analytics, such as machine learning. Their advances are great and integrate nicely with the tool.
- Microsoft Azure's movement into machine learning and other advanced analytics are somewhat behind the curve. Other tools that have been doing this for a long time have set up easier user interfaces.
- Azure seems to run slower than other big data housing tools. I think this might be because of Microsoft's attempt to make Azure more user-friendly.
- I think Azure could improve its product by making it even more like Microsoft Excel. I know that's not what Azure if for, but hey, it's Microsoft, they could make it more spreadsheet-ish.
Useful range of products!
- Scalable pricing -- The Azure pricing scales with usage, so the cost per month becomes very clear early on, and the ML-related products for Azure are quite competitively priced.
- Security management on Microsoft Azure is better compared to other cloud platforms I've seen, and it's really easy to configure.
- Startup Programs -- It's easy to get credits to try out Microsoft Azure through the Microsoft/Azure for Startups program. No other service provides this access and support for startups for free.
- Poor documentation -- Microsoft's documentation can take a while to get used to, as the format and tutorials are a bit different compared to AWS and other cloud computing platforms.
- Some code interfaces/SDKs are not well-designed. Specifically, the Python and Java SDKs can be quite difficult to integrate.
- It's difficult to onboard, due to the lack of beginner-oriented documentation for some of the ML products. Some of the products require extensive knowledge of how to use Azure in production.
- It is great for all services like
- Iaas, Paas, Saas.
- It has an awesome speed of deployment, operation, and scalability which makes the work productive.
- Easy data migration makes it easier to integrate into the system and since all of our systems is Windows based it was much easier.
- Fully integrated Delivery Pipeline.
- Definitely the price. It is expensive when compared to its other competitors
- Another improvement that can be done is in the area of Application. Application insight can be made more to easy to migration to the logging from on-premise to cloud.
- Since it is huge it has got a number of bugs which sometimes troubles. So more documentation and the bug-free system would be an area of improvement.
- It helped in the migration of data.
- Testing our sites, services, and applications.
- Since we are more focused on research and development of our Analytical system its server reliability and ease of deployment makes our life easier.
- And also being used in the only department we have a small number of people so anyone able to deploy helps.
- Since we are working with excel or you can say Office 365, Azure work with it seamlessly which makes it an ideal solution.
Azure is....
- high interoperability
- less cost
- high performance
- should make it more affordable
- lack of technical support
- function complicate for decision makers
Windows Azure - Futuristic Public Cloud
The reason to choose Azure was:
a) We can't afford to have any downtime of our application
b) At any point of time, user should need feel that application is behaving slow.
c) We would like to focus more on our line of business application instead of investing time in monitoring and deployment.
- Azure service fabric is a great platform if you have plan to use micro service framework.
- Azure Active directory is cool if you don't want to manage your own sts.
- New Azure management portal is much better than old one.
- Automating the build using ARM template is still not that state forward, we end up using power shell.
Needs Improvement: If you are not a Microsoft shop then there is still very little you can do here apart from using VM.
Cloud Cover with Azure
- Easy to use identity providers such as Facebook, Google.
- High availability
- Ability to target regions of the world
- Better UI
- PAAS: we are a Microsoft shop so there were some benefits for us in the offering from a platform standpoint
- Reduction in CapEx expenditures for servers, data center environments
- Reduction in Expenses for warranty, maintenance, etc.
- Greatly reduced provisiing cycle for server assets
- Built in disaster recovery
- Lays the foundation for continuous deployment of software changes without bring down te application service (SaaS)
- Bandwidth. It's internet based access . . . . .
- Can't really have dedicated links to Azure so that is a little unsettling from a reliability and QoS (Quality of Service) standpoint.
- No a silver bullet. You will need to really analyze your applications and determine which ones are best suited for this offering. Still plan on hybrid cloud architecture.
- Data costs: when you really crunch the numbers you can spend a lot for data retrieval/storage depending on the scenario. Pay attention to your data flows and retention.
If you are a .Net development shop, look no further. Solid services, constantly being improved and made cheaper.
I used an Azure SQL Database for the website's membership (login) data. Again, worked great.
I configured the SQL Database for weekly automatic export to an Azure Storage account for backup purposes. The export ran without issue 99.999% of the time. There were a couple instances, over the course of a couple years, in which the export failed and I received an email to this effect. In these cases, I went into the Azure portal and reran the export manually.
I used Azure Service Bus Queues to queue email jobs. Email jobs were generated by the website when users used a "send invitation" function to email an invite to friends. Email jobs were also generated by a separate back end process that ran on-premises, and not on Azure. Another on-premises back end process pulled the email jobs from the Azure Service Bus queue and sent out the emails. The Azure Service Bus queue worked great and was very solid. The Service Bus Queue API used to enqueue and dequeue jobs took a little time to understand, but beyond the learning curve, I had no problems with it. Very solid.
I would highly recommend Azure. Besides the solid performance of the services that I used, they are constantly pushing prices down, evolving the existing services, and rolling out new services. New announcements of lower prices and service improvements come nearly every two weeks. It is a very impressive operation, top to bottom, from the physical data centers to the website portal that you use to interact and configure your services.
- Competitive and aggressive pricing
- Constantly evolving and improving services
- If you are a .Net shop, it fits you hand-in-glove
- I'd use more services if they cost even less than they do
- Some services are confusing and difficult to understand, such as Web Roles and Web Workers. Sometimes I wonder if I should/could be using these, but I don't quite understand them.