Overview
What is Microsoft Azure?
Microsoft Azure is a cloud computing platform and infrastructure for building, deploying, and managing applications and services through a global network of Microsoft-managed datacenters.
Why choose Azure?
Microsoft Cloud option
"Microsoft Azure is a reliable IaaS and DaaS and a bit of a challenge."
Microsoft Azure is the best cloud solution!
Azure poor customer service
Best Cloud Computing Solution
Microsoft Azure is a Class Unto Itself
Title For MS Azure
MS Azure Practical Use!
Azure is the leader in Cloud Services environment and should be where your next datacenter is built.
MS is a great trusted partner to build your tech on.
You do get what you pay for - if you want to
Azure: How a deallocated $0.11/hr instance cost over $500 in 3 months (Do the math).
Microsoft Azure- Great as PaaS, baby as IaaS
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Popular Features
- Dynamic scaling (16)9.393%
- Elastic load balancing (16)8.888%
- Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime (16)8.787%
- Pre-configured templates (16)7.070%
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Developer
$29
Standard
$100
Professional Direct
$1000
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Starting price (does not include set up fee)
- $29 per month
Product Demos
Microsoft Azure Training - [3] Azure Accounts, Subscriptions and Admin Roles (Exam 70-533)
Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Microsoft Azure Tutorial For Beginners | Azure Tutorial | Simplilearn
Azure Training | Azure Tutorial | Intellipaat
Azure Fundamentals complete Training in telugu
Features
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
IaaS provides the basic building blocks for an IT infrastructure like servers, storage, and networking, in an on-demand model over the Internet
- 8.7Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime(16) Ratings
The service uptime as a percentage defined in the SLA
- 9.3Dynamic scaling(16) Ratings
Ease of scaling up or down in response to customer needs
- 8.8Elastic load balancing(16) Ratings
Automatic balancing and distribution of resources across multiple virtual computers
- 7Pre-configured templates(16) Ratings
Pre-defined templates for virtual machines
- 8Monitoring tools(16) Ratings
Monitoring tools provide alerts when problems are detected
- 8.4Pre-defined machine images(15) Ratings
Range of different server configurations available
- 9.5Operating system support(16) Ratings
Range of operating systems available as pre-configured images
- 9Security controls(16) Ratings
Compliance with security protocols like SSL and AES
- 8.7Automation(15) Ratings
Automation of administrative tasks
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is Microsoft Azure?
Azure is a comprehensive computing platform, providing cloud infrastructure, products and services, developer tools, and innovations in data and AI. Azure has on-premises, hybrid, multicloud, and edge capabilities that offer the flexibility to innovate anywhere.
Developers can use their favorite languages, open-source frameworks, and tools to code and deploy. Azure includes over 200 physical datacenters arranged into more than 60 regions and upholds our customers' expectations with data residency, compliance, and high availability.
An example of some of the service areas Azure covers:
AI + Machine Learning
Analytics
Blockchain
Computing
Containers
Databases
Developer Tools
DevOps
Identity
Integration
Internet of Things
Management
Media
Stack
Migration
Mixed Reality
Mobile
Networking
Security
Storage
Web
Windows Virtual Desktop
Microsoft Azure Integrations
- Stackify
- APM+
Microsoft Azure Competitors
- Amazon Web Services
- SAP HANA Cloud
- Google cloud
Microsoft Azure Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(968)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-25 of 39)Where Infinite Possibilities Meet Cloud Nine
- DevOps is a really powerful tool for software development
- The PaaS is reliable and fast
- The IaaS is outstanding, you can use it hybrid
- The load balancing works well
- In my opinion, Microsoft Azure's pricing structure is too complex, too many pricing models
- In my experience, sometimes bad documentation and support
- In my opinion, the hybrid cloud is too complex
- Azure provides many free tools, such as QuickStart templates and the Azure SDK. It simplifies the process of creating apps for programmers.
- A large group of people uses the same tools to collaborate and find solutions to problems that they are all facing simultaneously.
- Setting up a repository for our work and making our code publicly available are made simple by Azure's built-in support for Git.
- Recovering from DRSync server failures is not always easy. Upon completion of the fail-back, our on-premises servers became unresponsive. After the fail-back, we must restart our servers.
- 5TB is insufficient for file synchronization per directory. Unfortunately, technical support is not up to standard. Customizing WVD images is still a challenge.
Microsoft Azure is the best cloud solution!
- Azure has wide range of services such as network, compute, storage, etc.
- Excellent customer services support.
- Excellent user training and documentation.
- Excellent user interface and services.
- Cost will be challenge for small and mid-sized organizations.
- Some resources are quite high on prices.
- Services such as cognitive services requires much internet bandwidth and costs.
Microsoft Azure is a Class Unto Itself
- Over time, Microsoft has established itself as a reliable technology partner, providing useful analysis tools such as compute, bandwidth, and memory usage statistics.
- I prefer Azure Functions over AWS because it is cheaper and easier to use than AWS for ready-to-go services. It's simple to ship Node.js functions without any additional dependencies.
- Using Microsoft's tuning techniques, its applications are always improving in terms of both functionality and usability.
- The UI is intuitive and includes multiple Microsoft tools, and the service integration and implementation for various solutions are excellent.
- The cost of resources is difficult to determine, technical documentation is frequently out of date, and documentation and mapping capabilities are lacking.
- The documentation needs to be improved, and some advanced configuration options require research and experimentation.
- Microsoft's licensing scheme is too complex for the average user, and Azure SQL syntax is too different from traditional SQL.
MS Azure Practical Use!
- Cloud Networking
- SD WAN access with Azure
- Cloud Computing | Pools/Farms for Virtual Desktop Infrastructure
- Azure AD for authentication and extending domains
- Pricing
- Subscriptions model
- Phone Support / Technical Support
We are using MS Azure platform to host clients mobile apps, users can access and distribute application from same platform making it really easy to use, maintain and update.
Azure is the leader in Cloud Services environment and should be where your next datacenter is built.
- Provisioning
- Backup
- Maintenance
- Virtual Desktop/Environments
- Storage
- Documentation
- Consistency of location of settings
- Networking Diagrams and settings
MS is a great trusted partner to build your tech on.
It addresses customer usability and comfort as well as optimizing device maintenance and service costs.
- Microsoft has become over time a trusted technology partner
- Good to work together on solving and finding the fitting technical solution
- The IOPS of the VM offerings is inferior compared to competition, cause bottlenecks on IOPS intensive loads
- From what I've seen, resources like VGPU are more accessible than other services.
- For windows VPNs they are perhaps the most affordable.
- Sales is present but not pushy.
- Billing information is scarce to the point of negligence.
- Cost analysis and per-service cost is misleading, if not outright false.
- Billing support is in no hurry to answer specific questions, let alone resolve anything. Expect an automated email with links to vaguely similar documentation topics.
Microsoft Azure- Great as PaaS, baby as IaaS
- Azure simply provides end to end life cycle. Starting from the development to automated deployment, you will find [a] bunch of options. Custom hook-points allow [integration] on-premise resources as well.
- Excellent documentation around all the services make it really easy for any novice. Overall support by [the] community and Azure Technical team is exceptional.
- BOT Services, Computer Vision services, ML frameworks provide excellent results as compare to similar services provided by other giants in the same space.
- Azure data services provide excellent support to ingest data from different sources, ETL, and consumption of data for BI purpose.
- The reliability of hardware is low as [compared] to AWS. Sometimes processes of allocation, deallocation of resources take quite a long time without having any intimation. If the instances are costly, such delay in stopping incurs extra cost.
- Overall cost is much higher for ML and BI Services. Basic storage and compute cost is also bit more as compare to AWS.
- Azure can surely do better with overall DevOps support. Cloud formation needs [a] lot more maturity and features.
Small company enjoying the big product
- Ease of use
- Easy implementation
- Smooth functionality
- More extensive video library instead of written documentation
- More customized reporting ability
- Longer "included" vendor support
Microsoft Azure has it all
- Integrate with programs.
- Automate process.
- Super secure cloud.
- Learn how to use it.
- So many options that we could miss one.
Azure provides a great service, particularly for companies with an existing Microsoft investment.
- Cloud directory service, enabling single-sign-on and application integration with a directory source
- Integrating user identities without providing access to the company’s internal Directory Service from outside of the network/security perimeter.
- Easy management from anywhere via internet access and a browser.
- Not a fan of MS’s implementation of SAML via ADFS. A few inconsistencies in comparison to other industry-standard implementations.
- Documentation: We had tons of trouble at first, resolving issues with Federating identities and using across platforms with MS Office and other platforms. MS was aware, but information across their different cloud teams wasn’t well-shared at the time and made for long hours troubleshooting and resolving issues.
Cloud is Commoditized, but Azure Stands Out
- Azure Functions is the easiest serverless service to work with in my experience. Easy to ship Node.js functions without bundling dependencies.
- Proactive and responsive support. We've worked with most other cloud providers - Amazon, Google, Oracle. Amazon Web Services' customer support is a black hole and their documentation is worthless. Google and Oracle are better, but Azure's support is responsive and their docs are pretty good.
- Azure's Web UI is pretty easy to work with
- In our experience, Azure Kubernetes Survice was difficult to set up, which is why we used Kubernetes on top of VMs.
- Azure REST API is a bit difficult to use, which made it difficult for us to automate our interactions with Azure.
- Azure's Web UI does a good job of showing metrics on individual VMs, but it would be great if there was a way to show certain metrics from multiple VMs on one dashboard. For example, hard drive usage on our database VMs.
Microsoft Azure one stop easy cloud solution
- To run the application in Cloud services and host in web servers.
- To create virtual machine on the need basis and destroy after its use.
- To create secure database in cloud to have easy access.
- Identifying the cost of the resources is not straight forward.
- Configuring firewalls and restricting access to the virtual machine is time consuming.
- Need to improve the documentation to help creating the resources easily.
- Advanced support and telemetry capabilities
- Intuitive UI integrated with multiple tools from Microsoft (i.e. Visual Studio, PowerShell)
- Fantastic scalability and performance
- Great integration capabilities across all services
- Rapid implementations speed for multiple solution types
- Fast pace of tech advancements means that technical documentation is often outdated
- Some advanced configuration options require research and experimentation
- Azure SQL syntax is a too far of a departure from the classic SQL
- Infrastructure documentation and mapping capabilities are lacking
- Microsoft's licensing model is too complex for a regular user to figure out
Azure, great for those looking to get to the cloud.
- High Availability
- Ease of use
- Hybrid cloud
- Technical Support
- Open source features are lacking
- Documentation
Impressed by Azure's innovation and rapid growth
- It helps to manage all my resources in the azure portal easily.
- Visual studio also provides an option for Azure.
- It also provides GitHub integration to Azure web app deployment and it is simply genius.
- It is simple to implement but documentation could be better
- VM failure is a continuous issue
- Easy to use
- Easy to analyze cost
- .Net applications can be easily deployed on Azure
- The ability to allocate resources: storage capacity, memory availability and processing power-on-demand dynamically are the main strengths.
- Platform compatibility with leading technologies and international standards.
- Excellent after-sales support is definitely one of the key factors in using Microsoft Azure.
- There is a lot of room for improvement in the pricing schema.
- Regional availability needs to be improved, since some governments regulate that physical data center must sit within their jurisdictional location.
- 'Vendor lock-in' risk might jeopardize the user's bargaining position.
Azure, a familiar home in the cloud
- Speed to market
- Provides a familiar environment for existing Microsoft users
- Good catalog of services
- Some their preview items are not ready for Production
- Even having enterprise support, it can take finesse to find the right contact on certain services
- It suffers from growing pain as it improves.
Crystal Clear Azure
Azure has allowed us to quickly and reliably connect to information across our network in a seamless fashion. We are able to share links and data very quickly. It also allows us the advantage to use PowerBI to access data from many different departments because they are all in one place.
- Allows large amounts of data to be saved in a logical fashion
- Provides easy access from any intranet or internet connection
- Allows us to handle security in a logical and fluid fashion
- I would like to see more support around video. It is okay for now but distributing the images across a wide audience doesn't allow us to utilize Azure often.
- Permissions and training for new users can be a little daunting. Acceptance is slow when it is presented to a new department or an individual or team that lacks technical expertise. Once we teach them its fine but the 'official' instructions are alternately too complex and off the mark.
It is well suited for a situation that needs to be available 24 hours a day.
It is not appropriate, due to pricing, for small companies - which would benefit by being able to easily share their data.
Azure overview
- Pricing models
- Great security and network resilience
- AD integration
- Lack of stable frameworks or libraries
- No local stored data
- Poor documentation for some areas
Benefits of Azure
1) Software development: We build software using App Services, AKS, Azure Functions, Event Grid, Sql Server
2) Running our internal programs: We use Logic apps and AKS to run our custom production apps.
3) Hosting SaaS products for our customers: We build products for our customers and run them in AKS and monitor using Microsoft Azure monitor / app insights.
- We really like the PaaS offerings. AKS master node is managed by MS, and we only pay for the nodes.
- Microsoft Azure functions can run be hosted and run inside of Kubernetes. This allows solutions based on Azure functions cloud agnostic.
- New services are added frequently and existing services have features added often. It is hard to keep up.
- Microsoft Azure functions does not have a "Configure Services" method. Programming Azure functions has a slightly different programming model than does a "normal" API application. I would prefer that the startup process be identical.
Azure is simple, easy and too hard to pass up.
- Transparency to what everyone in the Org you support is working on.
- The centralized billing and administrator controls allow us great organization and flexibility to keep things centralized yet virtually based.
- The access to the multitude of options to enhance your cloud performance and experience is unparalleled.
- I don’t like the pre-paid billing. Forking over a boat-load of money up to a year before you use a service is a financial loss for us on the interest.
- Feels as if there are too many options, bells, and whistles you could add.
- With so many options available, it’s really up to you to discover if they are helpful to you or not. Some of the options I’ve never heard of before, and documentation is hard to come by.
Why I wouldn't migrate to Azure again
- Azure Web app seems to be fairly decent
- Some Azure employees really care
- High VM failure rate and limited options in many regions.
- Azure SQL is the single worst product Microsoft has created.
- Lots of basic things can take 45 min (changing the config of a gateway/load balance for example).
- Low pricing flexibility makes AWS 2-3X cheaper.
- VMs with less than 4c/8GB often can't even run windows update or take hours to do so.
- AKS especially flaky with DNS issues, random downtimes.
- Often misses SLAs and requires the customer to ask for credit.
- Lots of recommended solutions for PaaS apps essentially require turning off your firewall.
- API, CLI, ARM are incomplete with diff gaps.
- Docs are out of date and incomplete.
- AG groups put on single node clusters that receive firmware updates at the same time.
- Azure apps for docker require non-TLS termination, violating most security controls by forcing unencrypted traffic from their internal LB to the app workers.
Probably the best cloud experience ever
- The best and the easiest integration with other Microsoft services.
- Great Web console interface -- good for all advanced and beginner IT specialists.
- Regular security and functionality upgrades.
- Options to try the product/solution absolutely for free to understand if it works for your current environment and company needs.
- Cloud computing -- one of the best options for your virtual environment on the market and if your company has Microsoft based infrastructure - integration with other MS services make this solution the best one.
- And you pay only for what you are using!
- MS technical support -- in most cases is horrible. Unless you use the support of MS partners, but that makes the cost higher.
- Comparing to other competitors on the market, customization of the virtual servers is not the most strong side of Microsoft Azure.
- Prices of services. That needs to be improved. In a small environment it is only so critical, but when you start growing it becomes a significant cost raise.
- We had issues transforming legacy servers and services from physical to virtual based on Azure. We had to use third-party solutions.