MIP Fund AccountingPricing

on-premise system that we use now. I think the cloud version might be good but the cost is also a factor when trying to decide on what to use.

of new software. We plan to stay with MIP as long as we can continue to afford it! Hopefully, there are not a lot of governmental funding cuts in the

members to learn. But would be nice to have that support without the major cost of the training. … for training is tough to get started too. Because the trainings can be expensive and our organization doesn't want to pay for them all the time.

small business as there are so many features that they would not need for the cost to them, at least not the versions we use. … associated with production, we no longer have to waste time with ledgers and the cost saved in time for our finance has been more than worth it. Since…

I am not in charge of this decision … I am not in charge of purchasing software

overall financials, especially where it can be customized. MIP is getting expensive each yearly costs goes up.

Do you need a lot of cost centers and coding dimensions? Abila MIP Fund Accounting does this well. … compliance reporting. It was purchased to allow for reporting by cost allocation to multiple cost centers, including both internal departments and grants. The … Cost allocation. Allows great flexibility in the setup of…

Reduction in the use of paper is a huge cost savings

It has reduced cost in finance team. Improved accounting process. … We chose MIP Fund Accounting for a better cost especially for non-profit industry over Quickbooks.

I prefer MIP to the other software I have been exposed to based on cost, ease of use, and functionality. I have tried Blackbaud about 14 years ago

Best VALUE for your money!

We have a fairly complex cost allocation process and MIP Fund Accounting works well to reduce the staff … Cost allocation … Cost allocation Budgeting

organization cost plays a very important role in deciding product selection. MIP has adequate product features to suit our needs at a very reasonable price and … User Licensing fee & annual maintenance fees … It provi…

well designed chart of accounts allow for reliable reports with detailed cost structures to track and analyze multiple funding sources. The importing features … systems that are available. However I still feel MIP still give you the best value for the money and the user friendly…

billing and operations departments. It is also used by our department in charge of ordering supplies to keep track of past invoices. … It works well for what we need, is cost-effective and the vendor tracking is superior to others we have lo…

product. One of the major cons of this software is the cost of acquisition and implementation. The cost of this software can increase substantially based on … planning, and decision-making. In addition, this fund accounting software affords us the opportunity to manage several projects at the same time and enables … organizations that can utilize all or most of what this softwar…

I would check other similar software options and look at pricing comparatively.

Positive Cost-effective

Enables accountability of cost center managers

IT server which needed to be replaced. The cost of the product switched to a monthly fee which increased cost somewhat but probably is matched with IT savings … you have good takeaways to save time and understand your options, but the cost is an issue. The year that a "season pass" was offered for all the training … huge timesaver and increased the accuracy and consis…

It is easy to use and does not cost much.

for classes for training and I feel it should have been included in the price of the program. Not for a limited time. When I look at the manuals I have

Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Prior Experience with

Cost allocate among multiple grants Time and Attendance reporting for multiple … Price Product Features Product Usability

This product is a very cost-effective solution that meets the accounting and reporting needs of my organization … MIP Fund Accounting was a more cost-effective solution. I did not like that Blackbaud was not developing an integrated