Overview
What is SharePoint?
Microsoft's SharePoint is an Intranet solution that enables users to share and manage content, knowledge, and applications to empower teamwork, quickly find information, and collaborate across the organization.
Yurtle the turtle rates Microsoft SharePoint
Microsoft SharePoint Simplified
Collaborate to Liberate - SharePoint is the way.
Amazing Software for Real Time Collaboration and File Sharing
Microsoft SharePoint to manage all your work
A beginner look at some points I would like to share!!
A fantastic collaborative tool
Good Investment for Cloud Sharing
Microsoft can do better
Make a website for your team
MS Share Point - 1 Yr uses review
"Innovate, create, and solve with SharePoint."
Take a quick look, find out more ..
MS SharePoint for file editing and storage
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Pricing
Plan 1
$5.00
Plan 2
$10.00
Office 365 E3
$20.00
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is SharePoint?
MS SharePoint / SQL refers to Microsoft Sharepoint, a web-based collaborative platform, being used in tandem with Microsoft SQL Server to provide business intelligence analytics and reporting. They can provide BI content such as data connections, reports, scorecards, dashboards, and more.
With Sharepoint, users can share files, data, news, and resources. Sites can be customized to streamline teams’ work. Team members can collaborate inside and outside the organization, across PCs, Macs, and mobile devices.
Sharepoint also supports the ability to discover data, expertise, and insights to inform decisions and guide action. SharePoint’s content management features, along with connections and conversations surfaced in Yammer, enable organizations to maximize their velocity of knowledge.
Users can also accelerate productivity by transforming processes—from tasks like notifications and approvals to operational workflows. With SharePoint lists and libraries, Microsoft Flow, and PowerApps, they can create digital experiences with forms, workflows, and custom apps for every device.
SharePoint Videos
SharePoint Integrations
SharePoint Competitors
SharePoint Technical Details
Deployment Types | Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based |
---|---|
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(2412)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(26-50 of 191)Workflow Automation Made Simple
- Automate workflows.
- House content across functions.
- Provide knowledge-sharing capabilities.
- UI is pretty basic and not really sleek.
- Clunky backend.
- Search functionality could be improved.
Reliable, time saving, increased productivity
- Document collaboration - people can add and edit at the same time, meaning less time wasted and no need to email versions.
- Integration into Microsoft Teams e.g. you can open a PowerPoint straight from SharePoint into Team and documents can be shared and stored.
- Links to all the MS Apps for easy navigation.
- Some of the online versions of applications don't work as well as the desktop apps e.g. format of documents look weird, not as many options, limited copying, etc.
- The UI/UX is quite clunky if you're not used to it.
Well suited for organisations with a clear structure/looking to implement one for documentation/knowledge
UX/UI can be confusing, so getting initial buy-in within an org can be challenging and may take longer than expected
Microsoft Sharepoint in Azure
- AD integration
- Granular security access
- File lock to support access by multiple users
- Better integrated version control with regression and comments would be useful
Microsoft SharePoint has been great for our company!
- The platform itself is very user friendly.
- I like the customizable designs this helps keep people interested in visiting the pages.
- I like that I can send custom links to particular documents if needed.
- I wish it were a little easier to move everything from One Drive to Share Point.
- I wish it were possible to disable groups from appearing on the home page that you no longer use without losing the information.
- More videos in the support center.
SharePoint- A great CMS for creating Web Applications
We are using it for Intranet as well as for publishing website. Document workflows can be made easily with out of box features provided. It is being used by the users of IT as well as business department. It can be integrated with SQL server reporting services for displaying reports.
- SharePoint is customizable. One can customize the SharePoint according to its needs and requirements.
- SharePoint can integrate with softwares like MS Office, and other existing business ERP systems.
- SharePoint has a extensive list of out of box features like document library, wokflow management, content management, task management and much more.
- Customization in SharePoint is tough. It requires skilled resource to maintain and customize SharePoint.
- Configuring search in SharePoint is difficult.
- SharePoint on premise requires a higher configuration server to work easily.
SharePoint is less appropriate where there is heavy customization involved.
SharePoint review by Senior Solution Architect
Currently, in our organization, we use SharePoint Online which is part of Microsoft 365 and we have implemented company's Intranet portal using SharePoint.
- Collaboration.
- Content Management.
- Intranets.
- Security.
- Document Management.
- Too many good features to choose from.
- Developer Story has room for improvement.
- Does not have a good relational database store that can scale. However, it is excellent for document management and collaboration.
Collaboration
Intranets
Document Management
Less Appropriate: Public-facing websites and e-commerce sites
SharePoint for Information Collaboration Management
- A single version of the truth
- A repository for current project materials
- An organizational tool for several lines of business
- Management overview of the project
- Communication enhancement between team members
- Tracking of issues and resolution
SharePoint has been used in this application for about a year. It is currently used by about 70 people consisting of:
- Internal employees
- Internal IT resources
- Contracted support and operational teams
- Specialized consulting resources
- Organizational structure.
- Manages a range of materials.
- Easy search and management.
- Security.
- Ability to create a hierarchy of materials.
- Difficult to use.
- Difficult to set up.
- Very complex.
- Not very well liked.
- Has not replaced localization of information.
- Range of different materials
- Requirement for hierarchical access
- Requirement for multi-level security
- Teams are spread across multiple geographies and/or time zones
- Contributions from internal and external resources
Good use of MS Sharepoint
- Library search
- Folder organization
- Controlled view access/write access
- Permission request is just a click
- Permission grants done via email notification
- Structure of shared via parent folder or individual is difficult to determine until you dig through settings
- Sometimes grant access does not get executed and would need to be redone
So comprehensive, built-in, big, and customizable, you think it can do anything you dream of
- Permission management: This is super relevant and wonderful for controlling what your audience can see and do, for example, when you need someone to constantly see changes to a "living document" but not have the ability to intervene in the process.
- Contact groups: I find it super good since not necessarily the site administrators are the only ones who can manage the group, you can make any member of the group can manage the rest of the members without this being involved in other site settings. Also when granting permissions, distributing documents, announcements, tasks, it is very easy to do it by group of contacts than one by one.
- Version history: We know that we are exposed to errors and accidents, so having the previous versions of a document, being able to see who has modified and having the possibility of restoring any of those versions can save the day. I always feel that I am protected and that is why I always promote working in the cloud.
- Integration with other MS tools: The workflows that connect outlook, sharepoint, OneDrive, among others, where you can manage multiple actions for all these tools seems wonderful to me, it allows a super necessary and simple expansion to be able to automate tasks that used to be performed manually on a daily basis, it certainly contributes to efficiency.
- Modern view / classic view: I really appreciate the minimalist change that has been made with many of the menus in the latest versions of sharepoint, but most of the time it complicates me and generates many more clicks (much more time) wanting to do one This action can be done by changing to the classic view from the ribbon, for example, managing permissions for a site, being able to manage sharepoint groups.
- A little more advanced configurations, without becoming complex that depend a lot on the IT department.
- Descriptions of some options or settings can become confusing, complicated and you simply are not able to know if it is what you are looking for or not, the language to the user is sometimes understood only through trial and error.
Good Collaboration Tool
- Document management
- Knowledge management
- Website building
Microsoft SharePoint - in a nonprofit.
- Sharing and collaborating documents with the ability to lock documents upon final revision.
- Implementing workflows for specific documents and teams is a plus, this allows certain approval process during a copy edit to run smoothly.
- Project-related sites are quick and easy to deploy templates for fast moving teams or temporary teams.
- Creating a brand new site needs work. More widgets or drop in's perhaps.
- Making the administration a little easier for less technically inclined staff to be able to manage. Sometimes too many features on one screen or too much granular options can be a bad thing. Add an "advanced" menu, but stick with the basics, this saves IT's time.
- Make it easier to design sites that are more appealing to the younger crowd, sites end up just having basic colors and text. The new UI is improved and looks a bit more modern but still is just a bunch of boxes with text in them.
SharePoint Online is good enough
- Granular permission access of files and folders, via AD groups or team site groups.
- OneDrive offline sync mechanism seems robust and handles online/offline well.
- Microsoft Teams integration is useful.
- SharePoint to OneDrive sync mechanism is hidden or difficult to understand for users coming from Dropbox, Box, or other cloud storage apps.
- UI isn't really that great. SPO is a huge improvement, but is still very Microsoft-ish.
- Uploading a new version of a file with a different name is not possible.
Microsoft SharePoint, at the scale of a large org, has no rivals outside of Microsoft Teams
- SharePoint allows information to self-organize well. One version of the truth visible in multiple contexts (views).
- SharePoint allows for a really good relationship between Microsoft Office products and allows for collaboration in those tools to happen a bit more seamlessly.
- SharePoint allows for permissions to govern access to information very well from any level in the site.
- SharePoint in Office 365 allows for information to be accessed in a mobile environment without the need for VPN or server access that has traditionally been somewhat difficult to navigate on a phone.
- SharePoint sometimes has a challenge with the Share feature in Office 365. Traditional best practices are to govern collaboration with permissions groups and manage access at the group level. Share can sometimes undermine that by creating ad-hoc situations unintentionally.
- SharePoint's success in many organizations is really a function of user adoption and training. It is such a large platform that it is often deployed without much governance or direction.
- SharePoint's lists and libraries can leverage Excel services and like-kind tools, but the ability for a list to do math in the same way that Excel does is very limited. It still has a room for improvement in the business intelligence features of metadata management.
Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Log In...
- There isn't much that SharePoint does better than it's competition. Actually, I'm having trouble coming up with a single example. It's our only choice if your business has already committed irrevocably to using MS products.
- Document+page links aren't persistent as files are re-organized, re-named, or have sharing settings adjusted
- Constant performance issues from MS servers, this quarter there have already been two days when the system was essentially offline for most of the business day
Jack of All Trades, Master of None
- I wouldn't say SharePoint does any one thing particularly well, but rather does everything ok.
- It's a very open environment so it can be used in any number of ways depending on a team's needs and structure.
- This makes it a good enterprise-wide tool because you can require teams with varying technical capabilities and business requirements to use SharePoint and it will accommodate them.
- It offers file-sharing, messaging, security controls and integrates well with all of Microsoft's other products like Excel, Word and PowerPoint.
- Navigation is painful and it would be nice to be able to search all documents and text. Better search in general would be great.
- Its so customizable that its hard to really know the best way to do something. Based on how whoever built a page chose to accomplish something, your means of accessing the data can vary so it's a bit of a headache trying to get to information you want. It's never good when technology gets in the way of business.
- The lists can be frustrating to use and are like an underpowered spreadsheet.
Collaborate With SharePoint
- Sharing documents.
- Providing revision history.
- Safe repository.
- Collaboration between users.
- Live collaboration keeping all in-sync.
- Users can get confused if they are editing a local copy or the SharePoint copy.
- If a document gets out of sync, you have to realize it, then find the revision history. Makes sense, but still can be hard for some users.
- SharePoint feels heavy at times.
SharePoint And Teams Play Well Together
- SharePoint is great at serving as a document library for your teams/organizations.
- It has particularly good search features.
- It does a good job of keeping document history, using it's version control features.
- It's fairly easy to learn how to develop SharePoint pages/sites with little to know prior knowledge of the tool.
- It needs to be properly set up and configured. Additionally, it requires constant adjustments for it to give the best results to the end-users viewing the content.
- The mobile application could use much further maturing. Often times, this maps back to my first point.
- Everything in SharePoint depends on site columns and content types. There seems to be no way around this. Either accept it or pick another collaboration tool.
- SharePoint is a great file storage tool for collaborating and sharing documents.
- SharePoint allows business users to create collaborative efforts without having to have vast technical knowledge.
- SharePoint allows for the easy creation of dynamic portals that can pull information from numerous sources and present in numerous formats.
- The native SharePoint permissions model could be made to be simpler.
- Development techniques to extend base SharePoint functionality could be simpler and more examples would be nice too.
- More rendering options and controls are always welcome.
Great for team collaboration and project management
- Team discussion message boards and also internal Wikis our DevOps teams.
- Document sharing is fantastic within SharePoint since it's a central location for all users to access their department files from.
- Office 365 integration is great and is globally accessible.
- Sometimes it's slow to sync with OneDrive or requires you to un-sync and then re-sync.
- UI can be difficult to navigate.
- Version and sharing control should be more straightforward.
Daily "Addicted" User
- MS SharePoint is a great tool to share information across departments with multiple groups and people in my organization.
- MS SharePoint offers cloud accessibility, so you do not need to maintain your docs on your hard disk.
- This is a great tool if you work for a large company as it is secured and also updates in real-time. You could easily find who else is currently editing or looking at the doc!
- It took a little bit to get set up and train everyone on how to use that app.
- Some things are just too complicated.
- Sometimes; really slow workflow!
SharePoint Review
- Storage.
- Sharing and rights access. Using it correctly, an organization can create a proper hierarchy of rights and access for folders. Also, sharing allows the ability to share access to files without the need to attach the actual file to an email. This helps when a document is later updated - you do not have to resend an email, as the document updates will be reflected to all shared users.
- Backup and security.
- Ease of use. Some things are just too complicated.
- Setting up rights and shared folders. The setup process is not clear and very difficult to control. It's very hard to see who has access to what and if there's an error or a user should or not being seeing a folder they may not have permissions for.
- Sharing and version control.
Good product but hard to use
- Integrates with MS Office and other MS tools.
- There is cloud-based storage.
- It has online editing of MS files.
- Sometimes it is not easy to predict where to search for some specific settings.
- It can be laggy and every day there is a sync issue so you have to refresh all the online files.
- Not cheap to buy.
MS SharePoint Review
- Document libraries is one feature we use most. It allow us to easily organize our files into subs and secure and share them as needed.
- Work flows are very useful as well. We have a process for Capital Expense Requests (CER) that go through a series of approvals before finally hitting the CFO for final approval. This is very valuable as it tracks the process and allows us to report on it as well as see progress.
- OneDrive. We use the file sharing feature which allows you to sync files through OneDrive and easily access those files via OneDrive versus going to a browser and navigating to the share.
- As an admin, I find the navigation for managing some area's of the site a bit more complicated that it needs to be.
- Permissions can be done in two ways, by way of SharePoint or integrated with Active Directory. We use this latter and one issue is granular permissions and identifying groups that have access down to the file level. Basically, if there was a way to report on permissions for a hierarchical perspective down to file level for a particular sub it would be helpful.
- We use SharePoint online and my biggest complaint about that, is the amount of service issues that occur on the hosted service. While I appreciated the constant development and improvements that are being made in the environment, impacting the paying end user as a result is hard to swallow.
SharePoint, for when you already pay for Office 365!
- Integrates well with Windows and Mac machines.
- Works independently and with other Microsoft applications well.
- Safe and secure cloud storage for files.
- There is a bit of a learning curve to onboard new users.
- Slow workflow.
- Not a lot of support for apps outside of the Microsoft cosmos.
Disappointing Software that could so easily be better!
- Easy to add new information and documents into specified folders.
- Easy to set up folder permissions and control access.
- Familiar Microsoft Ribbon interface in the backend that allows easy configuration.
- The layout and configuration options seem to have stayed very static in the last few upgrades and leave much to be desired.
- Error handling is weak and detailed information on certain errors is not available.
- SharePoint is very difficult to configure and set up on a clean server. The process is not intuitive and makes little sense to the common man. Many hours were spent trying to get a basic setup installed and working.
- Where it is employed in a large enterprise company with a dedicated IT department and dedicated SharePoint support staff who have been trained in its configuration and support.
- Where a small company requires an intranet solution,
- Where the company who wants to use the software does not have a trained team to install, administer and support the software.