MySQLPricing

Positirve Impact Low Cost comapred to noSql databases

It's cost-effective and has saved us money in licensing Being able to host on-premise means we don't have large cloud fees It runs on standard … request system. MySQL allows us to implement an enterprise-grade database in a cost-effective and easily supportable way - we don'…

obtaining speed in the queries occupies less disk space, in addition to its price and all the tools of great Scope it possesses.

size DB. *) Need cost effective RDBMS solution … Have free community edition make it cost efficient. Most … We let go SQL server as We don't want to use Windows server and bare the cost of Windows licensing.

also be cost-effective. when choosing the DBMS system we opted for MySQL as it is lite weight, efficient, and open source. Thus reducing the cost as well … Being open source has reduce our Application cost efficiently. Its high performance helps produce efficient software.

Nowadays, new database solutions are available that store data in JSON, key-value format. MySql stores data in a tabular format which is one of the best ways … into the product for new features. In case your requirements are for a key-value pair database or graph databases,…

Low Cost - Free Easy to install and maintain Free support and communities, as well … Cost related, is the biggest advantage.

availability. We used it on the Solaris and Windows Environment and it is really cost effective solution and its community edition nearly all the major features … Well suited for the SMB environment and cost effective solu…

of projects It is a easy to use, maintain and build applications. It saves cost and can work of bare minimum infra. Can be scaled as the project grows Data

MySQL makes it possible that we can store data No licensing cost so doesn't break the bank

works well with most of the popular programming languages. It is better and cheaper than other relational database services available in market. … ROI is high, as it is a cheaper and better solution. As it is easy to understand and implement, it saves

Quickly launch application Fairly cheaper compared to some other solutions Beginner friendly; most people on our team … is relatively easier to use and than PostgreSQL or SQL Server; it's also cheap to use in production compared to SQL Server. For a beginner who wants

database management system) for small-medium projects, easy to implement, cost-effective, easy to make changes, easy test, and supports millions of records … organizations can use it for free, it is easy to adapt and implement, and most cost savings compare with other SQL providers in the market. It is most s…

providing reliable and efficient services. It is quite expensive, so small business setups cannot afford it. Sometimes we have to face trouble in licensing

through community solution, we can use it in a multitude of projects without cost license The acquisition by Oracle makes you need to contract support for

software, you can scale up in implementations without worrying about licenses fees.

Saves time with easy data management Cost efficient Easy to deploy and set up

allowed us to get going early on with a relational database at very little cost. MySQL fit very nicely within our early tech stack and didn't require changes … of the functionality of other, very costly, alternatives without the big price tag. It is open-source with improvements coming at a relatively good rate … some challenging points at scale for large appli…

tops concerns is the cost of using the right database engine for the right application to run in a cost-efficient way. … Cost constraints Web based applications deployments Small to mid-enterprise projects … 100% cost savings when applied the

High performance. Free of cost. Reliable and stable. Easy to use GUI with many features.

Positive ROI due to reducing licensing cost for use internally. Since it is well known, support from a third party is cheap and available when needed. … MySQL provides the option to reduce support and maintenance cost when P0 Level 1 support is not really needed for databases…

Very good for basic to enterprise-level needs. Cost-effective … Cost-effective. Easy to use for web applications. … Easy to use. Cost-effective. Integration with development tools

It is positive, MySQL has low cost of licence and implementation.

Performance and easy deployment speeds up the projects Cost of ownership extremely low (compared to similar solutions)