Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Optimizely Content Management System

Optimizely Content Management System

Overview

What is Optimizely Content Management System?

Optimizely Content Management System (CMS) is used to deliver digital experiences across channels and devices with a marketer-friendly interface, AI-generated insights that drive real-time personalization, and flexible content delivery options—including headless delivery.

Read more
Recent Reviews

A Solid CMS Platform

8 out of 10
October 16, 2023
Incentivized
We use the ptimizely Content Management System to manage content on our B2B website. The product enables us to quickly and consistently …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Popular Features

View all 16 features
  • Publishing workflow (125)
    8.1
    81%
  • Page templates (126)
    8.0
    80%
  • Admin section (126)
    7.9
    79%
  • WYSIWYG editor (128)
    7.7
    77%

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons

Video Reviews

5 videos

Software Engineer doesn't mince words | Optimizely Content Management System Review
04:01
Optimizely Content Management System Review - E-Com Manager's Take
05:46
Optimizely Content Management System Review | Ultimate CMS Solution?
05:01
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is Optimizely Content Management System?

Optimizely Content Management System (CMS) is used to deliver digital experiences across channels and devices with a marketer-friendly interface, AI-generated insights that drive real-time personalization, and flexible content delivery options—including headless delivery.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • Setup fee required
For the latest information on pricing, visithttps://www.optimizely.com/plans/

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

27 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Contentful?

Contentful is a cloud based CMS solution that provides the ability to manage content across multiple platforms.The editing interface allows for managing content interactively and provides developers the ability to deliver the content with the programming language and template framework of their…

What is Squarespace?

Squarespace is a CMS platform that allows users to create a DIY blog, eCommerce store, and/or portfolio (visual art or music). Some Squarespace website and shop templates are industry or use case-specific, such as menu builders for restaurant sites.

Return to navigation

Features

Security

This component helps a company minimize the security risks by controlling access to the software and its data, and encouraging best practices among users.

8.5
Avg 8.0

Platform & Infrastructure

Features related to platform-wide settings and structure, such as permissions, languages, integrations, customizations, etc.

8.1
Avg 7.7

Web Content Creation

Features that support the creation of website content.

7.6
Avg 7.6

Web Content Management

Features for managing website content

7.6
Avg 7.3
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Optimizely Content Management System?

The Optimizely Content Management System (CMS) helps users to deliver exceptional digital experiences across channels & devices. It boasts a marketer-friendly interface, AI-generated insights that support real-time personalization, and flexible content delivery options—including true headless delivery. The Optimizely CMS can be integrated with Optimizely Content Marketing Platform, Optimizely Digital Asset Management, and Optimizely Data Platform, to support the entire content lifecycle—from planning and creation to storage and publication.

Optimizely Content Management System Features

Web Content Creation Features

  • Supported: WYSIWYG editor
  • Supported: Code quality / cleanliness
  • Supported: Content versioning
  • Supported: Admin section
  • Supported: Page templates
  • Supported: Library of website themes
  • Supported: Mobile optimization / responsive design
  • Supported: Publishing workflow
  • Supported: Form generator
  • Supported: Content scheduling

Web Content Management Features

  • Supported: Internal content search
  • Supported: Content taxonomy
  • Supported: SEO support
  • Supported: Browser compatibility
  • Supported: Bulk management
  • Supported: Page caching
  • Supported: Availability / breadth of extensions
  • Supported: Built-in e-commerce / shopping cart
  • Supported: E-commerce / shopping cart extension
  • Supported: Community / comment management
  • Supported: Import / export
  • Supported: Website analytics

Platform & Infrastructure Features

  • Supported: API
  • Supported: Internationalization / multi-language

Security Features

  • Supported: Role-based user permissions
  • Supported: Multi-factor authentication
  • Supported: User-level audit trail
  • Supported: Version history
  • Supported: Simple roll-back capabilities

CMS programming language or framework Features

  • Supported: .NET

Optimizely Content Management System Screenshots

Screenshot of Marketer-Friendly Interface: A low/no-code interface lets content editors manage their day-to-day.Screenshot of On-page & in-context editing: Content can be created and edited with a full view into how it appears, wherever it's published.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop layouts: Layouts and drag-and-drop functionality to test creative limits.Screenshot of Content TypesScreenshot of DashboardScreenshot of TemplatesScreenshot of Visitor Groups

Optimizely Content Management System Integrations

Optimizely Content Management System Technical Details

Deployment TypesOn-premise, Software as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsWindows, Linux
Mobile ApplicationNo

Optimizely Content Management System Downloadables

Frequently Asked Questions

Optimizely Content Management System (CMS) is used to deliver digital experiences across channels and devices with a marketer-friendly interface, AI-generated insights that drive real-time personalization, and flexible content delivery options—including headless delivery.

Sitecore Experience Manager, Adobe Experience Manager, and Acquia Digital Experience Platform are common alternatives for Optimizely Content Management System.

Reviewers rate Role-based user permissions highest, with a score of 8.5.

The most common users of Optimizely Content Management System are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(255)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-1 of 1)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
John Shea | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Ektron CMS400 for our organization's public-facing web site. It it used across the entire organization. Sometimes we use it for limited B2B and intranet purposes. As a smaller institution of higher education, financial resources are always a concern. Ektron CMS400 provides a wealth of power, flexibility, and features for an affordable price vs. the competition. Great bang for the buck. It addresses our business need for a central web content management system, including versioning, workflow, and permissions.
  • From a developer perspective, Ektron CMS400 is powerful and flexible. All the features and functionality of the system are accessible to the developer through a well documented API.
  • The system has had great backwards compatibility through numerous upgrade cycles. Security patches have been problem-free.
  • Ektron CMS400 is great for working with structured data. I feel this is a key strength. It is simple to build smart forms for authoring content with structured data. The data is then available in XML format as individual items or collections of items, and may be displayed or applied as desired.
  • The evolution of the product has focused on architecture and functionality that is of value in large distributed installations, but less so for smaller 1 or 2 server implementations.
  • Development of the back end authoring and administrative interface has lagged. It has received a cosmetic face lift over the years, but has received little attention in regards to ease-of-use and usability. To some degree, it has poor discoverability with many idiosyncratic UI conventions.
  • Our authors complain about learning and retaining the knowledge for using the authoring interface. In Ektron's usage model, it is a skilled role. We would prefer the authoring be more intuitive. I don't feel Ektron necessarily lags behind the competition in this area, but there is lots of room for improvement and differentiation here if they chose to make this a priority.
I think Ektron is good for enterprise use where bang for the buck is a priority and there is a commitment to having an on-staff web team: developer, cms administrator, and lead author (at a minimum). For small organization use, I question if it is the best value in terms of staffing required and overkill of functionality; open-source options may be a better fit in this case. Ektron is great when there is lots of structured content that needs to be managed, displayed, and/or repurposed. If you are working with mostly free-form content, and at a smaller organization, I think there are other better options.
Web Content Creation (7)
52.857142857142854%
5.3
WYSIWYG editor
30%
3.0
Code quality / cleanliness
60%
6.0
Admin section
50%
5.0
Page templates
60%
6.0
Mobile optimization / responsive design
30%
3.0
Publishing workflow
80%
8.0
Form generator
60%
6.0
Web Content Management (5)
66%
6.6
Content taxonomy
70%
7.0
SEO support
50%
5.0
Bulk management
70%
7.0
Availability / breadth of extensions
70%
7.0
Community / comment management
70%
7.0
Platform & Infrastructure (2)
90%
9.0
API
90%
9.0
Internationalization / multi-language
90%
9.0
Security (1)
90%
9.0
Role-based user permissions
90%
9.0
CMS programming language or framework
N/A
N/A
  • Ektron CMS400 has helped us to improve web publication speed, especially with forms.
  • The system has helped improve departmental content ownership and content maintenance.
  • Ektron has definitely helped us provide better customer service through fresher content, conversion of paper forms to web forms, and publishing of rich media assets.
Developer
1,000-10,000 pages
Ektron offers great bang for the buck for cost sensitive organizations needing enterprise level cms features and functionality. The compromise occurs in the area of back end interface usability. It is a powerful tool for developers, but requires a significant learning curve for authors. Ektron is also powerful in regards to handling structured content. percussion did not meet our structured content needs. Cascade Server wasn't affordable. As an organization, we have been moving away from open-source and so Drupal and WordPress have not been good fits. (However, we have begun to seriously reconsider WordPress.) SharePoint, at this time, would require more development effort than we are prepared to perform in order to make it work as the cms for our public web site.
  • Implemented in-house
  • Smart forms and handling structured content are a key strength of the system.
  • Ektron's developer API is powerful and comprehensive.
  • Web forms are easy for author to implement.
  • Authoring interface is not always intuitive, has a learning curve, and it remains difficult to insulate non-technical users from needing to know some HTML and CSS.
  • For authors, there is a confusing paradigm in the back end between two different types of content repositories.
  • Although web forms are easy for authors to implement, there are some idiosyncrasies in how submitted form data is handled in the back end. For instance, a submitted email form will never complete if there is an issue with connecting to the mail server. This should be asynchronous, and not the site visitor's problem.
No
Usability principles have been a part of modern web application development for some time now. Ektron lags behind in this area. It's not that the back end is terrible, but to me it does not reflect commitment, expertise, and a systematic approach to usability in Ektron's development process. There are too many UI idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies for my liking.
Return to navigation