Progress Test Studio

User-Friendly Interface: Many users have found the interface of the product to be highly user-friendly. They appreciate its non-intimidating and easy-to-use design, which makes it suitable for both technical and non-technical personnel. The user-friendly interface has made it effortless for users to navigate through the software and perform various tasks efficiently. Efficient Regression Testing: Several reviewers have praised the product for its efficiency in regression testing. It significantly reduces test time, allowing testers to automate functional QUI tests easily. This feature has been a game-changer for many users as they can quickly analyze test results and generate graphical reports for all their tests. The ability to cut down on manual testing work considerably ensures that bugs are kept out of production. Time-Saving Element Repository: A notable feature mentioned by numerous reviewers is the element repository, which saves valuable time when making changes to the interface. Users find it convenient to access this repository as it provides a collection of elements that can be reused across different tests. By having this resource readily available, users can streamline their testing process and avoid redundancy in creating new elements each time. Overall, these three pros - the user-friendly interface, efficient regression testing capabilities, and time-saving element repository - have left a positive impression on multiple reviewers who appreciate the ease of use, improved productivity, and reduced manual effort offered by the product.

Slow coding IDE: Some users have mentioned that they find the coding IDE to be slower compared to Visual Studio, which has negatively impacted their productivity. They have experienced delays in compiling and running code, resulting in longer development times. High cost: Many reviewers feel that the cost of the software is quite high. They believe that it does not provide enough value for the price and may not be affordable for smaller teams or individual developers. Slow loading and start-up time: Users have reported significant wait times when launching the application. The slow loading and start-up time can be frustrating, especially when trying to quickly access projects or make urgent changes. This delay has been a hindrance to their workflow efficiency. Additionally, some users have noticed a slow start-up time for the client itself, causing further frustration as they have to wait before being able to work on their projects effectively.