SAP HANA Cloud

As per my view it is suitable for medium or large scale organization having huge data processing requirements. Speedier data processing will definitely save their time and improve productivity. It will also help organization to enrich user experience.
It is not suitable for small organizations with limited capital because it will be costlier solution for them.

Simplifies our contract management process,
our business partners love it

It is the ideal place to put an ArcGIS geodatabase especially the utility network. This is due to the data federation and data virtualization capabilities. HANA Cloud's ability to execute queries at scale and speed is very, very good. With respect to HANA Cloud vs. HANA Enterprise (on-prem), the additional connectors provided with HANA Cloud at no additional charge make it straightforward to integrate HANA Cloud into hyperscalar's data meshes - like AWS. In a lot of ways, HANA Cloud is a better value than on-prem because it includes all of the options including SDA/SDI and the connectors

Scalable

Great for Analytical Workloads

For companies needing more control on their database

Well suited multi national multi region multi consumer products, make to order, make to stock its the best.
Not suited so well to business that change a lot and often.

In-memory computing, elasticity and agility

I&O replacement

Excellent cloud database to start small and scale OnDemand

While SAP HANA Cloud is designed to integrate with other SAP products, we've found that integrating data from non-SAP sources can be difficult and time-consuming. This has made it challenging for us to get a complete view of our data across all of our systems. Specifically, I would like to see more customization options, a simpler user interface, and better integration with non-SAP systems.

For a large manufacturing organization which has high volume of inter-company movement of material, majority of the data has a source from the ERP. In our case, the ERP also was SAP, hence it was extremely easy to build your own analytics and ad-hoc requirements. For a small and medium business, which might running other cloud based ERP, there might other better solutions available in the market.

In last some scenarios we started using this product to improve our efficiency as well as cost improvement and it helped more than expectations.

One of the details that piqued my interest when I first started working with SAP HASANA is that, no matter how beneficial this program is, it can be extremely difficult for small businesses that do not generate enough revenue to obtain and maintain it. To improve their results, they should, in my opinion, make changes to the HTML parser editor.

Sap Hana is more of a cloud-based database. My experience on this site is storing data. Since using sap Hana, the data is highly secure as due to the inbuilt, highly secure performance. In place of problems solving ability, Sap Hana also is great then compared to other applications.

Enterprise-level applications that require real-time data reporting and processing are best suited for SAP HANA. Additionally, it works best for data lake storage and database compression. The largest datasets accessible today can be processed by SAP HANA using up to 50 servers. Small applications that do not require a real-time database are not appropriate for it.

SAP HANA cloud is the perfect choice for having a common platform to manage all your company enterprise database storing and processing. It also gives lot of flexibility towards hybrid deployments. Less likely inappropriate small company unless you are subjected to grow in upcoming one or two years. Otherwise, the platform is very good for all your enterprise database management.

The SAP HANA is tightly integrated with SAP application like CRM and ERP and the data handshakes between these applications are seamless. This one of the biggest advantage of having SAP HANA cloud . where as there are certain situations where the performance of HANA becomes a bottle neck for reporting as there are various data warehouse systems available in the market like redshift , Snowflake , which are more efficient in data management and build data warehouse systems.

Which is to good to solve and development to bring new things in to the system. Based on the scope what they have relos and responsibilities they performed. SAP HANA is good ERP but compare with others.
Here only one thing is high cost to implement that SAP.except this remaining is all are too good

For logistics and order fulfilment am regularly using and it’s good essential tool that every big enterprise clients should have it who can afford SAP Hana . Apart from logistics I noticed HR data base also vey well managed in this system which i would most recommended for all global IT companies to go for SAP Hana cloud

• Rapid protoyping of apps on BTP with mostly auto-generated support with CAP and HDI
• Very fast in-memory processing engine. Suitable for analytic use-case's

If you want to scale horizontally, HANA Cloud is currently not well suited compared to No-SQL databases in the market

SAP HANA Cloud is a perfect choice for data analytics, especially when creating a data lake containing data from multiple sources. The SAP HANA Cloud hereby enables creating the intelligent enterprise. It does support all the development tools one cloud wish for, including build-in libraries with advanced algorithms used in the AI space. It hereby truly brings together data and analytics in one unified environment.

Customers who are still using old legacy systems are recommended to transition to SAP HANA cloud to have business-ready information from a single solution while enabling security, privacy, and anonymization with proven enterprise reliability. A few more of the advantage it brings is On-demand self-service provisioning, Elastic scalability, Fully Managed by SAP, Consumption-based pricing, and Cloud Freedom.

Mere migration to SAP HANA DB is not an overall rewarding exercise. However for one it can be rewarding exercise if 1) its an old existing system which would not want to migrate to S/4 directly but would like to take a least risky option of migrating in 2 phase which 4-5 years apart 2)Go for SAP HANA if you want improve technical performance but the organization is not yet ready to embrace a full-fledged change in business operations immediately

Best in the market.