A story of Teamcenter in a Energy Manufacturing company
We use Teamcenter to manage entire lificycle of our product, from CAD to BOM
Overview
What is Teamcenter?
Teamcenter is a product lifecycle management system designed to help organizations integrate and standardize product development processes across functional silos.
Recent Reviews
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Reviewer Pros & Cons
Video Reviews
3 videos
Software Architect Sees the Value | Siemens Teamcenter Review
08:13
It Changes the Game | Siemens Teamcenter Review
03:08
The Good and the Bad | Siemens Teamcenter Review
06:10
Pricing
N/A
Unavailable
What is Teamcenter?
Teamcenter is a product lifecycle management system designed to help organizations integrate and standardize product development processes across functional silos.
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
190 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Enovia?
Dassault Systèmes S.A. is a French company and a world leader in the production of 3D design software, 3D digital mock-up and product lifecycle management (PLM) solutions.
What is Roadmunk?
Roadmunk is a roadmap visualization platform that is designed to enable product managers and their teams to communicate the strategic roadmap throughout their organization. The vendor says product leaders can easily input milestones, roadmap data and create unlimited pivots in real time. The vendor…
Product Details
- About
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- Downloadables
- FAQs
What is Teamcenter?
Teamcenter® software is a product lifecycle management (PLM) system that connects people and processes, across functional silos, with a digital thread for innovation. The vendor states the breadth and depth of the Teamcenter portfolio mean that users can solve more of the tough challenges required to develop highly successful products. From the Teamcenter user interface, people across the organization can take part in the product development process. No matter how the user deploys Teamcenter – whether it be on-premises, on-cloud, or SaaS delivered via Teamcenter X – they get the same solution that is designed to help users innovate faster.
Teamcenter Features
- Supported: ECR Workflows-PLM
- Supported: Data Quality-PLM
- Supported: CAD Options-PLM
- Supported: Multi-level BOM-PLM
- Supported: BOM Types-PLM
- Supported: BOM visualization-PLM
Teamcenter Screenshots
Teamcenter Videos
A Quality Management System (QMS) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) solution. Siemens extends the conventional Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle in Quality Management to Engineering and Manufacturing domains.
Teamcenter Quality is a new product family that works with severa...
 Show More How to integrate MBSE with product lifecycle by integrating people, processes, and tools
How to integrate MBSE with product lifecycle by integrating people, processes, and tools
A video overview of the Siemens Capital Asset Lifecycle Management solution asset lifecycle, capital asset, asset management
Siemen's Teamcenter (also sold by SAP), Arena PLM & QMS, and OpenBOM are some of the most preferred product lifecycle management tools by users.
Teamcenter Competitors
Teamcenter Technical Details
| Deployment Types | On-premise |
|---|---|
| Operating Systems | Windows |
| Mobile Application | No |
Teamcenter Downloadables
Frequently Asked Questions
Teamcenter is a product lifecycle management system designed to help organizations integrate and standardize product development processes across functional silos.
Reviewers rate Usability and Product Scalability highest, with a score of 8.5.
The most common users of Teamcenter are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(147)Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(1-4 of 4)Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 18, 2024
A story of Teamcenter in a Energy Manufacturing company
We use Teamcenter to manage entire lificycle of our product, from CAD to BOM
- Lot of integration available
- High level of customization
- Good support
- AWC should be more user configurable
- Preference should be more clear to use and user friendly
- Error message shold be more clean for the user
- Teamcenter with his BOM struvture gives us possibility to control entire product structures
- Thanks to high level of comatibility we can manage 3D from various format
- JT integration allow manufacturing users to visualize directly 3D Model and BOM structures
We are using Teamcenter from long long time, and se have indtroduced a lot of customization to perform some internal procedure, this means that we had an initial implementation of 8 months, but today we still implementing (or semplifyng in case of new OOTB funcion are available) some funcionality
More flexible and better NX integration
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We are utilizing Teamcenter for our Product Lifecycle Management needs. It is also allowing us to restructure our parts management, BOI, BOM, and BOP to stand up SAP. We are also exploring the functionality of digital documents when creating digital specifications for raw materials. It has an ease of use as well as a robust access management characteristics.
- Parts Management
- Access Management
- Document Management
- User Interface
- Object Classification
- Object Hierarchy
- Faster time-to-market
- Holistic Risk Management
- Material-Based Systems Engineering
Our transition to Teamcenter took approximately eight months for full integration. Initially, basic functionalities were operational within three months, but customization for our material science needs extended the timeline. Tangible results emerged after six months, notably streamlined collaboration and improved data accessibility. By the eighth month, efficiency gains were prominent across our product lifecycle management processes.
Oracle PLM offers a comprehensive platform for product lifecycle management. Its strengths lie in integration with other Oracle solutions, providing a unified ecosystem. However, compared to competitors, its learning curve can be steep, impacting initial adoption. Yet, once mastered, its robustness in handling complex workflows and extensive data makes it a compelling choice for enterprises seeking seamless integration within the Oracle suite.
November 20, 2023
My PLM Experience with Teamcenter
We have a large portfolio of agriculture products and managing its engineering data was difficult. That's when Teamcenter was introduced and observed many of our problems. It has solutions like drawing release, manufacturing BOM release, ECN management, testing reporting, and many more. In my case, we use PLM for NPD (new product development) from scratch to proto development. We go through the workflow process and involve CFT members in the concurrent mfg process.
- For each part, JT is there for the non-design people, who can see how the actual part looks and measure some limited dimensions that are needed at the mfg level.
- In our scenario, we use Creo as 3D modeling and Teamcenter as our PLM, through which integration tasks were handled very well.
- My most favorite thing is it's user-friendly and customizable.
- In Assembly, JT is not directly viewable. There is some alternate method available, but it’s hard to use.
- For resolving field issues, it was difficult to get CFT in one platform. At that point, Teamcenter helps with managing ECR-ECN to include all CFT in one platform.
I'm not aware of the timeline, but I think it was 1-1.5 years after we started migrating old data and using PLM for the new part process of generating new codes and applying workflow review, etc. For 2 years, I have had no issues as we integrated with Creo and now it runs simultaneously.
Teamcenter is user-friendly, easily customizable, provides all information on one platform, and is light to use with any system.
September 30, 2015
An Overview of PLM, the Siemens way
The Engineering Manager wanted to use the software to during our transition from 2D to 3D design. It would primarily be used in our department only at first, and by other departments later. It was very mature software, but at the time we wanted to install locally and what I was given was under powered, so I spent too much time arguing with the IT dept over getting more hardware. It solved all of our design problems in that it tracked EVERYTHING. The biggest problem was that it required a change in discipline by all our designers to track everything instead of using AutoCAD alone. Siemens PLM was great in that respect...
- Tracks design data very thoroughly.
- Making 3D models of our designs was a daunting change, but worthwhile.
- The PLM tracking of old data was excellent.
- The tracking of existing designs in template format was excellent.
- Nothing
- I left just as the implementation was getting really expanded, so I don't know firsthand. But, if it was accepted, it wasn't because of the software. The software turned out to be much better than expected.
Inventor wasn't mature enough. Solidworks was too small. Catia and Enovia was too confusing.
Yes
Many times over.
Once in a meeting, a manager responded with a negative comment about both support and social media... so during the meeting I texted to Twitter something like "@#!$ GTAC". When I got to my desk there were two voicemails waiting for me, one from the head of GTAC, and one from our support person at GTAC.