Siteimprove

Siteimprove is better suited for public-facing websites versus interactive applications. It can index interactive applications, but if an application needs user input to move around the applications, this is not well suited for that.
We have a wide variety of skill levels using Siteimprove.

As a university, being able to scan whole sites for accessibility, spelling, and style errors and train new web users on accessibility are incredibly important. If you have a large website or manage many websites, or have many different users contributing content, Siteimprove helps give you the tools to bring order and consistency. If you don't have a large website you probably don't need it. There are lots of smaller, free accessibility scanners and proofreading options, and Google Analytics is your friend. You really don't need heavy artillery like this for a small site where the content is manageable by a single individual or small team.

Siteimprove works well for managing the health and performance of your customer-facing sites in terms of performance, digital experience, and accessibility. It also helps to define policies to proactively avoid experience breaks or issues for customers before they occur. It can improve by providing more options to configure policies for large sites with thousands of pages.

I have been able to give details analytics reports to the board or other leadership team members if they need information about our website performance or page views. I have also been successful at maintaining a high percentage rating for our quality assurance portion with fixing misspelled words or broken links as they occur. That has been super helpful.

Siteimprove outperforms other comprehensive tools I've used. Despite its complexity, the platform's ease of use and high level of customer service is on par with its capabilities. This platform is a fantastic resource because it aids website accessibility and data privacy and provides quality assurance and control. On the other hand, it does have room for improvement. Sometimes, slowness and a few reporting bugs aren't major issues, I think.