Overview
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in…
ReadyAPI - An easy to use tool with lots of built in functionality.
ReadyAPI - the first choice for API automation
API testing made simple
ReadyAPI
Speeding up QA tasks
ReadyAPI : Good Tool
Software QA Manager
To ReadyAPI or Not
Single Effective Solution for Various Aspects of API Development, Validation and Testing!
Features of ReadyAPI Over Other Prodcuts
ReadyAPI - quick, easy and highly functional
ReadyAPI review
ReadyAPI - Must have tool for API testing
Our main objective is to test services across many environments, also we …
My ReadyAPI experience
- It is used by my project
- It helps us with automating our APIs
Great product, if you're willing to put the work in
When new functionality is implemented and is exposed via …
Awards
Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards
Pricing
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI (formerly SoapUI Pro, LoadUI Pro, and ServiceV Pro) is a REST and SOAP API functional testing tool that enables software developers, QA engineers, and manual testers to work together to create, maintain, and execute complex end-to-end API tests in their CI/CD pipelines without needing to…
Entry-level set up fee?
- No setup fee
Offerings
- Free Trial
- Free/Freemium Version
- Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?
16 people also want pricing
Alternatives Pricing
What is Rapise?
Rapise is a software testing platform that allows users to regression test web, desktop and mobile applications. Some key features include: Playback of Tests, Test Script Editing and Data Driven Testing.
What is Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow (discontinued)?
Tricentis' solution for testing ServiceNow workflows, Tricentis Test Automation for ServiceNow, is a scoped application within the user's Now Platform, boasting a familiar interface equipped with a centralized dashboard to view test plans, suites, cases, and results.
Product Demos
Demo Session: API and Webservices Testing and Automation Using SoapUI, ReadyAPI and Groovy
ReadyAPI + Groovy: Data Driven tests with Rejseplanen’s API - Demo
Product Details
- About
- Integrations
- Competitors
- Tech Details
- FAQs
What is ReadyAPI?
ReadyAPI Integrations
ReadyAPI Competitors
ReadyAPI Technical Details
Operating Systems | Unspecified |
---|---|
Mobile Application | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Comparisons
Compare with
Reviews and Ratings
(154)Community Insights
- Business Problems Solved
- Pros
- Cons
SoapUI and its Pro version, ReadyAPI, are widely used tools for integrating, verifying, and testing web services. They are highly scalable and configurable, allowing for custom test script creation and automation of various test activities. Users have found SoapUI useful in validating complex analysis platforms, establishing baselines for customization, and verifying APIs across multiple products with different interfaces like SOAP, REST, AMF, and JDBC.
Yahoo's Technical Account Management team relies on SoapUI to analyze SOAP messages and troubleshoot issues with ad platforms. Developers, integrators, and technical product managers use SoapUI for testing, automation, and support purposes. ReadyAPI is the go-to tool for API testing, making it easy to create and manage tests. It helps in verifying breakages, tracing back problems to ensure correct data returns, validating endpoint functionality, and load testing with specific scenarios using production data.
ReadyAPI supports API testing throughout the digital transformation process from prototyping to deployment. It is also used for API test automation and integration with Jenkins. Moreover, it assists in importing and structuring web services, API mockups, functional testing, security testing, deploying code to the cloud using containers, and integrating with third-party tools like Bamboo. With its comprehensive features for SOAP and REST service testing, ReadyAPI is recommended for a wide range of API testing needs.
Swagger Integration: Many users have praised the ability of SoapUI and ReadyApi to read in endpoints for a restful web service via a Swagger page or definitions file. This feature has been described as extremely helpful, with reviewers appreciating the time-saving aspect of not having to figure things out directly or rely on specs to build their requests. Additionally, the ability to easily update endpoints when they change was seen as a valuable feature.
Groovy Functions: Users have found the addition of groovy functions in SoapUI and ReadyApi to be very useful. They appreciate being able to use a programming language with Java libraries, which provides them with much more flexibility in how they process results and build follow-up requests.
Auto-generation of Test Cases: The auto-generation of test cases in SoapUI Pro has received high praise from users. It gives them a good head start on their testing efforts by building a set of tests that cover at least the happy path scenarios. Users also appreciate the visual guide provided by the test case GUI, which helps them structure their suites and scenarios effectively.
Cons:
- Lacking User Interface and Experience: Some users have found SoapUI's user interface to be confusing, old-fashioned, and not user-friendly. They have expressed the need for enhancements in terms of design and usability.
- Slow Performance: Several users have experienced slow performance with SoapUI, particularly when loading projects, switching between tabs, and during startup. They have also encountered errors related to insufficient memory, resulting in frustration and delays.
- Limited JMS Support and Third-Party Tools Dependency: Users have mentioned that SoapUI relies on an outdated 3rd party program called HermesJMS for JMS interactions. This limitation restricts their ability to run parallel test suites efficiently. Additionally, they have pointed out the limited support for JMS and the need for third-party tools for AMF method discovery.
Attribute Ratings
Reviews
(51-66 of 66)SoapUI despite the name is not a slipery tool that one always has problems grasping. In fact, it's the opposite!!
- Ability to combine multiple test and adhere to the sequence that they need to run in order to complete successfully, regardless of pass or fail, the result is accurate.
- Excellent GUI design to make it as organic for the tester as they are revising or updating their tests. Once you get comfortable with the core functionality of SoapUI, you can explore the many added capabilities it has, like utilizing groovy or JavaScript. You can provide input and output files for the tests to use in sequence or randomly.
- Excellent reporting mechanism and options to print or to save to file. Also you can include verbose debugging content or create a shorter executive summary version. We even went as far as importing it to SQL database for cataloging and archiving for the sake of better tractability.
- Memory consumption, in large concurrent testing has been a challenge for SoapUI, mostly due to the amount of information that is getting written to the database, but there are workarounds to custom install SoapUI which for example runs on a Cloud server, where it can provide SoapUI the elasticity that it may need with large concurrent tests that run for while before completing.
- compatibility with all other databases and Open Cloud environment such as OpenStack out there in Open source, which I think is already in works.
- Integration of LoadUI is good, but to take serious step to compete with other performance and load testing tools
SoapUi is a great product +1 will use again.
- Robust
- Easy to use
- Free version is nice
- If you don't know XML there is a huge learning curve.
- Creating test suites is tricky
SOAPUI tool for webservices testing.
- Used in Rest based webservices
- Used in Soap based webservices
- Used for Functional testing
- Good LoadUI tool, easy to check result response.
- MAC-OS tool needs improvement.
APIs made easy!
- SoapUI allows me to load WSDLs quickly and in many cases I can avoid reading through hundreds of pages of API documentation.
- I can easily build code base stubs.
- SoapUI saves a lot of time because I can save my test scenarios and reload them when necessary.
- I use SoapUI on a Linux platform. It is somewhat challenging getting all of the third-party applications such as Axis, Jax, JBoss, etc to work correctly with SoapUI.
- Documentation generation could use some serious improvement.
- It would be nice if SoapUI incorporated some API architectural functionality.
SoapUI for automated test management
- Automation
- Test Script Management
- Black Box Test Scripting
- Global technical support staff
Best product for the cost
- Ease of use and setup, particularly with SOAP services where you have the WSDL. Import and go. If your WSDL changes you can update the definition or refactor it, which is a life saver.
- Decent GUI - I feel the GUI is well thought out in most areas.
- Scripting and Plugins - Allows setting of a script repository (Pro). In general, you can script in Groovy or JavaScript throughout a project. We use Groovy and haven't run into anything we haven't been able to find a solution to through scripting. For plugins, we've written some custom ones in Java to add menu items. To use them you just have to drop the jar file in a specific directory.
- Community - The community via blogs and forums is great. If you run into issues you can normally find someone else who had a similar problem. The response on the forums from SmartBear is also good. They also recently added an 'API Dojo' which is very informational.
- REST - They have come a long way, but there could still be improvements here. I find the learning curve much higher and not as straight forward using REST vs SOAP.
- Composite Projects - I'd really like to see them implement something around saving/refreshing Test Suites when using the Composite project ability in Pro. This is currently an enhancement in feature backlog (see their forum for more details). Functionality around Projects and Test Cases seems pretty sound.
Okay web service functional testing tool
- Records Rest requests, easy way to record them and make functional testing easy
- Records Soap requests, , easy way to record them and make functional testing easy
- Changing parameters on the requests
- Assertion on responses easy too and user can save responses
- Rest Mocking is very nice feature to start testing early and give early feedback
- Sometimes it is not easy to maintain, work flow testing is not intuitive
- Json assertion not very easy to do
- Caching responses does not help getting accrate performance numbers
- Security testing still something new
SoapUI an ideal solution for customers
- Assertion tests: Given complex examples tests users can ascertain if a particular logic is properly implemented both from a positive test, negative test, exemption test....
- Results Aggregation: Tests can be packaged to provide high-level results, all tests failed, mandatory tests passed, etc...
- Manual Edits of Soap Request & Viewing of Responses: Allow users to modify data on the fly in a simple interface and allows examination of results in real-time
- Packaging of tests is not trivial, we wrote a program to actually convert from a repository data into the SoapUI project file; scalability was on our side since the testing ran into hundreds of cases. The project file was complex in design so it took efforts to learn it sufficiently to update it.
SoapUI is best in the league
- Groovy scripting throughout! SoapUI can be extended to the limits of your imagination with Groovy. Add in the ability to import any .jar makes it very easy to create new functionality.
- WSDL refactoring is a very useful feature, especially in the early stages when the API is still being developed. This allows you to map existing tests to a new method that has been possibly renamed or even one who's parameters may have changed.
- Fully command-line driven allows tests to be scheduled with a task manager, or run through Maven from any continuous integration system.
- Recent release of API Dojo gives a lot of detailed information to the beginner as well as advanced users.
- JMS is the ugly step-child. Although the protocol is supported, the support is very limited. JMS is supported through a third-party add on (Hermes JMS), which is now very outdated (last update was 3 years ago).
- AMF is the other ugly step-child. AMF does not have any method discovery, so you need third-party tools (BlazeMonster) to help you craft your messages.
- REST, although this protocol was the main focus of the latest 5.0 release, still has some edge issues. Browse the SoapUI fora for details.
- Some parts of the documentation are outdated / incomplete.
Automation with SoapUI
- Allows automated test cases. As with all automation the dark side is the development time involved but for products that require frequent testing that investment in time has paid long term dividends.
- Fully programmable using groovy. I did not know Groovy prior to using SoapUI but it's so similar to Java that the transition was seamless.
- I find it quite useful to parse the response from one call and use that as input to the next.
- The learning curve was difficult. I struggled to get it to do anything useful at first.
- I'd like to see more examples to get newbies started.
soapUI is an Indespensible Web Service Tool
- Immediate access to and ability to execute web service requests
- Very elegant and simple to use UI
- Includes very useful features for developing test projects and supporting multiple WSDL versions
- I recall having some issues with SoapUI on Mac. I haven't used it on a Mac so I'm admittedly not sure if these issues have since been resolved. I never had any issues with it on a Windows machine.
A review from moderate experience point of view.
- Incredibly easy to use and set up. Does the majority of work for you.
- Great interface. You can get a lot of information on screen at once.
- Has a high level of customization. Being able to modify settings relevant to your needs is a breeze.
- In my use I honestly have not had any negative issues with SoapUI.
What is in my mind for SoapUI
- SoapUI has HTTP, REST, SOAP, JDBC, WEB Service for functional testing
- Support good assertion scripts such as Java and Groovy
- Full JAVA and Groovy library
- Nice framework support and easy to use
- Enhance documentation supports
easy, trendy, powerful tool
- Functional Testing
- Load testing
- Web services testing
- Functional testing could have been more practical
- Would like to see how it is different from TestComplete for functional testing
- TestComplete does most of the stuff
SoapUI - Developer's and Tester's Best Friend
- SoapUI is really easy to use and has a very small learning curve. It doesn't really matter if you are a programmer or not you can pick up SoapUI quickly. The user interface is really very intuitive.
- Since it supports many protocols such as SOAP, REST, HTTP, JMS etc.. it greatly helps the developer to use a single tool and not jump around tools.
- SoapUI can help create really advanced Load test scenarios really quickly. It can also integrate with LoadUI which has superior Load Testing Experience.
- There are plugins available for IDE's such as Eclipse, NetBeans and IntelliJ. So if people prefer using the SoapUI inside the IDE they can use it as well instead of opening another tool.
- It is capable of creating mock services for all kind of web services which is very important for testing.
- The only disadvantage I could think off right now is that its Plugins for IDE's don't work as well. But that shouldn't keep you from using it. You can always use the SoapUI tool instead of the plugins.
SOAP UI
- We found it an excellent tool to get started with web service testing.
- SOAP-UI's intuitive and interactive user interface makes web service functional and performance testing a cake walk
- Once you are familiar with the tool, it is extremely easy to learn more complex tasks like creating groovy scripts etc to automate the testing.
- SOAP UI should support functionalities like tcpmon out of box.