Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Overview

What is Microsoft SQL Server?

Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Solid and Reliable.

10 out of 10
August 28, 2023
Incentivized
We use MSSQL Server along with SSIS and SSRS as it's a very competent software suite and very stable. It integrates well with other …
Continue reading

Microsoft SQL Server Review

9 out of 10
October 28, 2022
I am a computer engineer. I have been working as a software developer for about 7 years. I've been using Microsoft SQL Server since I was …
Continue reading

SQL Server Review

8 out of 10
June 19, 2021
Incentivized
We use MS SQL Server as our main database to store customer data. We have a monolith web application that is using a single MS SQL Server …
Continue reading

MS SQL Server

8 out of 10
May 25, 2021
Incentivized
For the uninitiated it is first important to point out that many programs use a Database at the back-end and the end-user will be totally …
Continue reading
Read all reviews

Awards

Products that are considered exceptional by their customers based on a variety of criteria win TrustRadius awards. Learn more about the types of TrustRadius awards to make the best purchase decision. More about TrustRadius Awards

Reviewer Pros & Cons

View all pros & cons
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing

Subscription

$1,418.00

Cloud
Per License

Enterprise

$13,748.00

Cloud
Per License

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Return to navigation

Product Demos

An Introduction to Microsoft SQL Server's Statistics

YouTube

Introduction to Transact SQL (T-SQL) using Microsoft SQL Server

YouTube
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Microsoft SQL Server?

Microsoft SQL Server Video

Microsoft SQL Server Technical Details

Deployment TypesSoftware as a Service (SaaS), Cloud, or Web-Based
Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo

Frequently Asked Questions

Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database.

Reviewers rate Usability highest, with a score of 9.9.

The most common users of Microsoft SQL Server are from Enterprises (1,001+ employees).
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(1611)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(26-50 of 96)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is used in our organization to store data, run analyses, and produce reports using data from our web-based application. It is mostly being used in the data analytics department and it allows the team to work on projects together and integrate with other software used in the organization.
  • UI is user-friendly, making integration easy for all members of the team.
  • It is easy to set up and teach to new members.
  • Good support with third-party software.
  • Cost can be expensive.
  • Some learning curves for users transitioning from other services.
If security and consistency is important then Microsoft SQL [Server] might be a great option as your DBMS.
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
SQL Server is used company-wide: All of our business data is stored in SQL databases and all of our applications utilize SQL in some capacity.
  • Scales well
  • Widespread usage means resources are more readily available.
  • Reliable when configured and maintained properly.
  • *Very* complex
  • Performance can be poor when configuration isn't tweaked just right.
  • System resource intensive, and some resources are capped by licensing.
  • Upgrading to newer versions is difficult and time-consuming.
SQL Server is a good choice for situations where a more industry-standard database server is a better fit than an open-source option, or when products or development that is based on other Microsoft tech will be used.
Paul Nockolds | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We use Microsoft SQL Server to store various databases that are used within both the whole company and also within certain departments. Data from these databases have front-end interfaces for easy editing by certain users and data also feeds into other systems and is merged with other data sources. It allows us to have a common silo for storing our data that helps developers and admin staff easily access the data for further use.
  • Good range of data types helps us store lots of diverse data
  • Easy administration helps us control who has access and what they can do with the data
  • Backup and restore processes are easy to manage and provide good security
  • Data can be easily replicated from Server to Server for use in other countries
  • The import/export process can be tricky to follow with lots of steps and could be better for importing flat files
  • Obtaining help from Microsoft is cumbersome and often other internet sources are better and quicker
  • The documentation is not great and again it's generally better to obtain help elsewhere if needed
Ultimately [Microsoft SQL Server] is fairly easy to set up and easy to use if you have knowledge of relational databases and how they work. Being from Microsoft it is a well known, widely used robust piece of software that is ever evolving and plenty of related information can be found all over the internet in various guises such as forums and blogs.
April 08, 2021

Gets the job done.

Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is being used across the company in mostly all IT and technical / data departments. Microsoft SQL Server allows us to pull data from different tables, manipulate it however we need, and use it elsewhere in the company. For example, I use Microsoft SQL Server to pull data from a different application and use it to make updates in Salesforce.
  • Ease of use
  • Intuitive
  • Powerful
  • None
Microsoft SQL Server is well suited to access multiple tables at the same time and extract the data with relative easy. Microsoft SQL Server is extremely powerful and universal, so it should be well suited for most all companies with large data sets. Microsoft SQL Server would probably be less appropriate for smaller companies with small amounts of data.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Our company uses MS SQL Server to run jobs, store data and generates reports. Our team is supporting two separate companies and both use MS SQL Server. One is for storing data and running SSIS jobs for app and reporting purposes. These are company-owned servers and we are hosting other companies to provide service, application and hardware support for them.
Our company maintains these servers and they are being used by different departments, also internal company-wide. Business problems that we commonly encountered are mostly connection issues. These are basically a between network, database and applications connecting to MS SQL Server. The MS SQL Server support is easy to get in touch with when we are having issues with the application itself.
  • Maintenance, SQL server is easy to maintain.
  • User Friendly, Easy to use and understand.
  • Access, user access, and administration are very straightforward.
  • Application, it is easy to setup and provide service.
  • Can be used in small and enterprise sized clients.
  • Support cost, need to pay for support.
  • Compatibility with other new technologies.
  • Reporting capabilities.
  • Licensing, it is a lot of work to get licenses renewal
I think it is best used in small businesses if you will be just paying for the hosting platform. Building your own server, maintenance, support, and application will be very expensive. Getting support solutions from other companies will be the best option since you will not have any problems setting up and will have the database and reports ready for you. In the enterprise setting, creating and building will only have a licensing issue if they can provide and maintain their own servers.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
My department uses SQL Server (and Azure Data Studio, increasingly, but still primarily SQL Server) for database management and analysis. Other departments use it as well, including our QA team, to verify the expected output of data manipulation or the functionality of changes to the code base. It's a pretty standard tool at this point.
  • Query analysis and execution plan details - You can see indexes you may be missing that would (if used) possibly improve performance of your stored procedures and queries.
  • Data storage - It's easy to restore and back up entire databases and to set up automatic jobs to do this.
  • Scheduled tasks - You can plan health checks or updates to data, or reports, from the Jobs tool.
  • Unlike Visual Studio, there isn't a built-in or out-of-the-box way to format your SQL scripts/queries. You can easily install plugins and extensions to do this (paid or free) but it would be a nice-to-have.
  • Occasionally it's not obvious from a query execution plan what piece is causing the most bottleneck, and even then, side-effects of implementing the suggested index(es) aren't always obvious.
If you're a developer and you do any work with retrieving or updating data, Microsoft SQL Server is a great choice (assuming you're working on a Windows machine - although I think it's easier now than it used to be to connect to SQL Server from other operating systems). It's fairly straightforward and the learning curve isn't terribly steep, and if you put the time and effort in you can learn a lot about performance tuning and best practices.
Quentin Goin | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I consult for system and data integration projects. Many of my customers use SQL as their data management and storage system. During integration projects, I will also use SQL to store information that I need later in the integration process or for reporting purposes or auditing.
  • Storing data in a de facto standard relational database.
  • Industry proven connectors to the data.
  • Options for hosted (Azure) to on-premise.
  • Options for scalability from SQL Express to SQL clustering.
  • Developers have their change list, however, it does what I need.
Large to small amounts of data that is logical and fairly predictable type of data. It provides a way to see the data and access it in a logical way. SQL provides the system for database architects to create their own database as efficiently or not so efficiently as they wish. The platform is flexible.
SQL is not as well suited for fuzzy data storage or data lakes.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
SQL Server is our go-to database for both on-prem and cloud database needs. We are running on-prem for 3rd party, custom applications, and the enterprise data warehouse. The Cloud is great for custom applications, as well as beginning to migrate to a data lake structure with Azure SQL DW. Other than embedded databases in a few apps, it is the only RDBMS technology we leverage, although we do run several different versions and editions (Azure SQL DB, Azure SQL DW, SQL Server 2016, 2017).
  • It's easier to manage than other RDBMS.
  • Good, mature, in-the-box interface for both development and administration.
  • It has a fully extending feature set for managing Azure SQL DB to SSMS and/or Azure Data Studio.
  • It's simplifying security/access setup for Azure SQL DB.
I have been using MS SQL Server since version 7, and it has grown significantly in that time. While in the early days I would only grudgingly consider it for departmental level use, by 2005 it had reached enough of a level of stability and reliability that it was a good option for small to mid-size enterprise use. Today, I consider it the premiere RDBMS for virtually any scenario, particularly considering the number of options available. Microsoft's continuing pursuit of separating compute from storage also seems like the right direction, and allows for the compute engine to leverage big data scenarios as well, where the data is sufficiently structured to support utilizing external tables. This provides for use of familiar SQL tools against outsized data sets that do not fit easily in the RDBMS storage paradigm.
Keri Schneider | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I use Microsoft SQL Server to write SQL queries for my healthcare organization to do reporting for national quality metrics. It allows me to write efficient, fast queries that export nicely to Excel.
  • Error logging and indicators
  • Colors keywords
  • Allows for easy formatting
  • Allows for multiple tabs
  • Allows for multiple subqueries
  • Needs more specific error messages
  • Sometimes it seems "buggy" with the predictive text
  • Needs an in application help resource that is easier to understand
Microsoft SQL Server is well suited for Excel exports of data for on the fly reporting. It smoothly incorporates subqueries that allow large pieces of data to be joined together without bogging down resources. It can also easily be used in other applications. For fancy visual effects or pictures it is not well suited. It is a very "bare bones" application.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
In our database department, we use Microsoft SQL Server for storing data, data aggregation, and manipulation. We use Reporting services tools for creating, managing and deploying reports for our clients. For creating a report definition I personally used Report Builder which makes defining data source connections, queries used to retrieve data, expressions, parameters and others extremely easy to perform. We also try to improve the performance of stored procedures, user-defined functions, and triggers by learning the execution plan in detail. One of our clients has a web app for an insurance company and they have a large amount of data stored in the Microsoft SQL Server database. Our goal is to improve performance from queries that are used in that web app, so we try controlling execution plans with hints or adding indexes. In cases when we meet a new client who already has some database storage then we use replication technology for copying and distributing data and objects from one database to another. Besides that, we also help our clients to build parameterized queries in order to defend from SQL injection which is one of the most common web hacking techniques.
  • It offers a lot of functionalities, such as Reporting Services, Integration Services, Job Scheduler, Resource Manager, Query Analyzer and Profiler, etc.
  • You can connect it to Active Directory if you so desire.
  • The price of the enterprise version could be a little lower and also licensing should be more understandable.
  • There can be problems when connecting with software that is not owned by Microsoft.
When a client is working in a .NET environment and he is developing a web application then it is advisable to use Microsoft SQL Server as a storage solution. Also when some company wants to store a large amount of data then Microsoft SQL Server is an extremely good solution because it is a very stable and maintainable database option. But in cases when someone wants to make a small website or application that stores a small amount of data then it is probably better to store it in some open-source database which is also free to use. When some company relies a lot on analytics then SQL Server is the first-class solution. A scenario where it would be less appropriate is when some startup doesn't have much money for starting and at the start they don't need some very professional RDBMS, then they could use something like MySQL.
Armando Peña | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are using Microsoft SQL Server to store the data of many commercial and internal software applications: SAP Business One, our Point of Sale system installed in more than 60 branches around the country, several web and desktop applications, and our data warehouse used across the company. That represents thousands of transactions per day.
  • Easy setup
  • High performance and flexibility
  • Data recovery
  • Linked server functionality
Microsoft SQL Server handles a thousand transactions very well, but a bad database design can turn that into a nightmare. The tools that it brings are great integration services. The analysis services and reporting services are very flexible and productive. It is integrated very well with Microsoft Office. In terms of programming, the support is great.
Michelle Sollicito | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently use SQL Server in Azure which makes management easier, though I have used on-premises SQL Server for many years, many versions. I am Microsoft certified in SQL Server 2012 and 2014. As a software developer I like the way SQL Server is easy to program against -- especially when using Entity framework or Entity Framework Core as the middle ware. As a database administrator I like the fact that SQL Server is truly relational, which makes it much easier to model business objects as data tables and to manage Referential integrity, locking and consistency. I like its ability to help with performance scaling via pre-compiled queries, stored procedures and triggers. I like its ability to help with scaling via sharing and replication. But above all I love SSMS (SQL Server Management System) which brings together all the tools in one place with easy access to query plan tools and analysis tools as well as SSIS / SSRS allowing integration of data with other systems and generation of reports.
It has matured over the years into a tool that makes life easy for those architecting or writing systems.
  • Modeling and Schema creation
  • Query optimization tools
  • Integration with coding tools via Entity Framework etc.
  • Analysis, integration and reporting tools
  • Better handling of blobs so that they do not slow down queries (lazy loading by default perhaps)
  • Automatic Migrations -- migrations are complex right now, tools that make it easier would be useful
  • Cheaper!!! It is too expensive, forcing many people to go to datalakes/s3/NOSQL databases when they do not really want to
Green field sites where you can start by modeling the business objects up front and getting the relationships right, the integrity right. Database First Entity Framework environments.

It's not so good for Code First or even Model First Entity Framework because typical coders do not really understand data modeling to the degree necessary -- and later on they suddenly find a whole load of duplicates they did not expect -- or a relationship that does not make sense, constraining what they wanted to do.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We are a Business Intelligence shop utilizing the entire Microsoft Data Stack. We use SQL Server versions 2012, 2014, 2017. We are also currently evaluating 2019. Our entire organization also uses SQL Server. In our department, it is used to ETL data in (via SSIS), store it into a Kimball Data Warehouse, do reporting off of it via SSRS, and then provide self serve analytics to our business users via SSAS. The best thing is that SSIS, SSRS, and SSAS are all included with SQL Server!
  • Great integration tools via SSIS.
  • Great reporting tools via SSRS.
  • Great analytics tools via SSAS.
  • Latest versions (2019) really push the envelope forward on automatic query optimization.
  • Need to be careful on licensing and features. While they have done a great job in 2019 to make features available in standard edition, a lot of use cases may require the more expensive enterprise edition.
  • SSIS and SSAS doesn't play well with source control.
  • There is no "Data Virtualization" (Not talking about PolyBase) You should be able to spin up a clone of a database with minimal effort and storage space. No reason to have to pay a secondary company for such a vital feature!
It doesn't matter if you are doing OLTP or OLAP. SQL Server is just great. And when you compare the cost of this vs other paid DB products, like oracle, the cost is drastically cheaper! Unfortunately, it still is paid so it is hard to start using off the bat for newer companies. They will typically go to Postgres and then migrate over to SQL Server in the future. Microsoft is working hard to lower this barrier to entry. But it looks like it will take some time.
Duncan Hernandez | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is the base of all of our in-house servers. We use it to access all of our internal and external data that comes from Verint and other places. It solves our need to store the data that we have in one location and to create a data warehouse on top of it.
  • The workbench is very good. I like that you can explore multiple databases in one query window.
  • Exploring data is very manageable compared to other SQL querying tools.
  • Simple language to learn and very easy to transition from other SQL learned in other environments.
  • IntelliSense slows down query writing. It sometimes freezes the query window.
  • The data that you can copy-paste from the results is limited and I'd like to be able to copy-paste whatever I want.
  • It isn't case sensitive, which isn't a problem until you get to reporting.
For data exploration, it is very good. Being able to explore data across different databases and servers without switching windows is very convenient and saves a good amount of time.
Query errors are hard to dissect. I'd love for more details to be included or if the server was smarter in diagnosing errors at more precise locations in the query.
October 29, 2019

A helpful tool

Darrell Robinson | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
IT uses it to design queries within our ERP platform, as requested by various stakeholders throughout operations. There are over 100 separate queries that are used daily. I use it for various accounting reports, as I find it provides more of an exact "what I'm looking for" than the canned reporting available through the ERP.
  • Able to zero down to a specific instance.
  • Having new queries on separate pages eases going back and forth.
  • The capability of changing databases quickly.
  • Older versions had an auto-fill feature for columns that seems to have disappeared. That's why I prefer using the 2008 version.
Microsoft SQL is well suited for the ease of creating reports, due to the copy and paste feature to Excel.
Nicolas Poague | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server primarily serves as the back end of our core business system, which is built on Microsoft Dynamics NAV on the front end. Essentially everything our business does goes through this system, making access to the data crucial. While SQL Server is a required component of NAV, the system still needs to perform and be reliable all of the time. Luckily SQL Server is widely supported and time tested, allowing us to choose it with confidence.
  • Support: Microsoft support and documentation make usage and maintenance worry-free.
  • Performance: developers and admins have the ability to tune performance to meet their application needs.
  • Prevalence: being an industry standard, compatibility and support are widespread.
  • Learning curve: while SQL databases share many of the same concepts, admins and developers need to be familiar with the interface and quirks specific to SQL Server and the Management Studio.
  • Cost: as with most enterprise software, especially from Microsoft, the investment needs to be considered.
  • Required resources: both system resources and other considerations for maintenance and in-house support may be heavy compared to other solutions.
The adoption of SQL Server really comes down to your specific application requirements. You may be left without a choice, in which case you may need to evaluate the bigger picture. If you already run a Microsoft shop, the adoption should be a pretty straightforward one. If not, you may be looking to more costs and requirements than necessary.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is being used by the whole organization. Our core OLTP database system is on the MS SQL Server.
  • I think that Microsoft SQL Server is the best database software for small and medium-sized companies
  • Microsoft SQL Server has a user-friendly interface for the database admins.
  • Microsoft SQL Server is cheaper than other databases (like Oracle, etc.).
  • Microsoft SQL Server is not suitable for big companies.
  • Microsoft SQL Server has to improve with more transactions. If you have too many transactions on the database, there is no response from the database to the user.
  • Microsoft SQL Server has to improve its big data technologies.
It is used for small businesses, but it is not suitable for big companies. Used for technologies on the Microsoft SQL Server. It becomes unavailable after a while, like CLR. It is bad for the database system.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL server is the official database management system for Microsoft, and it is a very reliable tool. Our team has a platform for analyzing city infrastructure which has multiple instances and a DBMS is crucial for managing all of the data. We use Microsoft SQL Server to check queries before publishing them to the live website. The tool is dependable and fairly straightforward to use, even for someone inexperienced with database management.
  • The tool is scalable and able to handle large amounts of data.
  • Microsoft SQL Server is compatible with many platforms and languages.
  • It is reliable and has the backing of a large and well established company.
  • The performance and speed of Microsoft SQL Server could possibly be improved.
  • Better tools for monitoring databases and better interface for these tools would be helpful.
  • Easier ways to create complex queries would make the tool even more user friendly, for instance drag and drop style tools to create queries.
Microsoft SQL Server is a solid Relational Database Management System and is useful for any team or company that needs to manage large amounts of data for their tools or platforms. It is less necessary if the amount of data being stored and queried can be handled by a smaller tool, as Microsoft SQL Server does require a license and is not open source, and purchasing licenses for several people can get costly for a small team.
Akshaya Bhardwaj | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
In my company we use it project/account wise, Our main purpose to use it is because it has a very easy user interface and lots of internet communities for providing the solution.
  • We used to merge the data from different sources. For this, it is very to do in SQL Server.
  • Main times we used it to clean the data by reducing the unwanted rows and removing the delimited values.
  • Creation of stored procedures are pretty much simple in it, and these created procedures are very handy and simple to create because syntax is very easy in it.
  • There are no data visualization options available in it. For that, we need to connect it with different tools.
  • No inbuilt statistical modules/formulas. We need to make our own.
  • If data is more than 100 Columns and rows then it will definitely crash on its own.
For basic data manipulation and data cleaning, it is one of the best tools that is available in the market. We use it to fetch the data segment-wise and again to fill some missing values with some random values. For drawing some statistical inferences, we can not use it, Then we again load the data in SAS EG, R Studio, etc.
Gary Davis | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I use Microsoft SQL Server primarily as the back end database server to ASP.Net C# websites. For authentication and authorization, the database uses tables and stored procedures to implement membership or identity for user login and defining roles. Of course, the database is used to hold data entities for the needs of the website. Use of stored procedures, views, and sequences full-text indexing are just some of the useful features I take advantage of.
  • Speed of selects with appropriate indexes.
  • Use through C# of Linq queries to the data.
  • Ability to use CLR assemblies to program in C#.
  • Replication to keep the database mirrored to another server.
  • I sure wish the T-SQL language was more like C# - it's really primitive.
  • I would like an easy way to pass an array to stored procedures and a way to iterate through the array in the code.
  • Integrated source control for the database would be appreciated.
Microsoft SQL Server is well suited for various scenarios and solutions since it is a general-purpose relational database capable of easily and efficiently meeting the needs of your website or application. It is fast, reliable, scalable and easy to use. Due to its popularity, there are many sources of user help, tutorials, examples, and solutions available.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is being used as the default database management solution. It is used across the whole organization and is responsible for managing different types of databases such as ERP, Spatial and regular ones. SQL server caters to regular reports generation, establish relational queries between different datasets, provide backup in case of any issues.
  • Microsoft SQL Server has a very user-friendly interface. It is a breeze to create and schedule jobs for data reporting and updates.
  • The online community support and the numerous forums for Microsoft SQL Server are really handy in case of any issues.
  • Microsoft SQL Server supports Spatial Databases which is a critical requirement for an organization like ours.
  • It would be great if working with SSIS packages would be much more streamlined in the Microsoft SQL Server. As of now, the only option is to use Visual Studio which in itself is not very forthcoming in how to work with a package.
  • The version upgrade can be a bit of nuisance in case you have different databases created on different versions of Microsoft SQL Server. The version compatibility for different databases can definitely be improved upon.
If you work with Spatial Databases, definitely go for it as it supports a wide library and the online community support is a real boon in case you are stuck anywhere. On the flip side, there are some performance issues with very long queries and the Enterprise costing structure also needs to be considered.
Steven Gockley, MBA, MCSA | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Microsoft SQL Server is our primary data storage for our in house software as well as 3rd party financial software and provides the data for all of our enterprise reporting. We also leverage the additional services that come with Microsoft SQL Server including SQL Server Reporting Services and SQL Server Integration Services.
  • Extremely Reliable - We have not had an instance of SQL Server itself having issues or causing downtime. We have had AWS hardware failures but not Microsoft SQL Server failures.
  • Total Cost of Ownership - Having Enterprise Edition provides us with the additional features of SQL Server Reporting Services, SQL Server Integration Services, and if we would like, SQL Server Analytics Services.
  • Multiple disaster recovery options - You can use mirroring (replaced by Always On Availability Groups), replications and log shipping to name a few options.
  • Elastic Database options - You can have a mix of on-premises and Azure instances if your use case requires it.
  • Easy Manageability - Microsoft has done a great job of making the management of Microsoft SQL Server easier with every release.
  • In-Memory Database options - You can have in-memory tables for any business case needing that level of performance.
  • While I really like their disaster recovery options, they could make them more affordable and easier to implement. Always On-Availability Groups is improving with every edition but still can come with some gotcha's if you do not watch it. Including Security across instances, jobs across instances, etc.
  • In memory, at least in 2014, once you enable it that is it. You cannot go back. This makes it difficult to retire this feature.
  • Better native Enterprise management meaning, in a use case where you may have multiple servers or clusters with multiple instances the native tools are lacking and typically require purchasing 3rd party tools or building out tools for monitoring and managing the servers and databases.
I love the fact that with the Enterprise version you also get a robust reporting platform, ETL tool, and data warehouse platform. While some use cases may favor other tools in this space, these tools are all mature, robust and feature-rich with 3rd party add-ons available. When compared with other options in the Enterprise space such as Oracle and DB2, I like what Microsoft SQL Server offers and now it can be installed and ran on Linux which is a huge plus.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It is used as a data warehousing and business intelligence platform across the whole organization.
  • Troubleshooting is easy because of several forums available on the internet. We can Google error messages and find solutions easily.
  • It has a complete set of tools for data warehousing and business intelligence, so integration and automation are easy.
  • Easy access to training and skilled workforce availability.
  • There are some in-memory tools in the market that I have used to replace analysis services. Those in-memory tools have reduced the aggregation time to a few minutes as compared to a couple of hours on analysis services.
  • Mobile apps for SSMS and SQL agent would be a good addition to the toolbelt.
  • A built-in SQL source code control tool that can be used to track code changes and schema changes from SSMS would be very useful. It should easily show who made the changes, what changes were made and when, and provide an option to roll back to any of the previous versions if needed.
SQL Server is easy to implement and has all the components for data management and business intelligence. It needs some performance improvement and built-in SQL source code change tracking.
Robert S Hough | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We have used SQL Server for years, and it has been our main database for desktop projects. It also has been the database engine to choose when developing financial applications for its speed and security. We also use it when working with complex data and a variety of fields.
  • It is quick and easy to create data and tables using their built-in aid, and it has a wide variety of fields.
  • We like to correctly support stored procedures which facilitates processes and enriches functions within the application and can delegate more responsibility to the database.
  • It integrates seamlessly with other Microsoft applications, such as Visual Studio in addition to many other third-party applications either natively or by means of ODBC connectors.
  • Can manage user permissions easily.
  • The installation may take longer than expected.
  • It requires a lot of resources for its implementation.
Microsoft SQL Server is a professional database that can be used in any scenario. I have not seen limitations in terms of its use. I recommend it even more for window-based applications.
May 14, 2019

Microsoft Database

Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We currently use Microsoft SQL Server, integrated with Automation Anywhere, to develop automation scripts. We opted for SQL Server for its Microsoft support and native Automation Anywhere functions that allow us to work with this Database.
  • SQL Server, because it is Microsoft, has the support of the company, and it is possible to integrate with thousands of applications that run on windows.
  • The price of the paid version of SQL Server is well below the market average, although we do not lose in quality.
  • It allows the developer to use a managed programming language, such as C # or VB.NET, to address queries, rather than using SQL statements.
  • The main point that displeased me most in SQL Server 2008 is the lack of intelligence of the tools.
  • Since Microsoft decided to support the creation of stored procedures and other database objects in .NET framework languages it seems that T-SQL has been a bit sideways.
  • Difficult to mount a cluster, mirroring, replication...
As SQL Server is from Microsoft, it is more feasible for the less experienced developer to start working with Database in SQL Server, but currently, we only use the tool because of its integration with Automation Anywhere. If we could, we would choose another.
Return to navigation