Skip to main content
TrustRadius
11:11 Public Cloud

11:11 Public Cloud
Formerly Sungard Availability Services Managed Hosting

Overview

What is 11:11 Public Cloud?

11:11 Public Cloud provides the flexibility and scalability of traditional Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). The solution includes VMware-based public cloud and managed hyperscale cloud offerings.

Read more
Recent Reviews

Terrible to work with

1 out of 10
April 07, 2020
We provide software and web development services to a healthcare organisation within the UK and they have their current website and …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Pricing

View all pricing
N/A
Unavailable

What is 11:11 Public Cloud?

11:11 Public Cloud provides the flexibility and scalability of traditional Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). The solution includes VMware-based public cloud and managed hyperscale cloud offerings.

Entry-level set up fee?

  • No setup fee

Offerings

  • Free Trial
  • Free/Freemium Version
  • Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Would you like us to let the vendor know that you want pricing?

2 people also want pricing

Alternatives Pricing

What is Amazon Web Services?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a subsidiary of Amazon that provides on-demand cloud computing services. With over 165 services offered, AWS services can provide users with a comprehensive suite of infrastructure and computing building blocks and tools.

What is Rackspace Managed Hosting?

Rackspace Managed Hosting is cloud computing company Rackspace's managed IT services and IaaS offering. Its infrastructure options include bare metal servers, virtual single-shared servers, and cloud multi-tenant environments.

Return to navigation

Product Details

What is 11:11 Public Cloud?

11:11 Public Cloud provides the flexibility and scalability of traditional Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS). The solution includes VMware-based public cloud and managed hyperscale cloud offerings.

11:11 Public Cloud Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(7)

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-3 of 3)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
April 07, 2020

Terrible to work with

Score 1 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
We provide software and web development services to a healthcare organisation within the UK and they have their current website and database hosted within Sungard's infrastructure.

As their web developer, we needed access to the server in order to deploy updates to their website software. This has so far taken us 6 months of back and forth with their support team and we are still no closer to gaining the access we need to our client's server, despite the client having initiated this request themselves.
  • Security - no-one can access your systems, even you!
  • Convoluted support systems.
  • Obstructive bureaucracy.
  • Inflexible support personnel/policies unable to do what it takes to get the job done.
I honestly can't think of any that couldn't be better served by Azure.
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) (1)
80%
8.0
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
80%
8.0
  • Delayed several web projects due to inability to gain access to servers.
  • High cost in lost/wasted time and effort trying to get anywhere with their support team.
No contest. If you can, use Azure.
Support is completely inflexible in their policies and procedures, turning even the simplest request into a months-long ordeal.
Chandrabhan Singh | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Sungard is a decent company with good products. My organization always felt that my department needs the easy data sharing. We sought out to many products. One of them which I personally tried and tested is Sungard's. The interaction between teams using data has become more convenient. It has given structure to various reports.
  • It has a great advantage for inter-team sharing
  • For large data, I found it convenient.
  • I have seen great structure in reports followed
  • If handling with multiple files, I found it tough
  • The support of new features was not up to the mark
  • I found many modules confusing.
When shared with multiple teams, I could not find many products better than this. I enjoyed working in this aspect, it was smooth in cross-teams transferring. They have a good foundation of technology I would say, the thing it is lacking is in the usability for non-technical people. I have seen many struggling with this aspect.
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) (8)
57.5%
5.8
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
60%
6.0
Dynamic scaling
70%
7.0
Elastic load balancing
50%
5.0
Pre-configured templates
60%
6.0
Monitoring tools
70%
7.0
Pre-defined machine images
40%
4.0
Operating system support
50%
5.0
Security controls
60%
6.0
  • Positive - Communication structure between team improved
  • Positive - The sound technology gave as low error rate and more efficiency
  • Negative - The support is weak as compared to many
I would select Sungard on the basis of technology foundation and functionality. It gave me an ample amount of features which I could use in a better way. The inter-team communication gets a better structure than the other products. I would use it on the basis of the above mentioned points. This has proven to be a good support for my team.
Himanshu Singh | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
It has made reporting easier, multiple departments can interact and follow the process easily. The technology is robust and scripting works in optimized manner. The problem we had is there was no process defined for reporting and Sungard gave us a good solution in their product. I would rate this product high on analyzing the cross-departments interaction. But, the specific tool set one would need requires help.
  • When interacting across departments, it gives you symmetric flow.
  • Even reporting process is good across departments.
  • I found it beneficial in accessing the large files.
  • I needed support for many modules, where I think I was not satisfied.
  • The detailing of each module is lacking.
  • If you form clutter of files, there is no solution for it.
In terms of across department interaction with files, it is very well suited. It gives you a defined process and scripts support the product very well. Also, if process is defined I don't have the confusion to provide it the instructions passing on to another department. I wouldn't use it in hustling situation as it breaks.
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) (8)
55%
5.5
Service-level Agreement (SLA) uptime
50%
5.0
Dynamic scaling
70%
7.0
Elastic load balancing
50%
5.0
Pre-configured templates
30%
3.0
Monitoring tools
40%
4.0
Pre-defined machine images
80%
8.0
Operating system support
50%
5.0
Security controls
70%
7.0
  • Positive - Inter-department report flow was quick.
  • Positive - Defined process gave us a defined to finish our goals.
  • Negative - Detailing on each module is less.
I used IBM's product also and I found Sungard a notch better than it. I know the difference between the scalability of each product. I believe when the functionality works smoothly, it all works for the organization. Sungard defined it correctly despite lacking in key detailing of modules. But, when it works, it is better than many of its competitors.
Return to navigation