TIBCO Integration (including BusinessWorks and Flogo)

I have used Oracle SOA and it is extremely complex to develop in it, set up the environment for deploying and managing the environment in production.

TIBCO is quite straightforward to set up and also learn how to develop.

We selected Scribe as it has many features and integration capabilities with many other software.

No other products. Previously users used data loader to mass insert but it took a while to reformat the CSV before using data loader. Scribe is able to map those fields correctly with the hit of a button.

TCI is more ease to use compared to Logic apps. WRT cost Logic apps are more cheap to use

Compared to SSIS, Scribe is ideal for quick, low-cost integrations that require a minimal amount of data manipulation.

We are currently using SnapLogic and it's significantly better for our business usage. It's faster because we can just create an integration workflow and copy it with each of our customers. In Scribe, we'd have to generate a field schema, set up the same solutions, etc which is burdensome.

We have a lot more customization now with SnapLogic to create those support workflows. And, if there is an issue with our proprietary platform, then we can just shut off all the automated integrations in a click of a button. In Scribe, we'd have to go through every single organization (which represents a customer) and manually turn them off.

Scribe is on the cloud and that just makes it easy for a developer or even just the non-it people to view or even create a package. It's easy, the design really focuses on having non-tech people to manage the integration. It works, never had a problem setting up the package. A lot of available connectors which will really help in integrating several systems.

We selected TIBCO Cloud Integration to avoid server costs for the customer.

I have not worked with any other TIBCO Cloud Integration products.

Our consulting partner recommended Scribe as it is big in the MS world and they could help support us.
Price-wise it is very competitive to other integration vendors at least for the couple of connectors we needed.
I find most integration tools generally do the same thing, just each one a little differently. Scribe was pretty easy to pickup and self-teach. Simple visual and drag-and-drop mapping controls made creation pretty fast. Again, not sure how they stack up for complex integrations and data manipulation, but it works well for our simple one-way migration needs.

TIBCO Cloud Integration is one of the most powerful and easy to use ETL solutions on the market. As a consultant, it is always the first tool I recommend to my clients, and I cringe when they consider going with an alternative.

I have not used any other software integration tools.

Have not used any other tools, been happy with Scribe since launch.

We had a home grown propritery software before this, Scribe was the first time we used or needed a tool of this sort.

We have used Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services previously for various projects including data migration and integration, although the product is free and has very high flexibility it doesnt have the usability and connectors of scribe that allow you to quickly create basic integrations and have normal users manage and review these setups

We looked at several other solutions before settling on Scribe Online, including Mulesoft Salesforce Integration and Jitterbit. Scribe had the best features for the price, and appeared to be easier to configure. Our previous solution was not very sophisticated and we had many issues that their support team always struggled to resolve. Scribe offered more documentation and support and that influenced our decision as well.

We have not used many middleware solutions. This was decided by another team other than the development team. Using out of the box software works well when the users understand what they are buying. Someone else chose this solution and our team basically had to conform to the changes whether we liked it or not. A lot of us would have just written batch jobs and background tasks to do this because this is what we normally do.

Informatica: more expensive.
RapidiOnline: more expensive.
Jitterbit: more expensive, did not have NAV connector at time of evaluation.
Mulesoft: way more expensive and complex.
Ended up selecting Scribe because of the good reviews, price, and features.

Prefer Scribe against all others unless I need an enterprise solution, then I will opt for MuleSoft for its robust enterprise service bus model and its new native Salesforce connectivity.

BridgeGate - I was not the decision maker but used the former at a previous job. Scribe has a smoother user interface and a better testing interface. The connector options in Scribe are far superior and much for custom and offer way more options for integrations. I think that what Scribe has to offer will only continue to grow with time and the work of its partners.

We haven't found any other tool that allows us to connect our CRM Dynamics on-premise and Hubspot together.
The only way we know we can do that is by building a homemade custom application, which works great but takes a lot of effort/time to build and maintain.

This was chosen by the Project team for migration and data availability and I am from the support team of the application so it's very visualizing, sophisticated, and easy.

I didn't use any other tool for data migration except Scribe TIBCO.

None.

We evaluated Kingswaysoft integration solutions and Azure Functions but have not used these products as we have chosen Scribe as an intergration solution.