Skip to main content
TrustRadius
Ubiquiti Wireless WAN

Ubiquiti Wireless WAN

Overview

What is Ubiquiti Wireless WAN?

Ubiquiti Networks offers wireless WAN.

Read more
Recent Reviews

TrustRadius Insights

Ubiquiti Wireless WAN has been widely adopted by businesses due to its reliability and ease of management. Users have found it easy to …
Continue reading

Ubiquiti for all!

9 out of 10
July 25, 2022
Incentivized
We use these APs in some of our clients offices, they work great and super simple to configure. They do the job of extending the clients …
Continue reading

Ubiquiti Wireless Review

10 out of 10
October 20, 2020
With fifty locations and a variety of equipment in place we decided to standardize on a single platform for switches, wireless access …
Continue reading
Read all reviews
Return to navigation

Product Details

What is Ubiquiti Wireless WAN?

Ubiquiti Wireless WAN Technical Details

Operating SystemsUnspecified
Mobile ApplicationNo
Return to navigation

Comparisons

View all alternatives
Return to navigation

Reviews and Ratings

(39)

Community Insights

TrustRadius Insights are summaries of user sentiment data from TrustRadius reviews and, when necessary, 3rd-party data sources. Have feedback on this content? Let us know!

Ubiquiti Wireless WAN has been widely adopted by businesses due to its reliability and ease of management. Users have found it easy to deploy, configure, and update, making it a popular choice as the primary WiFi solution in numerous sites. It offers differentiated SSIDs and isolated networks, catering to both administrative and industrial environments.

One of the major advantages of Ubiquiti is its cost-effectiveness; there are no annual licensing fees, making it more affordable compared to other solutions. Many clients have successfully deployed Ubiquiti access points, achieving extensive coverage even with a limited number of devices. For example, one client was able to cover a 65000 sq ft building using just 10 UniFi UAP-AC-HD access points.

Ubiquiti devices have proven their reliability beyond office settings. They have been used to establish reliable links between schools, demonstrating solid performance in various weather conditions. However, some users have reported occasional interference issues when using the AF-5 device, requiring continuous monitoring and adjustment due to the crowded 5GHz band.

Overall, Ubiquiti Wireless WAN offers stability and ease of management, making it suitable for various use cases such as site-to-site connectivity and advanced installations with high-reliability requirements. From offices to manufacturing facilities, Ubiquiti ensures reliable connectivity across different areas. Additionally, it also serves well for personal use, providing seamless transitions between wireless access points and PoE switches for enhanced security.

Quality and Durability: Users and reviewers have consistently praised the quality and durability of Ubiquiti devices, with multiple users noting their solid build and reliability. These devices are known for their long-lasting performance.

Extensive Features: The extensive features offered by Ubiquiti devices have been highlighted by numerous users, providing them with a wide range of options and functionalities to meet their specific needs. Users appreciate the versatility that these devices offer.

Ease of Configuration: Many users have mentioned the ease of configuration and installation of Ubiquiti devices, making them accessible to users of varying technical backgrounds. The simple setup process ensures a hassle-free experience for all users.

Limited Device Support Time: Some users have mentioned that they would like to see increased device support time in the latest Unifi controller versions. They have expressed a desire for longer periods of support to ensure their devices remain up-to-date and compatible with new features and improvements.

Confusing Control Panel for Novices: A few reviewers found the control panel of the product confusing, particularly for those who are new to networking. They suggested that improving the navigation and providing clearer instructions within the control panel would be beneficial for novice users to better understand and utilize its functionalities.

Lack of Phone Support: Several customers expressed frustration with the lack of phone support, as they can only rely on email or chat for assistance. They believe that having access to phone support would result in quicker issue resolution and a more personalized level of support.

Attribute Ratings

Reviews

(1-10 of 10)
Companies can't remove reviews or game the system. Here's why
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
I've used Meraki AP and switches in a large-scale organization and Ubiquiti on a smaller scale. There is a big cost difference, and due to the different sizes and scope of the projects, it's difficult to compare or contrast. Both have worked great for each organization.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
We have transitioned third-party partners and our own internal offices away from consumer, prosumer, or SOHO grade systems such as high-end ASUS, TP-Link, and even Xiaomi routers. For the same money, we can have a more properly architected network that has better performance, better access controls, and better security. We have evaluated other solutions from competitors, particularly Aruba Instant On. While admittedly Instant On is something I'd get for my home given the price, considering it's more geared towards SOHO or SMB than proper enterprise, I wouldn't recommend it for a professional install.
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Prior to this, we used Cisco Meraki wireless access points, which did not allow for centralized control, therefore several access points shared the same SSID. Because the client's movement from one device to another was not as seamless and reliable as it is with the current Ubiquiti solution, this shift cost both time and stability during configuration.
Matthew Dunn | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
Wifi signal and management are superior. I have many SonicWall TZ units with Wifi that are basically useless and added a Ubiquiti unit in place of the Sonicwall Wifi. Netgear nighthawk has a good wifi system but doesn't have the range Ubiquiti does. Netgear is great for the money but still can't compete with Ubiquiti.
GILIAN HASS | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
In the past, we used D-Link wi-fi devices, where centralized management was not possible, distributing the same SSID through several devices. Which cost configuration time and instability in the use between one point and another, because eventually, this transition between a device and another by a client was not transparent and functional as it is today with the Ubiquiti solution.
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
When looking into Cisco options for WWAN, there were two issues we encountered. Up front as well as yearly maintenance costs for each device was considerably more expensive than the Ubiquiti options. And, although the Cisco options have more options to configure, it requires more knowledge to configure and maintain.
Scott Trautwein | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Incentivized
  • amer
amer is literally rebranded Ubiquiti wireless points. They make you pay the annual fee. We cancelled our contract and were able to wipe the firmware and add them back to the Ubiquiti controller. Amer is a big waste of money.
Return to navigation