VMware vSphere has 2 pricing edition(s), from $995 to $3,995. Look at different pricing editions below and read more information about the product here to see which one is right for you.
Standard$995.00Cloud per year | Enterprise$3,995.00Cloud per year |
It is always running into problems when updating. Extra pricing for extra features. More plug-ins are needed.
Reduced Hardware Cost Reduced Software Cost Reduced Maintenance and Support Cost Improved End User Experience … computing resources by providing a top tier user computing experience in the most cost effective manner. Rather than cont…
Low budget and cost effective product for business Its provide the centralization platform to
I feel there are more affordable options out there that can generally do most things well enough if vSphere is out of your price range. … vSphere's suite of products can get expensive but are generally best in segment. They have a strong team and generally … Pricing…
most powerful aspect of this product. It allows administrators to maximize value from hardware purchases and create internal redundancies and high availability
performance. Reduced intra team dependency for test machines. Low budget and cost effective.
well suited to use vSphere. Due to the licensing costs, there can be a high price tag. Smaller organizations without the budget or expertise to manage the
to consolidate and reduce the footprint of your data center equipment and cost. … The positive impact has been the cost of managing server hardware. Having to only update firmware on limited hardware
vSphere can help in takign snapshot of a running server which help in reducing cost of addition backup tool
Pricing. vSphere is the most expensive virtualization platform on the market. It's the best, but you pay for it
Licensing cost is little bit high To manage users should have good knowledge on Virtualization … It reduces other licensing (Microsoft, Oracle, etc) cost while customer uses affinity rules. Once the customer have a good setup,
License are expensive, we are considering AHV now. Datastore management is not friendly. Upgrading
Productivity Single pane of glass Cost is high
Licensing is expensive. Datastore management can have a high administrative cost. Web interface can be a bit slower than their
lots of VMs quickly. It may not be the best for a smaller company due to cost, but the management and features mostly make up the difference. … since we can create machines quickly and manage them. Negative in that the cost has forced us to try to use it for everything to…
widely adopted by virtualization service providers including ours. Also, the price is noticeably lower using ESX hypervisors with vSphere than using other alternatives … Price Product Features Product Usability Product Reputation Analyst Reports
The only thing I could think of as to why you wouldn't want this would be cost, or if you're looking to place your infrastructure in the cloud.
need all the features and can get by with Microsoft Hyper-V or another cheaper alternative.
Expensive to get all the functionality.
Would like a mobile app that allowed you to do minor tasks or monitoring Cost … cut it for us. If you are a small school or bussiness this may be too expensive or overkill.
features you can ever need. It can be scaled to pretty much any size. The cost can be high, so may not be suitable for small companies. … been all positive for us. We use it extensively. Only real negative is the cost, but you get what you pay for.
Very cost effective, big savings in terms of equipment maintenance. Great stability … It can be quite expensive if it comes to extensive usage of the tool, so it can be not a good solution
The cost of vSphere is high considering that the main competitor, Hyper-V, is free
Migration from Hyper-V to VMWare cost the business over 200k. However, up-time of servers went from ~.999 to ~
