Overall Satisfaction with Progress Sitefinity
We use Sitefinity to host our corporate website. It provides a reliable and stable platform to managing the content and deployment of our website.
- Good content management features.
- Good performance.
- Integration with analytics.
- Ability to build upon using API and Visual Studio integration.
- Difficult upgrade process.
- Does not offer an option to restore backend configuration or revert to original defaults.
We mostly chose Sitefinity because we are current users of Telerik (Progress) development tools. When they purchased Sitefinity we decided to switch from our custom developed website to one hosted on a CMS. We have had some experience with DotNetNuke in the past and Sitefinity seemed to be a very polished and usable alternative.
Progress Sitefinity Feature Ratings
Using Progress Sitefinity
5 - Content development, Marking, Software Development.
2 - Software Development and Content Management
- Corporate website
- Marketing tools
- Brand awareness
Evaluating Progress Sitefinity and Competitors
Yes - We replaced a custom solution with the intention of supporting easier content management.
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
- Product Reputation
- Vendor Reputation
- Existing Relationship with the Vendor
We would follow the same process.
Progress Sitefinity Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was minimal
- Creating the initial templates took some time
Progress Sitefinity Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Good followup Knowledgeable team Problems get solved Kept well informed No escalation required Support understands my problem Quick Initial Response | None |
Using Progress Sitefinity
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Convenient Feel confident using | Requires technical support Lots to learn |
- Page organization
- Content management
- Taxonomy and metadata.
- Software updates
- Customization can be daunting