Overall Satisfaction with Mitel Applications Suite
We currently use Mitel strictly for the VoIP application and conference bridge company-wide; the Mitel TeamWork application is currently not being utilized. The organization is split evenly on utilizing handsets with desk phones and the softphone with a PC headset. The system is configured with a structured automated call-flow workflow and manages our inbound and outbound telecommunications traffic.
- Enabling users to load their profile to an unassigned desk phone, which is useful for switching work locations
- Transcribing voicemails and forwarding the transcription to the user's email
- Ability to configure scheduled holidays and company events into the automated answering service workflow
- Softphone upgrades are disruptive and come out too often
- Automated workflow is difficult to configure for re-directing a call to a specific number instead of an extension
- Automated workflow doesn't always take a phone's presence into consideration when attempting to use it in a workflow
- Initial roll-out had multiple instances where the Phone would restart for an upgrade during business hours, cutting off the internal LAN switch
- Once configured, the Auto-attendant has been reliable during normal business hours and under predictable circumstances
- Lower cost than some higher-end providers, which helps in ROI when higher-end functionality is not required
In retrospect, Mitel was not the right solution for us but it has sufficed while we look for a replacement that integrates with our CRM. Skype for Business was being phased out, we were currently using RingCentral, and we anticipated the conversion back to ShoreTel (we had a hosted environment in the past) would be similar to our previous experience with the system. The Cloud-based software and technology, however, did not meet up to the hosted environments capabilities, at least when it came to call-management.