Good job Panda (Adaptive Defense 360)
Overall Satisfaction with Adaptive Defense 360 / WatchGuard EPDR
It's a really good and easy to use product for securing our customers and ourselves. The change that WatchGuard is now behind it is also very good because we use both. Our customers are also very satisfied in our Watchguard Service. But the partners were really badly informed about the progress of the takeover, training, and certification from my experience.
- Security
- Usability
- Technology ahead of everyone else
- The templates or configuration are sometimes confusing knowing where to find something like the password of uninstalling, it should be recategorized.
- The reports aren't correct in the porta in my opinion and when a customer gets a message that something was blocked it doesn't appear in the portal.
- Better contact to partners like it was some years ago
- After every week 1 computer that was infected by malware PAD360 eliminated these cases
- We had no encrypting trojans anymore since we have Adaptive Defense 360
- The performance leaked on other antivirus software and Adaptive Defense 360 did a very good job there
Why do you need to take a software that is in development 2 years behind Panda? We have seen on many security meetings that Kaspersky or Malwarebytes only are good together, why do you need 2 products instead of 1? and with the management console that looks exactly like Panda? No way.
Do you think Watchguard Endpoint Security delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Watchguard Endpoint Security's feature set?
Yes
Did Watchguard Endpoint Security live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Watchguard Endpoint Security go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Watchguard Endpoint Security again?
Yes
As I mentioned before, there are no trojan exploits anymore, no computers that are infected and need to be cleaned, and the installation process is significantly less elaborate, customers are amused how the deployment is in a blink of an eye ready.