Item: BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued)
Rating: 9
Author: Verified User

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use BlueJeans across the whole organization. Because we are active in over 30 countries with no other connectivity between them, BlueJeans solves geographic, connectivity and compatibility issues in communicating internally as well as with external stakeholders.

Pros and Cons

Join meetings regardless of device.
Sharing of content with the choice of sharing screen vs specific applications.

Audio-video not always in sync (especially on lower bandwith networks).
Lower bandwidth requirement (relates to the first comment).

Return on Investment

More interactive sales calls in geographically wide areas.
Reduction in travel expenses.

Alternatives Considered

Skype

We use Skype for Business as well. Bluejeans alongside for increased flexibility in terms of devices. Usability is better. Not all countries use Skype

Likelihood to Recommend

Suited for: Geographically spread sales team calls, multinational project team meetings, and one on one/multiple meetings where content needs to be discussed.

Less suited: larger (20+) meetings where you don't hold tight control as the moderator, and also because of the dependency on the quality of audio equipment on the user side.

BlueJeans: a solid solution

Overall Satisfaction with BlueJeans

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

Pros and Cons

Return on Investment

Alternatives Considered

Likelihood to Recommend

BlueJeans Meetings (discontinued) Feature Ratings