Overall Satisfaction with BQE Core
We use BQE CORE to track time, expenses, and project budgets for all of our projects. The software package allows users access flexibility from either office, mobile or remote workstations.
- Software mobility for all users
- Preloaded templates for simple customization for invoicing or reports
- Dynamic user information on every project
- Invoice statement templates do not have a lot of options
- Remove redundant multiple "clicks" for entrys to "save" inputs
- Additional fonts on all templates
- BQE CORE allowed us to streamline time and expense management without staff manual entry
- BQE CORE provides immediate project information
- BQE CORE was easy to use and deploy to staff
BQE CORE is simpler than Delktek Ajera and has a significantly less upfront investment cost
Do you think BQE CORE delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BQE CORE's feature set?
Yes
Did BQE CORE live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BQE CORE go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BQE CORE again?
Yes
Using BQE Core
9 - Principles, project managers, engineers, clerical staff and accountant
We use CORE support staff for any issues
- Time and expense tracking
- Invoicing
- Reporting
- HR tracking items
- Aged invoice reporting
- Employee performance
- Budgeting
- HR tracking
- payroll
Evaluating BQE Core and Competitors
- Price
- Product Features
- Product Usability
CORE offers the features that were needed for time and expense tracking, invoice preparation and online & mobile app user availability
Nothing, CORE provides us with a useable solution
Using BQE Core
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Relatively simple Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent Quick to learn Feel confident using Familiar | None |
- timecard
- Expense entries
- employee review
- Invoice preparation
- Expenses paid (via accounting module)
- Invoice paid
Yes - CORE provides a mobile app interface for all features. The time card and expense entry interface is user-friendly (even faster than the online desktop version at times.)