Great Device Cloud For Speeding Up Testing
December 28, 2022
Great Device Cloud For Speeding Up Testing
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Team
Overall Satisfaction with BrowserStack
We use BrowserStack for our mobile test automation (native app). We have our automation running on a CI/CD pipeline on every build to prevent regressions so that we can quickly deploy new versions of our mobile app. We do not have a dedicated mobile team so having the automation do a large chunk of the core flows in our QA process saves significant time.
- device selection (large ios and android device choices)
- ease of use (easy setup)
- great documentation for getting started
- Faster turnarounds for beta releases
- better debugging tools for remote usage
- smoother interface when using live views
- device farm options
- dashboard to see test videos/logs
- decreased regressions from 3 days using 4 QAs to 1 day with 4 QAs
- improved test coverage
- Ability to deploy package updates without manual qa
Helped during remote work from home as it allowed teams to test mobile builds in the cloud without having a phone shipped to the QA. It is slower than doing QA on a real device, but it works well enough for the most part.
BrowserStack had the most device types and availability of the devices compared to Kobiton and Amazon Device Farm. Price wise it was significantly cheaper than Saucelabs for the number of parallel threads needed.
Do you think BrowserStack delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with BrowserStack's feature set?
Yes
Did BrowserStack live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of BrowserStack go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy BrowserStack again?
Yes