Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Advanced Malware Protection (AMP) for Endpoints
AMP is being used across our organization on workstations and servers.
- Detects malware and viruses on endpoints.
- AMP shows a timeline associated with an event and if the malicious event has spread.
- AMP quarantines but also does retroactive pullbacks of malicious attachments or downloads if they are later discovered to be bad.
- I would like to see some emphasis put on being able to makes notes if there is an incident you are working on so other analysts do not have to open the incident or ask you if you have worked on the incident.
- More clarity around files/downloads that are quarantined...so that they do not end up in your incidents but maybe another tab for incidents that AMP resolved without need for work by an analyst.
- I would like to see silent upgrades. At this moment in order to upgrade you have to do a reboot, this is my biggest frustration.
- AMP has been able to catch some serious infections and stop them from doing huge damage in our environment.
- The overall cost of AMP vs the cost of not having this protection and getting hit with malware, or other nefarious damage to your environment is well worth the money.
When looking for a Malware Protection for Endpoints, AMP was our first and only choice. We like the fact that Cisco has a whole line of security software that can work together and so our goal has been to use the Cisco Suite that includes Umbrella, Firepower, AMP. We are very happy.
Do you think Cisco Secure Endpoint delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Secure Endpoint's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Secure Endpoint live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Secure Endpoint go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Secure Endpoint again?
Yes