Overall Satisfaction with Cisco ASA
We are using Cisco ASA 5525 for Routing & Natting in our organization & we have connected two sites with site-to-site VPN & our remote users are using Cisco Anyconnect. We have configured Cisco ASA in a way so that our remote users can access the internal resources. We have also configured VLANs for our departments to route the traffic.
- Routing & lots of options in Natting to customize as per the requirement
- Site to Site VPN & Remote VPN for secure communication
- Easy to configure & manage
- Easy to configure the QoS ( Quality of Service )
- ASDN Should be improved
- Need More security for Layer 7
- High Availability
- Hardware cost is low
- Easy to Manage & Best in class technical Support
- Easy to Configure
We were using pfSense before in our environment but we were facing continuous issues in configuration management & policy-based management. After the implementation of Cisco ASA, it has resolved both the previous problems & also provided us a reliable solution with High Availability. It has also provided us best in class technical support.
Do you think Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software's feature set?
Did Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software live up to sales and marketing promises?
Did implementation of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software go as expected?
Would you buy Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software again?
Cisco ASA is well suited for small & medium-scale organizations providing basic security & connectivity. Cisco ASA cost is low as compared to another market available firewall so no such need to improve the network security budget for the same. Also, it is easy to configure so that beginner-level network engineers also can handle it.