Cisco Meraki MR3: Well Versed and Cost Effective Wireless Solutions
Overall Satisfaction with Cisco Meraki MR
We deployed it across the whole organization. Most visible in our guest areas, conference and huddle rooms.
Pros
- It can be easily managed thru the cloud which is very convenient and fewer admin headaches. Its cloud dashboard has good reporting as well.
- More secured guest management, we love the separate firewall for guests and 1-click access.
- It has a built in NAC and can protect us from Layer 3 to 7.
- In terms of downtime or troubleshooting, it can be easily managed thru RDP.
Cons
- M33 has no native AD authentication support.
- M33 has no Multi User MIMO.
- It lessens our local support staff workload in managing wireless from an average of 40 hours to 20 hours because of the remote support feature. Also, it gives them more flexibility to work from home.
- It's cost-efficient compare to other competitors like Aruba in terms of functionalities and simplified management.
- Cisco's technical support is very good and better than other vendors, especially for Meraki.
It's very easy and simple to manage compared to other competitors or products. Cisco Meraki MR33 has good reviews, is well tested, scalable and stable. The most loved features are the management tools,
including monitoring and reporting, as well as, the flexibility since it's a cloud service.
including monitoring and reporting, as well as, the flexibility since it's a cloud service.
Do you think Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points's feature set?
Yes
Did Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Cisco Meraki MR Wireless Access Points again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation