CodeSignal review
January 15, 2022

CodeSignal review

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 9 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with CodeSignal

I mainly use it for applying for jobs in other companies. Also sometimes I do [a general coding assessment] to test myself out. The major problem I encountered is that it is not very easy to add customized test cases. I would like to be able to easily add test cases as I did in HackerRank.
  • UI design is clear and easy to use.
  • Judge system responds fast.
  • Missing searching method inside the CodeSignal.
  • Missing more detailed instructions when user uses multiple screens.
  • Coding test score.
  • Improved the screening efficiency
Both are good at coding tests. The problem qualities are more or less [the] same. But I prefer CodeSignal since it allows general coding [tests] to avoid leaking problems.

Do you think CodeSignal delivers good value for the price?


Are you happy with CodeSignal's feature set?


Did CodeSignal live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of CodeSignal go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy CodeSignal again?


General coding assessment with proctoring is very handy to screen potential candidates. Also, pair programming is very useful during [interviews] with candidates. What I think is not a good place for CodeSignal is probably when some conceptual questions need to be asked. These questions really more rely on face-to-face conversation.