Overall Satisfaction with HP Asset Manager
HP Asset Manger is being used to track licenses on applications. It is mainly used by the software asset management team to assign billings (cost to employee's departments) and track how many licenses we own. When installed, they did not customize any of the fields, thus the title fields (dashboard) are sometimes confusing. Would like to have a search/query writer that was more helpful.
- Export Excel function
- Notifications
- Display set up
- Contract to asset relationship
- Sometimes too much to fill out
- Help with searching your database
- Report writer
- Interface with our computers (network) to determine how many active installs on employees' computers and compare to our license counts.
- No custom fields were allowed
Do not know
OpenText Asset Management X Feature Ratings
Using HP Asset Manager
12 - Software asset management team and the billing group
1 - Access and excel knowledge
- Billing
- Tracking
- Maintenance tracking
- Versions status
- Contract to assets relationships
- None
- Could find a way to tie it to the network to determine active installs
- Reporting interface
- Monitoring of active installs
- Reporting
- Compare licenses to active installs
Evaluating HP Asset Manager and Competitors
Yes - Not sure, I was not present when that event occured.
- Product Features
No idea.
Report writing upgrade and interface to track active installs on employee's computers
HP Asset Manager Implementation
- Implemented in-house
Change management was a major issue with the implementation
- No source code changing (customization)
- Fields names where not change to standard industry terms
- Reporting
HP Asset Manager Support
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Quick Resolution Knowledgeable team Kept well informed No escalation required Support understands my problem Support cares about my success | Poor followup Difficult to get immediate help |
No - Cost savings
Yes - It was a server interface with HPAM not HPAM itself
Using HP Asset Manager
Pros | Cons |
---|---|
Like to use Easy to use Technical support not required Well integrated Consistent | Unnecessarily complex Slow to learn Feel nervous using Lots to learn |
- Export function
- Req creation
- PO creation
- Making sure all the fields have been inputted correctly