Overall Satisfaction
It is used to implement solutions for our clients. It allows them to manage and update their content without needing developers to handle small updates.
- Syncing between development and production environments
- Managing small updates
- Allows for easy reusability of templates
- Slow to load
- Bulky to install
- Naming conventions are not consistent with industry terminology (doctype, for example)
- Can't directly import .net code in all cases, sometimes forced to use Kentico solutions which take more time to implement than just writing code to a code behind.
- Less time spent updating client sites after launch.
- Increases development time of a site, the convenience is mostly on the client end.
- Desktop and mobile sites are required to have same page/directory structure, which is limiting in some cases.
- WordPress,Sitecore Web Content Management
Wordpress is much quicker and lighter, but not as robust and is suitable in different situations. Sitecore and Kentico offer similar functionality, but with a different approach to development. Sitecore has a much higher price point and similar functionality, so in my opinion Kentico is the better solution in most cases.