Certainly A Better Value Than Adobe Acrobat Pro, But A Bit Unrefined and Buggy
June 10, 2021
Certainly A Better Value Than Adobe Acrobat Pro, But A Bit Unrefined and Buggy
Score 6 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Software Version
Power PDF Standard
Overall Satisfaction with Kofax Power PDF (formerly Nuance)
We are using Kofax Power PDF primarily to create exhibits and exhibit packets for e-filing with local Circuit Courts.
Pros
- Creates PDFs from JPG files.
- Aggregates PDF files into one larger PDF file.
- Looks like a Windows app (specifically, looks a lot like the MS Office Word interface).
Cons
- It's a bit buggy. I've had it crash or freeze several times.
- It's needs more options for header and footer creation.
- The right click (context) menu has confusingly similar names/options.
- It has saved us money by being cheaper than Adobe Acrobat Pro.
- It has cost us time and money by being buggy and crashing.
It is not intuitive. If not for some experimentation, we never would have been able to get it to work. After making three sets of combined PDFs, I think we've figured out how to make it work-- most of the time.
I've tried Nitro PDF and Adobe Acrobat Pro, and I think Kofax is still the best value (even though it's buggy, crashes, and a bit unintuitive).
Do you think Tungsten Power PDF delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Tungsten Power PDF's feature set?
Yes
Did Tungsten Power PDF live up to sales and marketing promises?
No
Did implementation of Tungsten Power PDF go as expected?
No
Would you buy Tungsten Power PDF again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation