Microsoft Defender ATP offers a great alternative to traditional, and even cloud-based AV.
January 18, 2020
Microsoft Defender ATP offers a great alternative to traditional, and even cloud-based AV.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Microsoft Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
We use Microsoft Defender ATP to get visibility into systems, as well as provide antivirus protection for our Microsoft 365 resources. We currently have it set up for just our IT department and a select few users as we consider transitioning our entire organization away from our current, more traditional Antivirus to something like ATP.
- Visibility: It's great to be able to see what KBs are missing, etc.
- Lightweight AV protection built on the already included Windows Defender Application
- Deployment: We've had some issues deploying, especially outside of the Windows environment.
- Offboarding: There is currently no way to delete a computer. They disappear over time. We even renamed a computer, and it kept both the old and new name in there. Eventually, the older machines do go away, but there is no manual way to do this at the moment.
- It's less expensive than our previous AV, which was a bit more traditional and included a support suite of apps.
- It's prevented viruses, which in turn increased production.
Panda Adaptive Defense, in combination with Panda Systems Management, was a pretty big and powerful suite of AV software. However, the AV is pretty traditional, all things considered. ATP will always have a slight advantage due to its ability to seamlessly integrate with the Windows OS.
We also used to use Kaseya to get visibility on stuff like patches, etc. To be honest, most of the data we can get from ATP is sufficient, and another product like that, or Panda Systems Management, seems so close to redundant, bar one or two small features.
We also used to use Kaseya to get visibility on stuff like patches, etc. To be honest, most of the data we can get from ATP is sufficient, and another product like that, or Panda Systems Management, seems so close to redundant, bar one or two small features.
Do you think Microsoft Defender for Endpoint delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's feature set?
Yes
Did Microsoft Defender for Endpoint live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of Microsoft Defender for Endpoint go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Microsoft Defender for Endpoint again?
Yes