Item: Miro
Rating: 9
Author: Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Use Cases and Deployment Scope

We use Miro to collaborate each week within lectures and within projects. It’s great for immediate and immersive collaboration on the same interface and the same workspace: especially when you cannot be in the same room. It’s great for online collaboration and for any number of people. Updating in real-time: it allows you to see where people’s cursors are and what work is being produced at all times.

Pros and Cons

Pros

Online collaboration.
Updates in real time.
Large group collaboration.

Cons

Could have better tutorials.

Return on Investment

Improved distance collaboration.

Implementation Rating

Ease of Integration

It’s easy to pick up on the basic tools, it would be better if the tutorials were easier to understand and more immersive.

Collaboration

We can collaborate on thoughts and initial ideas in a project by collaborating from afar on a Miro board.

Key Insights

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Other Software Used

Adobe Acrobat Reader DC, Adobe InDesign, Adobe PhotoShop

Likelihood to Recommend

Miro is great for when you want to work on the same workspace and interface. It’s well suited to accommodate a large number of collaborators (there’s a feature to turn on/off the visibility of everyone’s cursors on screen). Each cursor has a name so it is easy to identify which person has collaborated. One thing it could improve on; is to be able to access the author of each contribution - whether that’s a label above or next to - or whether it’s a piece of information that is readily available after you click to see more.

Comments

Please log in to join the conversation

Great value!