Overall Satisfaction with Miro
It is not used widely but is suggested by the faculty of Architecture and design as a tool that could be used to help support students. How we use it is completely up to the individual. I have personally used it as a tool both to help with my teaching, as well as scheduling and helping with general team collaboration for my own classes.
- Improved Productivity.
- Reduced repeat questions.
- Helped align objectives from the beginning.
I think it works well overall - I think having separate spaces and boards is a little confusing, and perhaps having 3 most recent boards is a little too limiting for those who don't have corporate accounts. I do like the exporting feature, which is something I've used a lot.
It's easy enough to figure out and there are a lot of nice presets. For those of us who like to create things in a custom way, I think it still works well if you know what you are doing. I think more featured examples from other users in the community can help spark creativity and inspiration in how to maximise Miro's potential.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
I wasn't involved with the implementation phase
Would you buy Miro again?
Miro is great for team collaboration, project management, and live discussion and feedback. It is also great in scenarios where I can leave certain pieces of information such as a general pinboard so that students have a singular place they can refer to - this also cuts down on the number of repeat questions from emails I receive. Where I think it lacks is still in some of the annotation tools which work fine but could be far more sophisticated.