Enable student collaboration, engagement and participation
February 06, 2022

Enable student collaboration, engagement and participation

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

Miro is being used at the College of Environmental Design, the University of California Berkeley as a tool for collaboration, presentation, and feedback from the start of the pandemic. It is currently used by undergraduate and graduate students in the Architecture program. It has been most effective for creating a sense of community, with students being able to collaborate and receive feedback on their work. The whiteboard allows for active engagement and participation in a remote format. Various courses (studio and labs) use it for presentations and crits. We have continued to use the platform even after switching to the in-person format. It has a clean and simple user interface and is easy to use. I had an issue with the number of team members that was sorted out very quickly by the Miro support team with the educational version. The support, response, and follow-ups are prompt and helpful.
  • Collaborative experience
  • Intuitive and easy to use
  • Allows for student participation and engagement in the remote format
  • Allow for large teams in the educational version
  • The permissions and team assignments
  • Speed for large boards and content
  • Organization of the boards
  • Tracking changes
  • We got a free educational license
  • Unlimited team members
Nothing in particular. It was easy to set up and use.
The department made the shift to Miro at the start of the pandemic and it has been easy to adopt and navigate for different courses.
Ours is an academic institution so it has helped in student collaboration and building a sense of community among the students who are typically working together in their studios otherwise. It has provided the opportunity for more engagement and participation.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

Every product has pros and cons and Miro was among the best for the remote format and collaboration for a large group of students and teachers with the infinite whiteboard. Google jam board for example gets too chaotic with the sticky notes and the tools are not easy to use. Adobe has a steeper learning curve.
Adobe Creative Cloud Express (formerly Adobe Spark), Google Sheets, Box, Slack
It is a great online collaborative tool. It helps in building a sense of community. It has been critical during the pandemic for design students in the department to collaborate, showcase their work and projects, and get feedback for improvement. We have used it mainly for student presentations during labs and design crits in the remote format. It is easy to leave feedback and comments for further action. It is convenient to use an infinite canvas/whiteboard instead of slides. We have continued to use it even after shifting to an in-person format, for progress presentations and discussion with students on their projects.