Miro review
November 17, 2022

Miro review

Eero Leinonen | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 8 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We use Miro in place of Jira as a more nibble, flexible and simpler solution. It doesn't do everything and for example the lack of relations between tickets and levels (epics vs. storyes vs. subtasks) sometimes cause issues. However overall we have been happy and the team has decided to keep using Miro instead of Jira, which is also available to the org. Setting up flows in Miro that work for your team, especially if it has sub-teams each with their own backlogs takes some work to find a good solution but after that it is smooth sailing.
  • Easy to use
  • Simple
  • Fast setup
  • User management
  • Lack of relationship between tickets
  • No structured tickets with different levels
  • Facilitated great speed to market
  • Has kept the team working on product and not working on Jira
  • Saved some money in software licenses
It was pretty easy if using something that was ready made.
Makes it possible. We work almos exclusively remotely and without tool like this that wouldn't be possible.

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?


Are you happy with Miro's feature set?


Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?


Would you buy Miro again?


Miro is simpler to use, has better UI, is smoother to operate. User management is also a lot easier even though it lacks some features.
If deciding between Miro and Jira for product management and backlog maintenance it is dependant on you needs. Miro can work great but is lacking some features teams might want that are in Jira. What you get is much simpler UI, no need for admin work in the same way, fast setup and ease of use.