Making collaboration within teams much easier
November 22, 2022

Making collaboration within teams much easier

Jamie Norman | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with Miro

We use Miro for collaboration between product management, development, research, and design teams. Here are a few ways we use it:
  • wireframing
  • design workshops
  • note taking
  • presentations
  • planning and strategy
  • Allowing multiple users to collaborate on features and designs
  • Workshops
  • Taking notes
  • I wish the user could control the shortcut keys to align with other similar shortcut keys in frequently used software, particularly design tools. It's frustrating to switch your brain when jumping between tools
  • the selection model is really annoying. For example, when you drag/move an object, it unselects it immediately. So you have to click it again to select.
  • copy/paste can be very slow
  • pasting a lot of screen grabs can really bog down the UI
  • arrow connections between objects are great when you want them. Often you don't but end up connecting objects accidentally because the handles are so sensitive
  • would love to have more control over text within shapes, as you do when just using text tool. It's weird that options are different.
  • Miro allows our project teams to have a shared source of truth and place where they can contribute, ask questions, and share ideas
  • Productivity and communication are greatly improved by having this tool
  • Miro's templates provide a great starting point for a lot of the types of collaboration we do, so we don't have to reinvent the wheel.
I haven't seen much integration with Miro. A little in Sketch, but it didn't work well
It's essential for collaboration across distributed teams, but also allows us to keep record of the work/project

Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?

Not sure

Are you happy with Miro's feature set?

Yes

Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?

I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process

Did implementation of Miro go as expected?

I wasn't involved with the implementation phase

Would you buy Miro again?

Yes

It has very similar features to the others mentioned; a lot of the basic functionality of using objects, text, and sticky notes. It seems to have the same learning curve as a result. However, we have now switched over to Figma for design and it would be nice to have more seamless integration with the white boarding tool.
It's a great collaboration tool, but it can have some challenges in learning.

Using Miro

  • Wireframe for UX feature planning — working through design and sharing with stakeholders
  • UX Research note taking
  • Stakeholder alignment workshops
  • Product requirement templates
I'm not in charge of renewal, but I anticipate we would continue with Miro into another contract

Using Miro

It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
ProsCons
Like to use
Relatively simple
Easy to use
Technical support not required
Consistent
Quick to learn
Convenient
Feel confident using
Familiar
None
  • sticky notes
  • moving groups of objects
  • connecting objects is too sensitive