Program Management view of Miro.
November 22, 2022
Program Management view of Miro.
Score 10 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User
Overall Satisfaction with Miro
In my organization, we use Miro as a collaboration tool that facilitates training and co-creation sessions but also, many teams use it to visualize workflows, processes, and different maps. During our agile transformation, it also serves as an essential tool before or in the intro phase of moving completely to Azure DevOps. For this reason, we also manage and facilitate backlogs, priorities, sprint progresses, and PI sessions also with this tool, so linking Azure DevOps with Miro is really essential to us to improve workflows and optimize processes.
Pros
- providing templates and useful articles about how to use templates.
- the site is really intuitive and easy to use.
- the visualization is really appealing, pleasant to use.
Cons
- updating data is manual, would be good to be able to link data together like in .xls.
- also link visual graphs to data/data points - either text and/or value.
- to be able to sync the Miro updates with the Azure DevOps tool.
- to be able to copy paste easier information from and to other tools, in big corporate presentations still happen via .ppt plus officially we document projects, programs in .doc, .pdf so it is always really problematic to migrate Miro content to these formats. Also because the Miro board is usually really huge, so if I paste parts to a .ppt or .doc it becomes unreadable.
- Improved collaboration between different teams and businesses within the company.
- Made trainings, workshops more interactive and fun.
- Helped a lot in workflow creation and mapping jaunts, blueprints.
Collaborating on new projects was successful but management reporting out is still a challenge as the organization is still used to receiving .ppt presentations. Also, from an audit point of view projects must be documented as .xls, .pdf, .doc, or .ppt.
Do you think Miro delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Miro's feature set?
Yes
Did Miro live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Miro go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Miro again?
Yes
Miro is more visual, intuitive and appealing to use, easier to understand when sharing. However, it lacks some features but in terms of collaboration and co-creation, visualization can provide more than the other tools.
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation