Overall Satisfaction with NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact)
Currently, NICE is used for calls, sending emails, and text messages. We also use the redial function if more than one contact with the customer is required. I'm not aware of whether the entire organization makes use of NICE; I'm just sure it's been adopted nationally in various sectors thought the organization.
- Fast calls
- More stability
- Easy to transfer calls
- Facility for conferences between technicians and customers
- Ability to liaise between employees for communication.
- A notification with a different ringtone.
- Option to choose country code automatically in phone numbers.
- Productivity grew.
- No difficulties with technical access.
- Problems solved more easily.
With the settings, it was easier to adapt the tool to our functions, as we use it for calls, but there are other sectors that need to use sending emails or text messages, so the company can easily configure this for the functions of each sector. With these possibilities, it became easier for everyone to use the same tool and avoid problems.
Yes -
Previously, we used FrontEnd Verisys for phone calls. The change was due to the ease and progress of NICE.
After the exchange, work became much easier for both employees and management. NICE does not have the same problems as the previous tool, such as user problems when it is necessary to recover.
Do you think NICE CXone delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with NICE CXone's feature set?
Yes
Did NICE CXone live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of NICE CXone go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy NICE CXone again?
Yes