Best call application
Overall Satisfaction with NICE CXone (formerly NICE inContact)
Our department uses it, we use it as a contact entry tool for an IT Service Desk.
Pros
- User-friendliness.
- Good dashboards.
- Good sound in calls.
Cons
- Comparison of calls per agent on the dashboard.
- Fewer failures at the close of the session.
- Easier quality environment.
- Less log-in problems.
- Better call quality.
- Best reports on power BI.
Excellent dashboards so you can correctly review the daily progress of the team, correctly update in real-time from which queues calls, chats, and emails have come in, and be able to update the available queues in each case adjusting it to the level of the agent. Agents can also see through dashboards that we have created ourselves.
Yes - Genesys - Workspace, had many connection failures, always needed corporate network to connect, had multiple failures working from home so it was difficult to maintain a correct adherence with the agents because they could always report crashes that were not reflected in W.F.M. With NICE [CXone] this goes perfectly and there are usually no crashes.
Do you think NICE CXone Mpower delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with NICE CXone Mpower's feature set?
Yes
Did NICE CXone Mpower live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of NICE CXone Mpower go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy NICE CXone Mpower again?
Yes
Comments
Please log in to join the conversation