Overall Satisfaction with pfSense
We are using [pfSense] for routing & security feature implementation on our infrastructure. It provides a custom kernel & based on FreeBSD open source solution that is easy to customize & integrate. We are using it across all the departments & implementation VLANs for allowing the specific data. It also provides a Geo-blocking feature & time-based rule feature that we are using as of now.
- VPN Server
- Load Balancing Feature
- It also provides Reverse proxy
- It support IPv6
- Wake-on-lan feature is also available with [pfSense]
- Less Documentation available
- Difficult to upgrade the firmware
- Software Bugs
- Easy to Configure & Manage
- Cost effective with bundle of features
- High availability
We were using Sophos XG Firewall in our environment but when it comes to cost it's more expensive with limited features. After using [pfSense] we are getting more security features at less cost. After pfSense provides a bundle of security features such as anti-spamming, Sandboxing [and] Content filtering.
Do you think pfSense delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with pfSense's feature set?
Yes
Did pfSense live up to sales and marketing promises?
Yes
Did implementation of pfSense go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy pfSense again?
Yes