Overall Satisfaction with Python IDLE
Python IDLE is used by some people as the IDE for python interpreter in a Windows environment. We don't use it department wide, as it has only basic functionalities in my opinion. Python IDLE is used mainly for writing simple scripts, which are used mainly for text processing and data cleanup purposes.
- GUI interface
- Has scope matching
- Debugging facilities can be integrated
- Too simplistic
- Could not find source revision management integration support
- Only basic debugging is available
- Does not have data-science-specific notebooks (but can be installed separately)
- Already comes along with the Python Interpreter in Windows, so no need to install any additional plug-ins. This is positive.
- Relatively intuitive with a flat learning curve. This is positive.
- Not too suitable for large program maintenance. This is negative.
Python IDLE is very easy to use compared to PyCharm. So for simple python scripting, Python IDLE is preferable to PyCharm, which has relatively steep learning curve. Compared to Python IDLE, PyCharm is more resource intensive, which may be worth it when comes to large projects, but PyChram does not provide any extra value for simple scripting.
Do you think Python IDLE delivers good value for the price?
Yes
Are you happy with Python IDLE's feature set?
No
Did Python IDLE live up to sales and marketing promises?
I wasn't involved with the selection/purchase process
Did implementation of Python IDLE go as expected?
Yes
Would you buy Python IDLE again?
Yes