1. Home
  2. Insurance Agency Management Systems
  3. QQCatalyst Reviews
  4. User Review of QQCatalyst
Still needs work, but is a good choice
June 27, 2022

Still needs work, but is a good choice

Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
Score 7 out of 10
Vetted Review
Verified User

Overall Satisfaction with QQCatalyst

We use QQCatalyst to maintain client information, policies, forms and save documents.
  • Excellent user interface
  • Easy-to-read information
  • Provides good overview of the agency's active book
  • Actually listen to users and really take suggestions in how to improve
  • Use policy information from other existing policies or lines of insurance
  • Allow the system to be customized by the user, to suit the user's needs
  • Client Maintenance
  • Ease of Use
  • Cloudbased
  • It has helped maintain easy access to our clients information
HawkSoft is good for personal lines, but it can be very tedious to enter all information for each policy. QQCatalyst is better suited for Commercial lines than HawkSoft. As of the date of this review.

Do you think QQCatalyst delivers good value for the price?

Yes

Are you happy with QQCatalyst's feature set?

No

Did QQCatalyst live up to sales and marketing promises?

Yes

Did implementation of QQCatalyst go as expected?

Yes

Would you buy QQCatalyst again?

Yes

I used NowCerts and also HawkSoft. QQCatalyst is just easier to navigate, process changes, send certificates of insurance and just get policy information. HawkSoft is a good system but their niche is personal lines. I can create Premium Finance Companies and MGA's with QQCatalyst and NowCerts, not with HawkSoft. QQCatalyst and NowCerts are 100% cloud based. If you have a lot of personal lines clients, then QQCatalyst is not a good option. QQCatalyst needs to update the Acord 25 form in their system so we can actually use all the spaces provided by the Acord company; right now we cant enter information for insurance company "F" anywhere using QQCatalyst.